Articles & Interviews
Transcribed by Dr. Eric T. Karlstrom, Emeritus Professor of Geography, CSUS, May 30, 2016 from Guns and Butter radio program (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q41nZpGTm74 and http://tarpley.net/docs/drills_of_911.pdf)
Introductory clip: Webster Tarpley: “The stand-down order that you do have is we have a Col. Marr, the Commander of the Northeast Air Defense Sector. There’s a request to him: “Launch all your planes.” And he says “No, I won’t do that because if I launch all my planes now, then they will all run out of gas at the same point. And I can’t do that. So I’m keeping them all on the runway.” This is the key to why for one hour and forty-five minutes plus, there’s no effective air defense in this highly critical and usually highly militarized area. And then when he does launch a couple of planes from Langley Air Force Base towards the end, he sends them out over the Atlantic Ocean.”
In my opinion, all Americans owe a great debt of gratitude to researcher and author Webster Tarpley. He has tenaciously uncovered the kind of details that allow us to identify the perpetrators (perpetraitors) and goals of Operation 9/11. In the following interview, Tarpley outlines the details of an incredibly complex and monstrous plan by the “rogue network” of American business/military/intelligence to stage a coup d’etat against the American people and constitution. In his opinion, the primary goal of the coup was to prop up the failing dollar and Anglo-American Empire. While I agree with Tarpley’s analysis on most points, my own research indicates that larger spiritual forces are also at play and that Operation 9/11 was a covert black and wet operation designed to initiate World War III, that is, the “Clash of Civilizations” between Christian and Islamic nations in the Middle East… All for the benefit of “Greater Israel” and the advancement of the Jewish Universal Empire, which aspires to create one-world-government and one-world-religion under their control.
Among the revelations of Tarpley’s research are that Operation 9/11 was very much a product of the American business, military, and government establishment. The list of participating agencies in this top-secret operation is truly mind-boggling. They include, among other agencies:
1) the White House and Vice President Cheney
2) NORAD (North American Aerospace Defense Command)
3) the CIA and DIA (Defense Intelligence Agency),
4) the Pentagon; Army, Navy, Air Force
5) New York City Fire and Police Departments
6) the mayor of New York City
7) FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency)
8) the FBI
9) the Coast Guard
10) Pennsylvania local first responders and emergency managers
11) the FAA (Federal Aviation Administration)
12) U.S. Department of Transportation
13) Canadian government
All this calls to mind the definition of fascism as “top-down, elite revolution” put forth in “The Nazi Hydra in America: Suppressed History of a Century; Wall Street and the Rise of the Fourth Reich” (Yeaden and Hawkens, 2007).
In addition to the now well-documented fact that over 46 military drills, exercises, war games, etc. were conducted by the American military/intelligence prior to and on the day of 9/11, Tarpley documents that:
1) Operation 9/11, a “false-flag, state-sponsored, synthetic terror event,” is an example of “geo-political” or “spheres-of-influence” terror.
2) the sponsors and architects of the 9/11 putsch are most likely to be found within Wall Street-City of London international financial centers and the CIA.
3) the U.S. Air Force played the dominant role in the execution of Operation 9/11.
4) the main beneficiaries of Operation 9/11 are the U.S.-British Empire, which has ruled the world since about 1890, and the U.S. dollar.
6) it is fairly commonplace that military drills can be “flipped” live, as happened on 9/11, the London 7/7 bombings, to become genuine terrorist events, etc.
7) every aspect of the 9/11 operation was preceded, anticipated, and/or accompanied (i.e., covered) by the 46+ drills and exercises conducted by military/intelligence and agencies. Hence, scrutiny of the drills allows researchers a better understanding of what happened in the actual operation.
8) For example, to help understand what hit the Pentagon, Tarpley notes: “Amalgam Virgo 01 is “U.S.-Canada multi-agency drill conducted by NORAD, SEADS (Southeast Air Defense Sector), Coast Guard, Army, Navy” and the scenario is an “unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) drone launched from rogue freighter in Gulf of Mexico or cruise missile from a barge in the Atlantic Ocean.” This drill description helps reinforce the conclusion that what hit the Pentagon was probably a missile or unmanned aerial vehicle that could have been launched from a body of water, from under water, or from a mobile truck.
9) the purpose of many of the drills was to remove fighter pilots and jets from the Northeast area (Washington, Boston, New York, Pennsylvania) at the time the operation was staged. The 9/11 planners’ wanted to ensure that pilots not privy to the coup plans would not take matters into their own hands and actually defend American air space.
10) another purpose of the drills was to confuse air traffic controllers at NEADS (the Northeast Air Defense Sector) at Griffiths Air Force Base in Rome, New York, which was the command center for air defense in the area involved in Operation 9/11. Because of the drills, NEADS personnel were totally confused and could not distinguish the drills from real life flights.
11) To enhance confusion at NEADS, NORAD, located in Cheyenne Mountain, Colorado, inserted false radar blips on the screens of NEADS personnel. Hence, Tarpley argues, some of the “putcshists” were operating from Cheyenne Mountain.
12) real stand-down orders did not come from Cheney, but rather were issued by Col. Marrs of NEADS. This explains why no fighter planes were scrambled to defend the northeastern U.S. for one hour and forty-five minutes during the “faked” attack.
13) contrary to official and unoffical accounts, Cheney may not have been in control of either “continuity of government” or the staged coup attempt on the morning of 9/11. Rather, Tarpley suggests that the operation was probably carried out a private military contractor possessing some hundred consoles. (ETK note: The location of the operation operators could have been at NORAD underground bunker in Cheyenne Mountain, Colorado.)
14) the “Angel is next” communique made to Air Force One as President Bush was flying out of Florida was a warning to Bush by the coup plotters. It suggests that Bush himself was considered expendable by the planners of 9/11. (ETK note: This aspect of the story may have been invented to protect Bush from scrutiny.)
15) the entire FBI, and CIA anti-terrorist task force were sent to Monterrey California on 9/11. (ETK note: Again, this aspect of the story may or may not be true. Either way, it provides cover for these individuals.)
16) the “alleged hijackers” including Mohammed Atta, were recruited and managed by FBI case officers to be role players and the “patsies” of the operation.
17) the complex of drills include many that began a decade prior to 9/11. This is evidence for long-term planning of the operation.
18) the immediate geo-political goal of Operation 9/11 was to justify and prepare for U.S. military attacks on Afghanistan and Pakistan.
19) on the morning of 9/11, the U.S. (STRATCOM) staged nuclear war drills in order to intimidate Russia and prevent Russia from defending the sovereignty of Afghanistan and Pakistan. In this nuclear brinkmanship exercise, the American military, once again, took the calculated risk the destroying the lives of hundreds of millions of innocent people.
20) Several forts surrounding the Washington D.C. area (Belvoir, McNair and others) were “locked down” about a week before 9/11 in order to prevent journalists and others from discovering the Operation.
21) Kean and Hamilton, chief authors of the 9/11 Commission Report of 2004 admitted in their 2006 book, “Without Precedent,” that Air Force officers had lied during their sworn testimony to the Commission. But rather than referring the matter to the Justice Department for indictments, they referred the matter to the Inspector General of the Air Force and the Air Force officers were never indicted or punished for perjury.
22) the 9/11 truth movement has been “cognitively infiltrated” as per recommendations made in a paper by White House staffer, Cass Sunstein.
23) Sept. 11, 2001 was the first and only time in American history when continuity of government (COG) protocols were utilized.
24) Thus, 9/11 itself may have functioned as a drill for testing and fine-tuning COG protocols which could be used to usher in a greater terrorist/coup event in the future.
25) The facts that Cheney and Rumsfeld were among the original architects of the COG protocols and just “happened” to be in high executive positions (Vice President and Secretary of Defense, respectively) in Washington, DC on 9/11 is one piece of evidence that supports the hypothesis that Operation 9/11 was intended to function, among other things, as a test of COG procedures.
26) The 46+ drills and exercises that occurred on and prior to 9/11 provide almost irrefutable evidence that Operation 9/11 was primarily an inside job.
27) While other governments, including those of Britain, Israel, and Saudi Arabia in particular, seem to have played important roles in the Operation, such as for instance, helping to formulate the plan and implement the cover-up, the Operation itself was clearly carried out by American military/intelligence for the benefit of the “rogue network”/invisible government.
Introduction by moderator, Bonnie Faulker:
Webster Tarpley is an economic historian, author, and lecturer. He is author of “Against Oligarchy; Surviving the Cataclysm; A Study of the World’s Financial Crisis” and co-author of “George Bush: the Unauthorized Biography,” His latest books are “Obama: A Post-Modern Coup,” “The Making of a Manchurian Candidate,” and “Obama: The Unauthorized Biography.”
Today, we discuss military exercises and drills that can be then flipped live. We take a look at drills in the years leading up to the events September 11 and those taking place on the day of. These 46 exercises and drills identified by Webster Tarpley are outlined in a revised Chapter 9 of the Fifth Edition of “9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in the U.S.A.,” Tarpley’s seminal work on 9/11. This book is concerned not only with what did happen on 9/11 but also with larger tragedies which came close to happening, but which ultimately did not occur.
Webster Tarpley, welcome. You have a new chapter 9 for the 5th edition of “9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in the U.S.A:” “The 46 Exercises and Drills of 9/11.” Which I have just finished reading. Great chapter! How has this chapter been updated for the 5th edition?
Tarpley: Well, compared to the 4th edition, which came out 3 or 4 years ago, the big difference is that I’ve found about 20 to 25 more drills, depending on how you want to count it. The history of my “9/11 Synthetic” book is the history of delving deeper and deeper into the drills. I think in the first edition in 2005, I was aware of 5 or 6 drills. There was above all Amalgam Virgo 01 and then Amalgam Virgo 02 that had come out in the hearings, although they suppressed it, it disappeared in the final report of the Kean-Hamilton Commission. Then in the 2nd and 3rd editions, I was up to 10 to 15 drills. The U.S. edition, the 4th edition had about 25. And then I’ve added now the remainder.
Let me point everybody in a direction. If you want a convenient way to research these drills for yourself, go to this complete 9/11 timeline; it’s a data base that has been assembled been by various people. It’s part of a website called historycommons. And what you’ll find there is a lot of detail and links and key words and you can follow the links back to the original publications where news of these drills appeared.
The problem, of course, is that they whole website; they seem to be determine to ignore what their own data prove. Which is that 9/11 was, of course, an inside job. It was, very specifically, a state-sponsored, false-flag, synthetic terror action. It was a war provocation designed to produce the war of civilizations and the “clash of civilizations” in the form of the Afghanistan War, the Iraq War, and other wars that we’ve come close to or are now in, with Libya. And this was carried out by this rogue network or invisible government which has been infesting the U.S. federal government in the current form since about the middle of 1890s; since the time of Grover Cleveland.
So rather than waste time with trying to blame this on Pakistan or Saudi Arabia or Israel or anybody else, the attention has to be focused on the U.S. federal bureaucracy- and above all, the interface between Wall Street and the intelligence community. If you can think of somebody like Allen Dulles, the Wall Street bond lawyer and reputed Nazi sympathizer, or worse, who was one of the people to help create the CIA. If you think of his brother, John Foster Dulles. That sort of gives you the neck of the woods that we’re talking about. Where those Wall Street lawyer types meet the intelligence community. And that of course is the CIA pre-eminantly. That’s where you have to look for the problem.
These other countries that get involved are at most very peripheral subcontractors who deliver things that the U.S. invisible government wants. I make a partial exception for the British, since they play a somewhat larger role than others. But that’s basically the idea. So if you want to look at this stuff, go to the complete 9/11 timeline, but don’t take seriously the overview that they seem to be trying to give you with 9/11.
(ETK note: I agree with Tarpley’s conclusions regarding the main purposes of 9/11 and that the Wall Street-City of London-CIA/military-intelligence nexus was involved in the planning, execution and cover-up of Operation 9/11. However, for a different interpretation that posits massive foreign involvement in 9/11, see “Israel and Saudi Arabia: Best Friends Forever”
Bonnie Faulkner: You have said that 9/11 was a desperate attempt to save U.S. domination and that 9/11 changed the agenda of every international gathering. What do you think was the goal of 9/11?
Tarpley: Well, it’s a “geo-political terrorism” or “spheres-of-influence terrorism.” It’s similar to what you had with the Baader-Meinhof group in Germany in the 70’s and 80s and the Red Brigades in Italy more or less in the same period. This is when I started studying NATO terrorism, NATO as an organizer of terrorism.
The problem that you have is that the U.S.-British Empire has been on very shaky ground for quite a while. You had the collapse of the Soviet Union. That seemed to give the U.S. and the British a new phase of royal domination. But by the end of the first decade after the collapse of the Soviets and the Warsaw Pact you could see that the Anglo-American Empire was tending to fall apart. You had countries like North Korea switching from the dollar to the Euro. You had Saddam Hussein of Iraq switching from the dollar to the Euro when it came to payments and oil transactions. And then you had – one thing that I detailed in the book- is a letter from Saudi Arabia saying to the U.S., “Look, we’re fed up with you, we have come to the parting of the ways. We’re going to go ahead and make our own independent foreign policy.”
You also had the fact that Pakistan had emerged as the first country with nuclear weapons that was also a Moslem majority country. So there was the Islamic bomb. And the United States regarded this as intolerable. There was also the open question of what would happen to those five former Soviet republics in Central Asia which Zbigniew Brzezinsky and others regard as very important for world strategy, as which as indeed they are. So all of this was happening.
And the idea was a desperate ploy by this rogue network-invisible government- and it goes between Wall Street and the City of London. It’s definitely an Anglo-American or international entity. They wanted to somehow create a shock that would somehow stop the tendencies toward disintegration of the Empire and allow them to reform it and regroup it. Above all, (the goal was) to save the dollar. If you want one reason for 9/11, it was to save the dollar. To prevent more countries from dumping the dollar. Because after 9/11, if you dumped the dollar, you were a terrorist. And an army would be sent to conquer you. And this is what happened to Saddam Hussein. Exactly this, and others. And we had a couple of brushes with war with Iran that would have been conducted under the same auspices.
Bonnie Faulkner: Let’s talk about the 46 drills and exercises that you have identified. How do you account for the absence of air defense for one hour and forty-five minutes on the morning of 9/11? Could you talk about the war games?
Tarpley: Let me first talk about drills in general before we get into this just so people can get the idea. Military establishments are constantly carrying out drills, war games, exercises, operations, which can be real fighting, and other activities. And they do this all the time. This is the essence of their training. The problem is, with these drills, the danger that every one of these drills poses, is that the drill is supposed to have a scenario which is realistic. It’s supposed to represent something that might actually happen in real life and the military would be forced to defend against it.
The problem is that the drills can be taken “live,” they can be “flipped” live. Drills inherently have a dangerous potential that by making what seem to be relatively small changes in they drills, they can be re-directed and they can turn into real killing. In other words, they go from pretend killing, in the case of hi-jack drills or other drills, they turn into real terrorism with real deaths and real political consequences. I think the most important thing for people to understand is the principle of this.
The general idea is: If you look at a terrorist act and you discover a drill which is close to it in time or space, or both, and you see that the drill scenario corresponds very closely to the terrorist action that has occurred, you have to assume that the terrorist event was created through the drill. And you cannot simply go on entertaining, as many writers try to do, this idea of weird happenstance, or crazy coincidence, or anything of this sort. Especially when it is not just one drill, but, in the case of 9/11, it’s dozens and dozens and dozens. Especially on the day of, but also other drills that prepare it.
Let me just give you some quick examples of this.
1) The attempt to kill President Reagan in 1981 by Hinkley and who knows how many others. In this case, there was a Presidential Succession drill going on: (Operation) “Nine Lives.” So in the middle of a Presidential Succession drill, or right before it or right after it, there was actually an attempt to create a Presidential succession. So what you’d have to do if you wanted to investigate that is look into that drill and see how that drill was taken live. Because that’s pretty much what happened.
(ETK note: Note that an assassination or even an incapacitation of President Reagan would directly benefit Vice President George H.W. Bush, who indeed, had been CIA Director in 1976, and whom many believe was involved in the JFK assassination plot as well. Also, recall that the Rockefeller-Harriman-Bush-Dulles (Wall Street-intelligence) faction has been responsible for orchestrating many, many major events. See my articles on Allen Dulles and the Bush Crime Family on this website.)
2) Another classic drill of military purposes is “Able Archer” back in 1983. The U.S. did a nuclear war drill against the Soviets which looked so realistic that the Soviets decided that it might be at the point of going live. The drill might have transformed itself into a real attack. So the Soviets then went to their own red alert and for a couple of days the entire world was on the brink of nuclear war.
3) This also applies to our own time. The bombing of Libya was the subject of an accord, an international treaty between London and Paris; Britain and France. Signed November, 2, 2010, six months before the big bombing got going in Libya or thereabouts. And this was that the British and the French would hold a bomb-in drill. The drill was that Britain and France bomb a North African country sometime in the spring-summer of 2011. They called this “Operation South Mistral.” Well, guess what? On the 19th of March, Operation South Mistral was taken live and you go seamlessly from the drill into the actual bombing.
4) Couple of other examples. The London July 7, 2005 underground “subway” bombings. It is widely admitted, one of the people involved went on TV and admitted that his company had been holding simulated bomb drills in those stations at that time. Wasn’t that a weird happenstance? Well, I’m afraid not. It’s something much more sinister.
Faulker: Well, let’s talk about the absence of air defense. How do you account for the absence of air defense for one hour and forty-five minutes. Could you talk about the war games? And also the lock-down of military bases.
Tarpley: Maybe the lock-down of military bases comes first. We have these interesting movies like “Dr. Strangelove,” when General Jack Ripper wants to launch his bombers against the Soviet Union. So he locks down his base. Which means you can’t get on and you can’t off and in theory you can’t even listen to the radio. And you have these funny scenes. Another is “Seven Days in May” where econcom has this base out in the desert and you can’t get in and you can’t get out and it’s dangerous to try either one.
So what did they do? You look at these forts here around Washington, Fort McNair, Fort Belvoir and some others. All of these went on this lock-down in the week or so before 9/11, which means the ability of the journalists to come in and snoop and to find out what was going on was severely curtailed. I didn’t even list those in the table. If I wanted to make each one of those a drill we would have been well over 50. Maybe that would have been more dramatic. This doesn’t maybe qualify as a drill. But still there it is.
In terms of the aircraft, let’s distinguish now. I’m arguing “MIHOP,” “Made It Happen on Purpose.” And that is that this faction inside the United States government. It’s an evil Wall Street faction, privately controlled. It’s illegal. It’s a putsch. It’s a coup. It’s an insurrection. These people are traitors. They are not loyal. They made it happen. Now there’s a much weaker version, completely different really, which is “Let It Happen On Purpose” (LIHOP). And Let It Happen on Purpose essentially says that there really is a terrorist organization out there and they really want to attack and they will if you let them. And the accusation, of course, against Bush and Cheney is that they let it happen. Or somebody let it happen.
I would just point out in passing that 1) the official version of the 9/11 commission, the unanswered questions, that was accepting the Kean-Hamilton report with unanswered questions, 2) the “blowback version” which says “yes, it happened that way but you deserve it. It was good because finally the Third World is finding back (this is something that a lot of left-wing liberals have a deep emotional need to believe) and 3) the LIHOP (Let It Happen on Purpose)- all of these are ultimately the same. Their world picture is all the same. Again, the official version, the blowback version, and the LIHOP, are all the same. They all say there really is a terrorist organization out there that wants to attack you and will attack you and if you drop your guard, they’ll attack. So therefore you need to fight them in some better way, maybe not with Bush-Cheney, but maybe with Kerry or with Obama. That’s more or less what it comes down to.
I’m arguing something different.
Now the drills that you mention, the air drills, have three components. Some people have said these are LIHOP drills, in other words, that when you remove the air defense, then the terrorists strike. Well, no, it’s not that way at all. It’s that the air drills are to prevent loyal elements in the Air Force, in particular, from simply taking matters into their own hands and shooting down the planes before they can reach their targets. There’s always this danger. So they had to prevent this from ever happening. But the same complex of drills of air defense also caused the multiplication of hi-jack targets. In other words…
Let me mention what the drills are. It’s a very large complex. It’s a series of drills over about a decade with increasing frequency in the two to three years before 9/11. But on the day of, we’ve got almost 25 drills. The big one is Vigilant Guardian, which is live fly hi-jacking and air defense, hi-jack multiplication, diversion, and confusion, or the results. You’ve also got Vigilant Warrior, of which very little is known. But you’ve also got other operations that tend to take airplanes away from the Boston to Washington air defense zone. That would be Operation Southern Watch that takes fighters to Saudi Arabia to impose the “no fly” zone over southern Iraq. You’ve got Operation Northern Watch that takes airplanes from Langley, Virginia, to Incirlik, Turkey to impose the “no fly” zone over northern Iraq. You’ve got Operations Northern Vigilance and Northern Guardian, these basically take airplanes from the same area and take them to Alaska to northern Canada and indeed, to Iceland. You’ve even got an Andrews Air Force Base local drill that takes three of their very few planes to North Carolina. So there’s a real complex.
You’ve got another one which I’ve just discovered, which is also a big, important one, and that is “Red Flag.” Red Flag, Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada. This takes 100 pilots and planes to Nevada. Isn’t that convenient? Just at the time when they would have been needed in the Washington to Boston area. So the F-15’s of the 71st Fighter Squadron in Langley Air Force Base as well as the D.C. National Guard from Andrews Air Force Base are also depleted by this drill.
So the idea is that you have very few planes left between Boston and upstate New York and Washington, D.C., because the idea is that some air force officer who is not part of the coup, who is actually loyal and not part of the putsch, might say: “It’s clear what we have to do. We’ve got to put combat air patrol over Washington, D.C., and then we’ve got to defend other cities starting with New York and then so on down the line.” So they want to make that less likely.
The other thing that it does, and you can see this in Chapter 9 that I’ve written, we have these tapes and other reports coming out of the Northeast Air Defense Sector (NEADS), Griffiths Air Force Base, Rome, New York. This is the command center for the entire air defense of the area that involves us on 9/11. And these people are in total confusion because they think they are in the middle of a drill. The Vigilant Guardian and quite possibly some others are going on and hijackings are being faked. And the entire scenario is being acted out. So you get, again and again, in these tapes that were released by NEADS in the summer of 2006 in Vanity Fair magazine, you can still listen to these on the internet. They keep asking, “Is this a drill or is this live?” “Is this real world or is this a drill?” And, of course, this creates tremendous confusion.
The other thing that it does is that fake blips are inserted on their screens so they can’t tell what they are looking at. And at a certain point they’ve got to call NORAD in Cheyenne Mountain in Colorado and say “stop putting these fake blips on our screens.”
So you have to imagine that there were putschists, coup-oriented officers in that complex under the mountain in Colorado. The other thing is that there are real airplanes, military and commercial, that are going around saying “I am hi-jacked” and turning off their transponders, so you see the idea. And then of course we are in the middle of these hijacks and the things that you hear from Atta don’t prove anything. Because Atta thinks he’s reading a script in the middle of a drill. So what this does is that it creates total confusion.
Now, the “stand-down.” Everyone said the stand-down came from Cheney. Well…
Faulkner: I wanted to ask you about the stand-down. I wanted to ask you about “the Dick Cheney control” belief.
Tarpley: I think it’s absolutely absurd. Absolutely absurd. To control all this stuff you have got to have a large command center with a hundred consoles at least where you are bringing together all of this data and information. You’ve got to have to have a point with probably not military officers, but private sector operatives. I would think that this was a private military firm. This cannot be done by some character like Cheney sitting in the White House with a couple of phones, with his pace maker ticking away, waiting for his fifth heart attack or his six attack or whatever it is. And that he’s directing this entire thing is absolutely ridiculous.
If you want to see a stand-down order you can find it. It comes out of Northeast Air Defense Sector. I think this entire Cheney story is a diversion from where people should have been looking. It sounded very radical some years ago. But now you notice, Bush and Cheney are long gone. The neo-cons are long gone. And false-flag terrorism continues to occur. So it cannot have been them as the prime movers. They are implicated to various degrees according to their capabilities to participate in these things. It’s true that Cheney acted as a spokesman for the Rogue Network, that’s pretty much how he understands himself. But he’s not the boss of it. He’s simply the public relations man if you can believe it.
The stand-down order that you do have is we have a Col. Marr, the Commander of the Northeast Air Defense Sector. There’s a request to him: “Launch all your planes.” And he says “No, I won’t do that because if I launch all my planes now, then they will all run out of gas at the same point. And I can’t do that. So I’m keeping them all on the runway.” This is the key to why for one hour and forty-five minutes plus, there’s no effective air defense in this highly critical and usually highly militarized area. And then when he does launch a couple of planes from Langley Air Force Base towards the end, he sends them out over the Atlantic Ocean.
He neglects to tell them, well, the obvious. Look, if you are a loyal officer, what do you do? The northeast United States is under attack. I don’t care how many planes you have. You can have two. You can have one. The first thing you do is you put your assets over Washington, D.C. because you’ve got to defend the White House, the Congress, the CIA, the NSA, the Pentagon, the National Command Authority in general. So you’ve got to have combat air patrol over Washington, D.C. You don’t go chasing blips. You put your assets where the enemy comes to you and you can shoot them down from there. And then once you’ve done that you can think about New York and these other cities.
But it’s interesting that the officers in command of this Northeast Air Defense Sector have received relatively little scrutiny. Because that is where you actually see a stand-down order which can be shown. I gave the quote in my book: “I didn’t want to launch the planes at the same time because then they would all run out of gas at the same time.” It’s absolutely absurd from any point of view.
Then, of course, we have General Eberhardt, who is the overall commander of the North American Air Defense Command and General Larry Arnold, also of the North American Air Defense Command. Now relative to this is that Kean and Hamilton themselves made mince-meat of their own report a couple of years after they issued it. The Kean-Hamilton report came out in 2004. And in the book by these two worthy “cover-uppers,” or whatever we can call them, in 2006, they wrote a book called “Without Precedent.” And in the course of their book, “Without Precedent,” they admitted what had been widely observed, that the top officers of the U.S. Air Force committed massive perjury before the Kean-Hamilton Commission, especially in regards to the time lines. Who knew what? When did they know it? What did they do? That had been completely mangled by the top generals of the U.S. Air Force.
And at that point, the question was: Is this at all serious? Does the Kean-Hamilton Commission take itself seriously enough to say, well, we’re going to give criminal referrals for perjury, because these people were under oath, and give that to the Justice Department. And they never did. They gave it to the Inspector General of the Air Force and he, as usual, returned a verdict that there was nothing to it. His name ironically enough was Goering. I wonder if he is any relation to another air force guy called Goering back some decades (in Nazi Germany).
Faulkner: What about a General Meyers? What part did he play?
Tarpley: Well, again, highly suspicious. These are people that you would have wanted to grill. Again, there is no doubt that the coup d’etat was centered in the Air Force. So those are all very critical questions.
But now I think we ought to move on. This question of the air defense is critical but then there’s another dimension. The basic thing that I’m arguing is that every aspect, every meme of the myth, is covered by drills. And in particular, well,
1) Crashing airplanes into buildings: That would be the National Reconnaissance Office drill, Chantilly, Virginia. On the morning of 9/11…. the NRO, which is satellite imaging, right? They can observe the entire world through these satellites. The things that you see with Google Earth was originally a program of this particular agency. …. “Simulated plane crash into high-rise government buildings” and observing all that through satellite imaging. You can certainly argue that radar was not the only way that these events could have been followed. Another way to do it is to simply follow it through satellites from above, not radar which is based on the ground. So this NRO drill is going on at the same time. Again, the same principle applies. If they are drilling crashing planes into high-rise buildings, in this case theoretically their own high-rise buildings but it’s easy to make those changes, then this is where you would have to go in (and investigate). And I give the name of the guy who was running the drill and these people should have been drilled (questioned).
But again, not only was it an NRO drill, but we also have a New York City drill. This is called “Red Ex” (Recognition, Evaluation, and Decision-Making Exercise carried out by New York City, Office of Emergency Management, Fire Department of New York, NY Police Department, FEMA, and the FBI). And this occurs a little bit beforehand. I separate the drills that are taking place on 9/11 from the ones taking place beforehand. But the ones beforehand are building up the capabilities, usually unbeknownst of most of the people involved, that are going to be unleashed on 9/11.
So the “Red-ex” scenario was “plane crashes and building collapses in New York City.” Now doesn’t this sound pretty much like the attack on the World Trade Center and the controlled demolition that followed?
Faulker: When were they drilling “Red-Ex”, before or on the day of?
Tarpley: “Red-Ex” was May 11, 2001. That’s the preparation and then the actual operation is National Reconnaissance Office drill, Chantilly, Virginia, on the morning of.
Let’s do one more which I think is important to the main features. The event at the Pentagon. People are going in circles about this. One of the first things that was known about the Pentagon, within about two or three weeks, my friend, Thierry Meyssan, of the Voltaire Network of France, had come out with his analysis which soon became a book. There was no Boeing at the Pentagon. And of course there wasn’t. What there is is a flying object which is some kind of a cruise missile, unmanned aerial vehicle, drone aircraft, or something of the sort, which does hit the Pentagon and does create some damage. Now there is also an argument where there are explosive charges inside the building. It’s possible. But the main thing is that there was a flying object because people did see something. And this is a drill called Amalgam Virgo 01. That was carried out on June 1st to 2nd, 2001.
Amalgam Virgo 01 is “U.S.-Canada multi-agency drill conducted by NORAD, SEADS (Southeast Air Defense Sector), Coast Guard, Army, Navy” and the scenario is an “unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) drone launched from rogue freighter in Gulf of Mexico or cruise missile from a barge in the Atlantic Ocean” and it involves also testing a certain specific radar. So I think something like this is what happened at the Pentagon. In other words, it (missile or whatever) can be launched from a body of water. It can be launched from under water. It can be launched from a mobile truck. Once you get a cruise missile into the air, it’s almost impossible for the average person to detect. What you see then is the explosion.
So that’s the Pentagon. I see people are wasting their time about some aircraft: “Did it go north of the gas station or south of the gas station.” I think this is typical of the swamp of triviality and irrelevancy that this entire research effort has foundered into over the past two or three years. Mainly because what we’re looking for with 9/11 is not technical analysis. You know, these endless technical debates about the temperature of steel and all these other things. These are interesting and can be continued, but not with the sectarianism and the narrow-minded that has been done.
The main evidence is political. Mystery stories are not “how-done-its.” They are “who-done-its.” And the “who,” in this case, is the rogue network, and they do it acting through the drills. So the merit of the drills is it puts everything back on the political plane where it belongs rather than the apolitical, hyper-technical plane. I call the direction of the 9/11 Truth Movement over recent years is hyper-technical triviality or hyper-technical avoidance of the main political questions. Because the main thing is what do you learn from this that is of permanent value? Political lessons of permanent value don’t just revolve around the temperature of steel. How do you get ready for the next one?
Faulker: In the first several years after 9/11, all of the discussion among researchers and citizenry was about the politics and the capability and who benefited, etc. But in these last few years, it’s become highly technical, with the demolitions.
Tarpley: Yes, and basically I think the controlled demolition, the nanno-thermite story associated with Professor Steven Jones, I think this is broadly plausible. I think this is probably all in the right direction. But you also have a lot of other people who are interested in the role of an intellectual Gestapo, saying we cannot entertain the idea that there was no Boeing at the Pentagon or other things. And they try to exclude people and they try to vilify and slander them, with the result that this movement is largely falling apart.
One of the permanent products of the 9/11 truth movement was newspaper here in Washington called the Rock Creek Free Press, which was founded by the DC 9/11 truth group. Well, that newspaper has now ceased publication. After five years they’ve given up.
It also has to do with letting Cass Sunstein take over your movement. Cass Sunstein, you’ll remember, wrote this article a couple years back where he demanded the “cognitive infiltration” of the 9/11 truth movement. This guy is now sitting in the White House. His wife, Samantha Power, is the person who ran the de-stabilization of Tunisia and Egypt. She was sending orders to Field Marshall Tantawi in Cairo telling him to get Mubarak out.
So Cass Sunstein, and he wanted the cognitive infiltration. And it’s clear that that’s not going to be done necessarily by people who come on as neocons and war-mongers and racists and militarists. It’s going to be carried out by people who come under “left cover.” Because that’s the secret of the whole “Age of Obama,” is that you can do bigger and better crimes under left cover than you can under reactionary and neocon auspices. So a lot of these dubious characters who emerged in the 9/11 truth movement in 2006 and 2007 and then began banning and slandering and excluding the other people who had been prominent in the movement before that. So you have to ask yourself: Isn’t this an example of Cass Sunstein?
Plus, of course, when you get to wiki-leaks, it couldn’t be clearer. You’ve got Julian Assange, the great wiki-leaks artist, and his view of 9/11 is that it annoys him that people are interested in 9/11. In other words, the major covert operation of the age, he finds irrelevant. And he wants you look into his stories which then all turn out to be things that help the imperialist cause. That Ben-Ali is corrupt, that Gaddafi has a Ukrainian nurse, that Mubarak is corrupt, that Berlusconi is no good, that Karzai is no good, that Putin is no good, and so forth. But nothing that hurts anybody in London or Washington or Tel Aviv. But plenty that hurt their intended victims. So I think that’s sort of the idea.
Plus, the general idea is that the Obama regime, the Obama campaign, planned in many ways as a covert operation, a “color revolution,” it’s certainly that, sucked all the oxygen out of the room. So that not just the peace movement has collapsed but the 9/11 truth movement has pretty much collapsed too.
Faulkner: What is “Angel is next?” What are your sources for “Angel is next?”
Webster: Oh, “Angel is next” is one of the most important pieces of political evidence that we have. It’s the warning that was issued to Bush. The idea that Bush was the Svengali who was running all these things is absolutely absurd. Bush is an expendable pawn in the middle of all this. And it’s worth mentioning that in that chapter that I have about “Angel is Next:” In the morning of 9/11 at this Longboat Key Resort in Florida where Bush was staying there is something going on that looks sort of like an assassination attempt against Bush. Which is the arrival of a truck load of a camera team from some part of the Middle East who say they’ve got an appointment to do an interview with Bush, and they are sent away. They’re not arrested, they are just sent away. So there is a whole series of strange events in the night between the 10th and the 11th of September.
But specifically, by the time Bush is in that school room reading “My Pet Goat” to the elementary school students, the big scandal there is that the Secret Service is supposed to pick him up physically and get him out of there as soon as they know that the U.S. is under attack. They’re not supposed to let him stay there because his whereabouts are very widely known. They’re supposed to get him out of there. And they don’t do it. So we should be interviewing the people in the secret service who are responsible for that.
Then when he gets up into his airplane he’s getting these threatening messages. “Angel is next.” Meaning “Air Force One is going to be the next victim unless you do what we want.” And this is not coming in on a crank call. It’s coming in on secure communications and it’s coming with a series of code words and other evidence which indicate that it’s a faction that cuts across the main power agencies, the Pentagon, the CIA, the DIA, the NSA, and so forth. They’re all in on the coup and they are sending Bush these warnings that they want him to do something. Notice in the first speech that he gives this statement. He doesn’t say anything about terrorism, he doesn’t say anything about terrorism, he doesn’t say anything about Bin Laden or Al Qaeda. This is what they want. They want him to go on television and say Bin Laden, Bin Laden, Bin Laden, Al Qaeda, Al Qaeda, Al Qaeda. War of civilizations starts now. We’ll be attacking soon. This is what they want.
You could say they want an attack on Afghanistan. What they are really looking for is an attack on Pakistan. And you’ll remember that in October, 2001, we had this blood-curdling ultimatum from the U.S. to Pakistan delivered by this thug, Richard Armitage, where he says (ie., the U.S. says to Pakistan) “If you don’t give us fly-over, bases, the use of your transportation systems, in other words, if you don’t let us run wild across your territory any way we want, we’ll bomb you back into the stone age.” That was the immediate aftermath in terms of Pakistan.
The U.S. is not on the border of Pakistan because Pakistan wanted it. Even though Mushariff was pretty much a U.S. asset, he had to receive this ultimatum in order to do it.
Faulkner: Webster, in addition to the United States Air Force and the removal of many planes to other parts of the world so they were not on duty and ready to defend on September 11th, what about the diversion of counter-intelligence to Monterrey, California? What can you tell us about that?
Webster: Well, this reminds us of the JFK movie where the Fletcher Prouty character, one of the top people of Army intelligence, is sent to the South Pole in time for the JFK assassination which is going to be in Texas. In this case, the entire FBI, CIA, anti-terrorist task force, with all their equipment, all their helicopters and everything else, are sent to Monterrey California, very far from New York and Washington, right on that day. So that entire capability, which might have made some difference, was simply diverted out of the picture. So they all end up in California and they can’t get back. Because they have to arrange special military aircraft which are very much in demand and they don’t get the priority that they wanted. I guess the priority was to send members of the Bin Laden family out of the country, but not these people. They end up spending quite a while in Monterrey California when they would have been better deployed in this Eastern corridor as it turned out.
Faulkner: Well, right, because all of the planes had been grounded.
Tarpley: Right. So they end up there. That’s another drill. Maybe I can tick off a few others. Just a few other leading drills. There’s a whole array of drills in the late 1990’s which involve using airplanes as weapons against buildings. Condoleezza Rice was a liar. Bush of course lied. Just a couple of examples. Richard Clark in 1998 did an exercise with a Lear jet that was loaded with explosives and attacked Washington D.C. We have NORAD drills in 2000 with the scenario: “terrorist crashes Federal Express plane into the headquarters of the UN.” They did that once in the conventional mode and in the second case, with weapons of mass destruction on the plane. We had “Pentagon mass casualty exercise” in October, 2000: “commercial airplane hits the Pentagon.” Interesting is the whole question of transponders. What happens when these planes turn off their transponders? That’s covered by an FAA drill in the year December, 2000. An aircraft coming out of Ohio turns its transponder off. Not so different from things that actually happened.
The attack on the Pentagon is also prepared by Positive Force 01 involving NORAD and a dozen other agencies. This is in April, 2001. The scenario is “a terrorist group hijacks a commercial airliner and flies it into the Pentagon.” But it’s also combined with “continuity of government.” “Continuity of government” (COG) is shorthand for the establishment of a dictatorship, as we’ll get to in just a minute.
The invasion of Afghanistan is prepared by a drill. Unified Vision 01. This is joint forces central command, Special Forces Command and 40 other agencies. This is essentially the preparation of a land-locked country where the U.S. has no bases and no nearby bases and how do you get in and how do you operate?
Amalgam Virgo 02. This is one that was scheduled for somewhat later. But this gives us an idea of how 9/11 is done. This scenario calls for “a Delta commercial airliner with real Delta pilots, the passengers are actors, and the FBI provides the hijackers.” And I would say Mohammed Atta is probably somebody from FBI central casting for this kind of thing. Now that we’re talking about the patsies, let’s also also mention the question of “patsy management,” “patsy recruiting,” and so forth.
In my view, his is Able Danger. The big annual anti-terror drill is Able Warrior. Able Danger, Able Warrior. Drills come in pairs. One is attack. One is defense. If Able Warrior is the defense, Able Danger may be the attack. And if you want to simulate an attack in a drill, what do you need? You need a bunch of patsies, except these patsies are very unstable specimens, right? They’re psychotics, fanatics, misfits, double-agents, drug addicts, criminal types, whatever they are. They’ve got to be monitored. And one way to monitor them is with data mining. And I take it that’s what Able Danger was. This is the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Special Forces Command. Whenever you see the Special Forces Command, we’re close to this question of terrorists who are also patsies.
Inside Able Danger is “Stratus Ivy.” That’s to operate on patsies out of the box and “Doorhop Gouty,” even more secret, inside that. It’s like the Russian dolls. The remarks made by Congressman Weldon of Pennsylvania were that the goal of this had been to manipulate the terrorists. Well, “manipulating terrorists” means being a case officer and being a terrorist controller. And we’ve also got the famous P2OG; “Proactive, Pre-emptive Operations Group,” “stimulating reactions of terrorists.” Well, to stimulate, that’s the same thing. You’re manipulating them. You’re getting them to do what you want. That’s exactly the task of a case officer who’s running a terrorist.
Faulker: Now you mention Congressman Weldon. What happened to him?
Tarpley: Well, the typical. What happens to people in this who bring up things that the rogue network doesn’t like, is that if they’re elected officials, they’re vilified and slandered and there’s a threat to indict them. And then when once they’re out of office, there’s no trial. This happened to Senator Robert Toricelli of New Jersey, who was the first elected official of any note in the Congress to demand an immediate board of inquiry. And in his case, he was accused of being a Mafioso. Except then once he was out of office he lost his nomination and his election. There was never an indictment. There was never a trial. Weldon was the same story. He was accused of corruption, his family was corrupt and all this. And then after that election in which he lost his seat, then nothing ever happened. So that’s important to note.
The acceptance of this entire scenario by the average person is also an important feature. And here the cell phone conversations play a very important role. These are these heart-rending cell phone conversations of close relatives, husbands, wives, and so forth, you know: “I love you, I love the children, and now I’m on a hijacked airplane.” And this of course was very effective. Maybe people would be interested to know that that entire complex was drilled before the fact with a special drill covering that. In other words, you’ve got to have your “Jessica Lynch story.” You’ve got to have your “Kuwait incubator babies.” You’ve got to have this entire thing reduced to the level of the average person. You might even say, of little people, like you, for many people. So that you can understand. For most people, abstractions like geo-politics, Eurasia, Islamic fundamentalism, this mean very little. But everybody can understand these tearful conversations.
So here we have, right before the fact, on August 31, 2001: U.S. Department of Transportation hijacking exercise. With the U.S. Department of Transportation Crisis Management Center drilling hijacks, including “simulated phone calls from the airplanes.” And of course what that means is this entire question of how could these calls be made, who was really doing the talking, and a whole series of other unanswered questions. The contradictions inside the story. Why Theodore Olson played such an important role in this, and on and on. I’ve always been very skeptical about these and others have looked into them. And I think the obvious avenue is to look at that drill.
Now, with all of these going on and there are of course more… Let’s then look at the really scary stuff. The outcome of 9/11, in terms of international politics, is that the U.S. essentially issues an ultimatum to the world saying we are seizing Afghanistan now and we’re also going to put Pakistan under limited sovereignty. We’re going to essentially do to Pakistan what they tried to do to Serbia three years before. The Serbs had said no. At least had said no for quite a while. But in the case of Pakistan, they wanted to be able to run wild all over the country and begin terror operations there. Which is what we see now.
How do you do that? Well, the main danger is Russia with Putin. And here you have a very energetic and courageous leader. And the problem with Afghanistan is that if the United States says, “guess what, we’re seizing Afghanistan,” Russia could easily say, “no, you’re not. And here are our H bombs and if you try it, we’ll blow your head off.” Now that’s an extreme scenario but it’s possible. So what you’ve got to do if you’re organizing this, as the invisible government did, is you’ve got to intimidate Russia. And this was told to me by General Rebechof, who was in command in Moscow that morning. That before any hijackings had occurred on the morning of 9/11, the Russian high command looked at the United States and saw an all-out thermonuclear war deployment, B-52’s in the air, submarines ready, missiles ready, everything ready for a launch. And what was that? Well, it’s obviously designed to intimidate them to begin with.
This is Global Guardian. This is U.S. STRATCOM. It’s the main nuclear war fighting Air Force Bases; Offutt AFB, Nebraska, Barksdale AFB, Louisiana, Minot AFB, North Dakota, Whiteman AFB, Missouri. It’s an Armageddon drill and it’s designed to deter Russia and China during the invasion of Afghanistan and Pakistan. And this includes Amalgam Warrior which is another large-scale, live-fly air defense, air intercept drill. The air intercept of course means that you are beefing up the intercept capabilities vis a vis Russia, in particular. You’ve got nothing in the Washington to Boston area but you’ve go plenty of things up around the North Pole where the Russians would be coming. You’ve also got two exercises of which nothing is known: Crown Vigilance of the Air Combat Command and Apollo Guardian of the U.S. Space Command, and I couldn’t find any details about any of those.
Now in the middle of the Global Guardian you have what I call the “backdoor to thermonuclear war.” In other words, suppose the Russians say, “Yes, we see your thermonuclear forces ready to go and we understand that you want to seize Afghanistan, but we’re still not going to let you do it. We’re going to call your bluff. What are you going to do next?”
And at that point, you’ve got to be able to actually launch thermonuclear missiles. And there’s good indication that the rogue network does have this ability. They’ve prepared for that too. This is within the framework of Guardian. And this is all from published sources more or less in the main stream. Within the framework of this, there’s the simulation of what you could call the “denial of service” attack on the U.S. STRATCOM, used to be the Strategic Air Command. So the enemy forces war-dialed the STRATCOM telephone, fax and maybe computer systems and (this is the key) a “bad insider” has access to a key system of command, control, and communication. And this “bad insider,” if he’s got access to command, may be able to launch nuclear missiles. So what happens if the pretend “bad insider” becomes a real “bad insider” (i.e., the rogue network) and uses his pretend access to the C cubed (command, control, and communication) to make it into a real access to the C cubed and actually has the ability to launch a missile.
Because you want to able to do this without reference to Bush. Because you can’t count on him. He may be out to lunch. He may have had a plane crashed into Air Force One.
And finally the last piece of this is, if Bush refuses to go along… suppose goes on television and says: “A military coup is going on in the United States and I’m going to fight it because I’m the President and I believe in the Constitution.” You never know what might happen. Suppose then he’s eliminated. The inherent threat of “Angel is next” is that airplanes would come and shoot down Air Force One. And there’s a very tense kabookee between Air Force One and the Air Force fighters that are either not there to escort it or they show up and then they act strangely. There’s a whole can of worms about that. But suppose Bush falls by the wayside. Suppose Cheney has a heart attack. What do you do then? Can you then look to the Speaker of the House? What are you going to do? Is it going to be the president pro tem of the Senate? This is not what the rogue network wants.
So I think they’ve got an emergency government waiting in the wings. And this is the National Airborne’s Operation Center. U.S. STRATCOM has a Strategic Advisory Committee of which almost nothing is known. And this is at Offutt, Nebraska, Andrews, Maryland, Wright-Patterson, Ohio. They’ve got three of the “doomsday aircraft” in the air. “Doomsday aircraft” equipped with the Looking Glass Communication system. And the passengers. We’ve got a real “eminence gris” of the invisible government, Brent Scowcroft, is on one of the planes. And you’ve got Warren Buffet at Offutt Air Force Base. Now if Bush and Cheney fall by the wayside you might have had, late in the day, the declaration of the Committee of Public Safety of some kind, you know, the coup out in the open at that point. Maybe featuring the high government officials, Scowcroft and somebody like Warren Buffet, a business leader, I guess they’d say. Plus others. There may have had others at these places.
We’ve also got, worth noting, is a special drill ordered by General Larry Arnold, the NORAD Commander. He’s got two AWACs planes, from Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma, have been sent to Washington, D.C. where the government is and Florida, where Bush is. And that looks like a kind of surveillance or overview of everything that is happening. Monitoring. They’d have their own independent, a little bit above the ground view of what’s happening.
So generally speaking, it’s the form of a military coup with the help of high civilian government officials. And I’m sure the center of gravity is on the civilian side, especially when you add in the Wall Street factor. Civilian meaning Wall Street centered.”
Certainly, the 46+ drills that were operating before and during September 11, 2001 abundantly prove that “9/11 was an inside job.” No other conclusion is possible. The most obvious questions, then, are:
1) How is it possible that the various military and intelligence structures that were originally put in place to protect America have now turned against the American people?
2) If Operation 9/11 was an inside job, as proven by the above information, how can it be possible that Israel and Zionist Jews/Masons did 9/11, as is also proven on this website?
In my 2002 article, “Reflections on the Origins of 9/11: Three Scenarios,” I quoted Brigadier General Smedley Butler, who spoke these words to the American Legion in 1933:
The trouble with America is that when the dollar only earns 6% over here, it gets restless and goes overseas to get 100%. Then the flag follows the dollar and the soldiers follow the flag. There are only two things we should fight for. One is the defense of our homes and the other is the Bill of Rights. War for any other reason is simply a racket. There isn’t a trick in the racketeering bag that the military gang is blind to. It has its “finger men” to point out enemies, its “muscle men” to destroy enemies, its “brain men” to plan war preparations, and a “Big Boss”, Super-Nationalistic-Capitalism. It may seem odd for me, a military man, to adopt such a comparison. Truthfulness compels me to. I spent 33 years…. being a high-class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and the bankers. In short, I was a racketeer for capitalism. I helped purify Nicaragua for the international banking house of Brown Brothers in 1909-1912. I helped make Mexico… safe for American oil interests in 1916. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City (Bank) boys to collect revenue in. I helped in the rape of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefit of Wall Street. In China in 1927, I helped see to it that Standard Oil went its way unmolested. I had… a swell racket. I might have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was operate a racket in three cities. I operated on three continents.
In his 1961 farewell address, President Eisenhower descried the fact that the military-industrial-(Congressional) complex, even then, was by then even farther out of control:
Our military organization today bears little relation to that known by any of my predecessors in peacetime, or indeed by the fighting men of World War II or Korea. Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United States corporations.
This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence – economic, political, even spiritual – is felt in every city, every Statehouse, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.
In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.
Akin to, and largely responsible for the sweeping changes in our industrial-military posture, has been the technological revolution during recent decades. In this revolution, research has become central, it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government.
Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been overshadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers.
The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present – and is gravely to be regarded. Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.
It was almost as if Eisenhower could foresee that government itself, emboldened by its enormous scientific and technological advantages over the citizenry would sooner or later turn against the American Republic and try to destroy the U.S. Constitution. I submit, however, that Ike had no crystal ball. Rather, he was intimately familiar with the very individuals who then led the “secret” or “shadow government” of America. Here I refer to the Rockefeller-Harriman-Dulles-Bush-Wall Street faction that is intimately connected to the Rothschild family and the City of London/British Empire. Indeed, Eisenhower himself was golf partner to Prescott Bush of Yale’s Skull and Bones (“Order of Death”) secret society, one of the most important American branches of the German (Jewish) Illuminati (aka “Order of Death”). As demonstrated in my article, “The Bush Dynasty of Death; Four Generations of Wall Street War-Making and War-Profiteering” (https://911nwo.com/?p=2079), the Bush family is perhaps more intimately connected to America’s “military-industrial-intelligence” establishment than any other single family.
The infamous “shadow government” is known by various names, including the “New World Order.” Tarpley refers to it as the “rogue network.” Others call it the “cryptocracy” (rule by secrecy), “plutocracy” (rule by the rich), “pathocracy” (rule by psychopaths), and “pedophocracy” (rule by pedophiles). Some researchers trace its origin to Cecil Rhodes’ Round Table groups in Britain. Others trace its origins back further to 16th-century British Rosicrucians, John Dee and Francis Bacon. Others trace the origins of this cabal to founding of the Bavarian Illuminati in 1776. Others trace it to the Masons, the Theosophists, the New Age religions, etc. Still others consider that the modern core of this sociopathic cabal includes the Nazi International. Christian researcher and author Texe Marrs conclude that the core of this nefarious and destructive group is Jewish.
In “Holy Serpent of the Jews,” Marrs summarizes the geo-political reality behind Operation 9/11:
“The Jewish neocons who control America and are now implementing the New World Order realize that their historic mission is to invent wars and to destroy culture. By way of this “creative destruction,” the neocons expect that Satan will be encouraged to establish his long sought for Kingdom on earth. Michael Ledeen, a necon who is well-known U.S. intelligence and foreign policy operative, explains this historic mission of the kabbalistic Jews:
“Creative destruction is our middle name, within our society and abroad. We tear down the Old Order every day, from business to science, literature, art, architecture, and cinema to politics and the law. Our enemies have always hated this whirlwind of energy and creativity which menaces their traditions (whatever they may be) and shames them for their inability to keep pace…. We must destroy them to advance our historic mission.”
The neocon Jews drew the first American blood of the 21st century in the 9/11 airstrike. They banded together, forming the “Project for a New American Century.” In a special report that soon became the basis for the foreign policy of the Bush-Cheney Administration, the necons said that there needed to an attack on America similar to Pearl Harbor. After such a shocking surprise attack, Americans could be easily marshaled to fight terrorists and governments around the globe. Thus would the military supremacy of America, chief ally of Zionist Israel, be established.
The 9/11 assaults took place shortly after this report was released, and the world situation has never been the same. The U.S. is continually seeking “Ordo Ab Chao” in the world. Michael Ledeen must be very proud. As we read in the “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion,” Protocol 13: “Who will ever suspect then that all these people were stage-managed by us according to a political plan which no one has so much as guessed at in the course of many generations.” The mission of the Jews is building of a New World. “Tikkun Olam,” the “mending or repairing of the world,” means that the Jews will use “creative destruction” to destroy the structures and cultures of this world, a process in which they are currently heavily engaged.”
Is it possible that in some manner, all of the groups mentioned above are involved; American military-intelligence, the British and American Round Table Groups, the Nazi International, the secret societies, the Jews? Yes, it is, as demonstrated in the research posted on this website. The following statement by German physicist, Harald Kautz Vella, may provide an important spiritual overview of our current situation:
“…. when you look at the entire thing, and you try to find solutions to it, you realize that everybody who is involved on the different levels is making the same mistake. It is of the Luciferic game. “Let me participate in your power, and I will serve you. I don’t know want to know what you are doing. I don’t want to stand in my own responsibility. Just let me participate from your power and I will serve.” This is the Luciferic deal everybody’s doing. And we are doing this by going to vote, the government, that is taking care of all the pipes we’re connected to. But we let go of our responsibility and we let them do. They are giving control to the military domain; the military domain is giving control to the intelligence community; the intelligence community is giving control to the Black Magicians, the Black Magicians are giving control to the demons, and the demons lost control to their AI. (ETK- referring to “artificial intelligence” or to Satan himself?)”
Please note that Vella’s summary is completely verified by former military “psychic warrior,” (now Christian), William Dean Ross in his articles:
“The Hidden Evil Agenda” (www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/staticwritings/evilagenda.htm)
“Riders on the Storm” (www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/staticwritings/riderstorm.htm)
“Catch A Falling Star” (www.hiddenmysteries.org/themagazine/vol13/articles/…)
Referring again to Vella’s statement about Black Magicians and demons (above), it has been abundantly demonstrated on this website that the basis of the religion of Judaism is not the Old Testament, as most assume, but rather, it is the Babylonian Talmud and the Kabbalah, the system of black magic which derives from ancient Babylonian and Egyptian Baal (aka Moloch or Satan)-worship. Hence, the “Black Magicians” of Vella’s statement above must be the same Jewish-Masonic-Satanists identified on this website in Appendix 8: From The Trail of the Serpent (1936) by Inquire Within (https://911nwo.com/?p=3629).
De we require more proof of the veracity of Jesus Christ’s message? Jesus referred to the Pharisaic Jews of his days as a “generation of vipers” (or “race of serpents”), “of their father, the Devil,” and the “Synagogue of Satan.” Amazingly, it appears that in the very process of discovering the culprits of Operation 9/11 we have uncovered the “Mystery of Iniquity” of the New Testament. Certainly, then, the New World Order then is synonymous with the Kingdom of the Antichrist foretold in the Book of Revelation.