Why Does The “War on Terror” Serve Western Policy?
July 20, 2015 By: Jay Dyer
From Benghazi to Turkey, the ISIS “supply lines” are directly from NATO-controlled territory, and apparently it never occurs to the minds of western media to ask where, in fact, the so-called Islamic State obtains their arms. The reason for this is obvious, as it would demonstrate that the Islamic State is not a homegrown, indigenous Wahhabist extremist group, but a Western creation, funded and aided like Al Qaeda since its inception, as Carter and Brzezinski openly discussed. Not much has changed in the international terror theater since 1979, save the targets. Counterpunch noted over a decade ago:
“Q: The former director of the CIA, Robert Gates, stated in his memoirs [“From the Shadows”], that American intelligence services began to aid the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan 6 months before the Soviet intervention. In this period you were the national security adviser to President Carter. You therefore played a role in this affair. Is that correct?
Brzezinski: Yes. According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahadeen began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, 24 Dec 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded until now, is completely otherwise: Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I wrote a note to the president in which I explained to him that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention.”
Concerning the aiding and funding of the updated Mujahideen-Al Qaeda-ISIS brand, Tony Cartalucci comments:
The London Telegraph would report in their 2013 article, “CIA ‘running arms smuggling team in Benghazi when consulate was attacked’,” that: “[CNN] said that a CIA team was working in an annex near the consulate on a project to supply missiles from Libyan armouries to Syrian rebels.”
Weapons have also come from Eastern Europe, with the New York Times reporting in 2013 in their article, “Arms Airlift to Syria Rebels Expands, With Aid From C.I.A.,” that:
From offices at secret locations, American intelligence officers have helped the Arab governments shop for weapons, including a large procurement from Croatia, and have vetted rebel commanders and groups to determine who should receive the weapons as they arrive, according to American officials speaking on the condition of anonymity.
And while Western media sources continuously refer to ISIS and other factions operating under the banner of Al Qaeda as “rebels” or “moderates,” it is clear that if billions of dollars in weapons were truly going to “moderates,” they, not ISIS would be dominating the battlefield.
Recent revelations have revealed that as early as 2012 the United States Department of Defense not only anticipated the creation of a “Salafist Principality” straddling Syria and Iraq precisely where ISIS now exists, it welcomed it eagerly and contributed to the circumstances required to bring it about.”
In terms of foreign policy, the target with ISIS is still Syria, as Washington elites have expounded through their Brookings Institute discussion of June 24, a rebound from the failed attempt by John Kerry to drum up support for war with Syria that fell flat due to the exposure of the laughable false flag “chlorine attack” propaganda pinned on Assad. Now ISIS is both the means and the raison d’etre for invading and saving Syria, in the classic problem-reaction-solution strategy the West never tires from enacting in the global “freedom” war.
The endless, eternal war on terror is a contrived strategy of tension the Atlanticist establishment has used for over a hundred years, dating back to the exploits of Harry St. John Philby, T.E. Lawrence and the British carving up of the Middle East and special relationship with Saudi Arabia. As mentioned, nothing has changed in the last century, other than the focal point of the terror attacks, as the Middle East must constantly be broken up, destabilized and reorganized into “micro-nations” more amenable to Washington’s corrupt corporate and ideological expansionist domination. Recent so-called “terror events” are merely dots on the long timeline of terror, a scripted narrative designed to remodel the American landscape as much as the Middle East, according to D.C. think tank machinations.
Saudi Arabia, is of course one of the world’s chief funders of terror, operating as a proxy for the western elites. Jordan, Qatar, the UAE, Oman, Bahrain and Kuwait are all “Gulf Cooperation nations,” arising from the aegis of the British Empire, and adopted under the U.S. empire. And what is constantly forgotten is the origin of this cadre’s alignment of the West through oil production was not merely the result of OPEC and Kissinger, it was in fact organized by Bilderberg: It was Bilderberg that organized the 70s OPEC oil debacle. Isn’t it curious the GCC pro-terror states are also western-supplying oil states? Citing William F. Engdahl in his A Century of War, Andrew Gavin Marshall writes:
“One enormous consequence of the ensuing 400 percent rise in OPEC oil prices was that investments of hundreds of millions of dollars by British Petroleum, Royal Dutch Shell [both present at Bilderberg] and other Anglo-American petroleum concerns in the risky North Sea could produce oil at a profit,” as “the profitability of these new North Sea oilfields was not at all secure until after the OPEC price rises.” In 2001, the former Saudi representative to OPEC, Sheik Ahmed Yamani, said, “’I am 100 percent sure that the Americans were behind the increase in the price of oil.
The oil companies were in real trouble at that time, they had borrowed a lot of money and they needed a high oil price to save them.” When he was sent by King Faisal to the Shah of Iran in 1974, the Shah said that it was Henry Kissinger who wanted a higher price for oil.” (136-7)
Heartland versus Rimland.
In other words, war is a racket, as General Smedley Butler famously stated, and the new “War on Terror” (TM) of our day is not new, but an updated version of the old British strategy of staving off Russia. Little has changed a century later, as the major power bloc of the West, the Atlanticists still charge forward according to the Mackinder Heartland doctrine that the western merchant/banking sea power must dominate and control the Eurasian “heartland” to ensure no Eastern rivalry. Through the export of Opium, China was subjugated, and through export of Marxism, both China and Russia experienced the havoc of western-born ideological materialism.
It is precisely this same utilitarian Anglo-empiricist, pragmatist philosophy that has ultimately turned on its own populace in a parasitical fashion unheard of for past empires. Promising sensual and economic utopia, the Bolshevik export to Russia on the part of the Atlantic banking power is not the top-down social engineering strategy of the corporate elite upon the U.S. population itself. The great delusion is that the West is “free,” when it is entering the realm of greater enslavement than Sovietism experienced. The only difference is the foolish western populace cannot grasp their enslavement is at the hands of Marxist corporations.
The central banks, the Fortune 100 and their shareholders love cultural Marxism and command and control, socialist economic models because it is the quickest way to consolidate wealth and transfer the actually valuable assets to the controlling oligarchy. In such a system, the opposition will inevitably all be titled “terrorists,” as the appellation is already being extended beyond radical Islamists. And after it extends beyond the average person, the conditioning will be so strong that any thoughts, words, actions or potential-pre-crime actions will also follow under the elastic notion of “terror.”
Terrorism is thus a social weapon, not of indigenous, individual “actors” and lone wolves, but stage managed dupes, patsies and tools of an international oligarchical cartel, as Orwell demonstrated in 1984 with the fictional villain of Immanuel Goldstein. Indeed, who funds these groups? (We saw who, above). The most obvious fact of the contradiction of the “War on Terror” (TM) is that it almost always works to further Washington’s domestic and geopolitical aims. Terror, then, is like Trotsky’s notion of perpetual war – perpetual war on the psyche of the globe (it’s a global war on terror), as a phase in the dialectical convergence on the path to global government. That is why terrorism serves western political aims.
TERROR THEATRE: The EU Babel, Brussels Attack Numerology & Media Fakery
By: Jay Dyer
Once again the ritual enactment of terror theatre has proven useful to the western establishment, with Europe once more the focus of a new round of psychological warfare – the mental attack that is “terror” (I am refraining from talking about actual deaths, since we will see no bodies or evidence of said deaths). What is actually dead is Europe, precisely because it long ago capitulated to the degenerate machinations of monied elites that long ago sought to replace the remnants and vestiges of traditional culture with masonic atheism, secularism and the Babel of the EU (conceived and drawn up long ago at Bilderberg through the Kalergi Plan).
Spiritually dead and rotting from a loss of tradition, it is no surprise the now toxic anti-culture of Europe has being co-opted by the Anglo-American system (through NATO and other globalist entities) to function as a means to both break down both Islam and the vestiges of Christianity through multi-cult clash, migrant movement and relocation, a warfare strategy. A great way to do this is mixing cultures and stoking the fire with synthetic terror.
It is no surprise, then, the thoroughly liberalized populations are unable to cope with the juggernaut of psy ops levelled against them, particularly when faced with establishment aided, funded and engineered terror against its own population. It should be first evident the radical Jihadi model of Al Qaeda and ISIS both share the similar patterns of absurdity, contradiction and Hollywood-esque scripting we’ve seen in past episodes of Terror Theater.
After months of staged ISIS videos and “beheadings,” Charlie Hebdo, the Paris Attacks, the string of US “terror” and mass “shootings,” a new installment has been concocted as a purported “revenge” on the part of ISIS for the capture of the so-called “mastermind” of the Paris event. Why, it sounds as if we are living through a season of Homeland or 24 – because we are, because the terror is scripted and engineered. As I wrote:
“We have also seen yet another ISIS “beheading” video that purports to kill two Japanese individuals following the silly ISIS “kid killer” production. However, as expected, these videos also demonstrate alteration and staging, adding to the long list of Hollywood productions, and even the Japanese government is speaking out about the apparent staging.”
ISIS beheading on Turkish TV drama?
Concerning the overriding plan and pattern for these “terror” events, we must look, not to radical Islam, but the NATO strategy of tension embodied in GLADIO and the stay behind units intended to sway public opinion away from “leftist” positions, into “right wing” order. While the Cold War tension is no longer relevant, what is relevant is the usefulness of the strategy of tension, particularly in relation to the replacement of the Cold War dialectic with the new one, the “clash of civilization” between western “Christianity” (read rotting, toxic culture) and “Islam” (read western intelligence-run and staged radical Jihadis). Concerning Gladio, Three Monkies summarizes the book, NATO’s Secret Armies:
“The existence of the network is a fact. It has, at this stage, been confirmed by numerous heads of state, by three parliamentary investigations (Italy, Belgium and Switzerland), and not least by a bizarre* denial and subsequent confirmation of its existence by NATO itself in 1990. And yet, apart from those involved in the network, very few people know for sure how the network functioned, or how it defined its own role. There is enough evidence and personal testimony to suggest, at best, casual links to right wing terrorist groups active throughout the ’70s and ’80s, and at worst that this network was itself responsible for implementing the so-called ‘strategy of tension’; that is the deliberate use of terrorism to scare the voting population of a given country into a rightward shift politically, towards a ‘law and order’ style government. The questions are unanswered because, even in the case of parliamentary investigations, when researching the subject one sooner or later runs up against official secrecy regulations. Underlining the ‘off limits’ nature of the subject, a NATO diplomat was quoted as saying, “I wouldn’t expect too many questions to be answered, even though the Cold War is over. If there were any links to terrorist organisations, that sort of information would be buried very deep indeed” [Reuters 15th November 1990].”
The recent Brussels attack demonstrates all the same patterns as all the other “attacks” we’ve highlighted. Before the event, we saw “warnings” of the coming wave of terror and threats from “ISIS” that these attacks would come. None other than insider and President of Turkey, Erdogan himself spoke of the coming attack days beforehand, which is all the more ridiculous, given the fact that Turkey and the Erdogan regime have already been fingered as supporting ISIS, the supposed entity behind the attack, and profiting from the oil. Turkey, you’ll recall is a NATO country and likely the origin of the ISIS “training” and thus the funneling into Syria for destabilization. Belgium, of course, is also the headquarters of both NATO and the EU, and despite “tips” concerning a coming terror attack (as is always the case), these tips go ignored – because terror is precisely the point. As I wrote last year:
“From Benghazi to Turkey, the ISIS “supply lines” are directly from NATO-controlled territory, and apparently it never occurs to the minds of Western media to ask where, in fact, the so-called Islamic State obtains their arms. The reason for this is obvious, as it would demonstrate that the Islamic State is not a homegrown, indigenous Wahhabist extremist group, but western creation, funded and aided like Al Qaeda since its inception, as Carter and Brzezinski openly discussed. Not much has changed in the international terror theater since 1979, save the targets.”
In Brussels, the official narrative is that two ISIS-affiliated men bombed a train station and a subway purportedly killing 31. The first curiosity that occurred to me was elucidated by Shawn Helton of 21st Century Wire – the events appear to be the same scripting as the London 7/7 bombing, targeting public transportation and a subway. In the wake of that attack, we saw the same story of missing “backpack man” on the run, while Rashid Aswat was reported to be working with MI5.
The date is also significant, with the numerology of 7/7 having an esoteric importance in relation to Crowley’s book of the same name, Liber OZ, or Liber 77. This is relevant because the date of the Brussels attack was 3/22, the number of the lodge known as Skull and Bones, with the second bombing occurring at 9:11 AM. For those who doubt the significance of the numerology, consider the curious incidents surrounding the Malaysian Plane fiasco I detailed here, noting the numerological elements of ciphers and cryptology:
JaysAnalysis has documented countless cases of film and television scripting being used for propaganda and psy ops in real covert operations, and this could be one of the more spectacular examples. Also of note are the numerological associations that are not coincidental. It should also be understood that according to the NSA itself in its scholarly publications, numerology and the occult have a long history of usage in cryptography and intelligence communications. Twilight Language as investigated on this blog is confirmed as a real, legitimate form of cryptography in examples such as this linked article. With all that in mind, and considering the propaganda and media blitz like this and this and this, while stories like this are ignored, it is not a stretch to consider the MH17 flight downing’s twilight language as a classic Mi6/CIA calling card.
Noting the parallels with Brussels and the previous Hebdo and Paris attacks, Helton comments again:
“Looking at the clues in Paris, leads directly to Brussels…
Following the first orchestrated Paris attack in January of 2015, Belgium was already in the periphery concerning terror networks, as a weapons supply cache was causally revealed by the Wall Street Journal, as well as a dark underground network of apparent militants:
“An official with the Belgian federal prosecutor’s office said that a man presented himself to the police in Charleroi, a city in southern Belgium, saying he bought a car from Mr. Coulibaly’s wife, Hayat Boumeddiene, who is now believed to be living in Islamic State-controlled territory in Syria. Ms. Boumeddiene left France for Turkey a few days before the Paris attacks occurred.” The police then searched the man’s home and discovered evidence that he was involved in weapons trafficking, the official said. A judge ordered the arrest of the man, who wasn’t identified. But officials say it is unclear whether Mr. Coulibaly bought any weapons from the man.”
Said and Cherif Kouachi named in the Charlie Hebdo attack, purchased AK-47 assault rifles and rocket launchers “for less than €5,000 near Gare du Midi, one of the main Brussels railway stations, located in a gritty area of the city.”
Beyond these details, the other oddities and anomalies that stood out to me were the largest drill in UK history a month ago, as reported by RT – costing a whopping 800k pounds, involving 1,000 actors staging an eerily similar attack of a subway. If this were all, it might be coincidental, but following this mainstream news reported various new agencies running the wrong CCTV footage not once, but twice, from different “events” that purport to be the Brussels attack. It goes without saying this shows we cannot trust the mainstream footage and reporting of the event. To add insult to injury, it also emerged mainstream news photographers were also caught staging emotional scenery following the attack.
And if that wasn’t ridiculous enough, the absurd tale of the Mormon Missionary named “Mason” gained viral traction by reporting the young zealot had been in attendance at not one, not two, but three recent terror spectacles. Helton again comments, highlighting the absurdity of the theater of terror, and when read in light of the above analysis, it becomes clearer the strategy of terror is advantageous to the degenerate establishment precisely for the purpose of breaking down both cultures – Islam through toxic Americanism and annihilating whatever skeleton remains of the “Christian west” (despite the stilted narrative of the “AltRight” which laughs and mocks the mere mention of false flags, yet never examines media fakery):
Perhaps the most bizarre and extremely questionable story to come out since the Brussels attacks, were the reports of Mason Wells, a Mormon missionary, who allegedly survived three separate terror attacks since 2013 – Boston, Paris and Brussels.
Back in 2013, just after the Boston marathon bombing, the Washington Post ran an article including some interesting statistics about terror directly from the National Counterterrorism Center, which stated that:
“In the last five years, the odds of an American being killed in a terrorist attack have been about 1 in 20 million (that’s including both domestic attacks and overseas attacks).”
Here’s the Mason Wells story, as reported by ABC news…
Just another coincidence? At those odds, it’s a near impossibility, and more likely we are looking at a role player of sorts.”
As a closing note, I would recommend this analysis as a good thesis as to what might connect, not just Brussels and Islamic terror, but the association of Olav Thon with both Breivik and Brussels (h/t John Adams):