Appendix 11: On the Terms “Conspiracy Theory” and “Anti-Semitism”
(October 14, 2014)
The Order of the Illuminati… has hidden behind the ‘conspiracy theory’ lie for so long that contemporary exposures (of its crimes)…. come as a bleak surprise to its crazed leadership. As is well known, anyone who ventures into this undergrowth is immediately excoriated variously as a ‘nutcase’, a ‘maverick’, or else a ‘conspiracy theorist’. According to this fatuous perception, there is no such thing as a conspiracy. In denigrating all conspiracies as fantasies by definition, so that further inquiry is thereby precluded, the Illuminati have successfully hidden their own mammoth conspiracy which is of proportions without historical precedent, from view: or so they foolishly imagine.
Christopher Storey, The New UnderWorld Order (2006)
The terms “anti-semitic,” conspiracy-theorist,” and “conspiracy nut” are used as pejorative slurs to discredit anyone who uses of the term, Jew, or who suggests that a crime might have been carried out by a conspiracy or by conspirators. By definition, a conspiracy is a crime plotted and carried out by two or more people. In fact, this is the most common type of crime in the world. Indeed, most individuals incarcerated in America’s prisons today were convicted of participating in some form of conspiracy. And as demonstrated throughout this website and especially in Part IV and Appendix 6 and Zionism Quotes, some of the most habitual and effective of all criminal conspirators tend to be Jews. Indeed, this website demonstrates abundantly that, as Douglas Reed (1956), “Judaism is a political program disguised as religion.” And the political program is to take over the world; a project which requires endlessly plotting and hatching criminal conspiracies against non-Jews (aka “gentiles, “goyim,” and “beasts”). Notwithstanding these facts, through propaganda and selective usage, these terms have become emotionally-laden slurs that are used discredit and defame anyone who calls attention to the obvious facts that conspiracies are commonplace in the world and that Jews are among the most persistent effective conspirators! These terms today serve important functions for the power elite: They are used to deflect criticism away from the guilty and heap ridicule upon anyone who dares tell the truth. Both the terms “anti-semitic,” and “conspiracy-theorist” tend to evoke fear and loathing against the individuals who are so labeled (libeled?). Thus, the fear of being labelled in this manner tends to effectively stop thought, discourse, crticism, and further investigation.
The terms “conspiracy theory” and “conspiracy theorist” emerged shortly after JFK was assassinated. They were widely used by government and media as put-downs
to ridicule/discourage anyone from questioning of the official “lone nut”/”Oswald did it” theory. Prior to this event, the terms were not commonly used as pejorative slurs.
The term “anti-semitic” is a confusing one. To understand it better, let’s first determine what a “semite” is. According to Wikipedia, “semite” refers to a group of languages spoken in Western Asia/the Near East. Thus, “a Semite is a member of any of various ancient and modern Semitic-speaking peoples originating in the Near East,” including:
• Ammonites Amorites
• Edomites, Ethiopian Semites
Hence, the speakers of “semitic” languages, and by extrapolation, “semites,” include over a billion Arabs, Moslems, Africans and all kinds of people of Middle Eastern ethnicity, including Hebrews.
Through propaganda and modern conventional usage, these terms have morphed so that anyone who criticizes Jews or even mentions the word, Jew, may be labeled and slurred as “anti-semitic”- and this, by definition, is a serious insult. In effect, usage, or the threat of usage, of the term tends to deflect and prevent any criticism of Jews. Indeed, the term itself comprises a rather effective racist slur that can be used to denigrate and impugn the character of anyone who is critical of or opposed to Jews or any of their activities…… Thus, the popular usage of this term today serves to protect Jews from any serious scrutiny or criticism. In this manner, Jews have managed to become the one group that must not be criticized or suspected of any criminal activity. How could this have happened? Duh! Through their control of the financial system, Jews own government, politicians, education, and the media.
So let us examine how the terms “semitic” and “anti-semitic” morphed to their modern usage. Regarding the term “anti-semitic,” Metapedia says:
The term “anti-semite” was invented in 1860 by a Jew named Moritz Steinschneider, the son of a Talmudist born in Moravia. …. The socialist (Jew), Wilhelm Marr popularized the term in the 1870s with his “League of Anti-Semites,” applying it to himself in a positive sense primarily in his attacks on Jewish finance, but also in regard to their non-assimilationism in wider society.
OK, the confusion begins with the fact that the word “semitic” originally referred to a large group of Near Eastern languages. A Semite was considered an individual who spoke one of those languages. However, in the late 1800’s, some Jews invented the term “anti-semitic” and applied it to themselves in a positive sense. At that point, it was considered good to be “anti-semitic,” because Jews then, as ever, were extremely unpopular. (Of course, the historically consistent unpopularity of Jews is based on their own behavior, not on the “prejudices” of those who simply wish to defend themselves against Jewish aggression and well, conspiracies!)
To make matters even more confusing, recent DNA studies indicate that over 90% of modern “Jews” are “Ashkenazim” Jews of Turkish-Mongol genetic stock that come from the ancient (pre-10th century AD) Central Asian kingdom of Khazaria. Khazars are not genetically related to the ancient Hebrews and and their language, “Yiddish,” is not a semitic language. Khazaria was a pagan kingdom located in what is now Ukraine and southern Russia. In the 8th-century AD, Khazaria’s King Bhulon decided to convert his entire empire to Judaism and he brought Rabbis from Babylon and elsewhere to teach Talmudic/Kabbalistic Judaism to him and his subjects.
And the plot thickens (sickens), even as terms become more confusing! According to Christopher Storey (2006), most of Europe’s ‘Black Nobility’ are Khazarian Jews, not Hebrews or (Spanish) Sephardic Jews. The extremely powerful “Black Nobility” are also “crypto-Jews” in the sense that they remain secretly Jewish while professing other religions. Storey and many others maintain that Jewish groups, comprised of Ashkenazi, Sephardic, and other elements, control much if not most of the world’s wealth and run the world through financial control, corruption, and crime.
Most Christians seem to have forgotten that Jesus Christ repeatedly and vigorously criticized and condemned the Jewish Pharisaic power structure of his day. He called the Pharisaic Jews “vipers and hypocrites,” “children of the devil,” “children of hell,” and “those who say they are Jews and are not Jews, but are the Synagogue of Satan.” Jesus said: “Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! … You snakes! You brood of vipers! How will you escape being condemned to hell?” It would appear then, that Jesus was profoundly “anti-semitic” in the modern sense of the word.
So what should we call those “truth-tellers,” like Jesus, who dare to question and/or criticize this group that calls themselves Jews and which controls the world’s wealth, politics, and wars through corruption and crime? Should these “truth-tellers?” be referred to as “anti-Khazarian,” “anti-Black Nobility,” “anti-Jewish,” “anti-New World Order,” “anti-World Revolutionary Movement,” “anti-communist,” “anti-Nazi,” “anti-Synagogue of Satan,” “anti-Jewish/Freemasonic/Satanic/occult world criminal power structure?” Or should we continue to dismiss them as “anti-semitic?” I would suggest that of these terms, “anti-semitic” is the least accurate adjective that can be applied to someone who dares to criticize this demonic world power structure……
Referring back to the original use of the term “semite,” then a true “anti-semite,” would, by definition, be opposed to Middle Eastern Arabs, such as Palestinians. He might or might not be opposed to Khazar “Jews,” whose native language was/is Yiddish! Again, Douglas Reed (1956) declared that “Judaism is a political program disguised as religion.” Perhaps we should refer to “truth-tellers” who point this out as “anti-Judaic political program disguised as religion.”
Jewish writer, Dr. Henry Makow, used stronger language in a 2009 article:
Judaism is a secret Satanic cult posing as a religion…. Judaism is not Monotheistic but Luciferian. Its goal is the replacement of God with the secret Jewish leadership. Both the Talmud and the Cabala are dedicated to the proposition that only Jews are human…. Modern history and culture reflect a Cabalistic (Satanic) spell cast on the human race. It is dedicated to the fulfillment of prophecy, the eventual enslavement of mankind by the “Jews” who in practice will be the crazed Illuminati Order.
But then, this confusion of terms and concepts is quite useful for the power elite, isn’t it? As noted, along the way, the term became highly emotionally-loaded – through various kinds of societal propaganda such as the “Holocaust industry,” the press, Hollywood, and mind control. Thus, most people today would go to great lengths to avoid being labelled “anti-semitic.” The propaganda/mind control surrounding this phrase is so strong that calling someone “anti-semitic” is one way to assassinate someone’s character.
An indication of the degree of propaganda and mind control that surrounds these terms is that it is perfectly acceptable for people to use the words Christian, Buddhist, or Moslem. Someone who uses the word Christian is not automatically assumed to be “anti-Christian.” And it is considered OK to criticize Christians, Buddhists, and Moslems as well as the religions of Christianity, Buddhism, and Islam, etc.. BUT… if you use the word “Jew,” you may be condemned as “anti-semitic,” and consisered a bigot, racist, a fiend, a Holocaust-denier, etc.
To demonstrate how ludicrous this can get: Some months ago, someone stressed to me that it would definitely NOT be OK to use the word “Jew’s Harp” (which is the name for that goofy little metal instrument that you hold to your mouth, hit the metal in the middle with your finger. and it goes “dowing, dowing, dowing” in a drone sound). Strangely, I hadn’t mentioned anything about a Jew’s Harp, we weren’t talking about Jew’s Harps, and I certainly wasn’t thinking about Jew’s Harps at that time. In fact, I always thought it was a “Juice Harp!” Regardless, her serious tone let me know that a serious crime would be committed if someone were to mention that term.
In this regard, recall Voltaire’s statement: “If you want to find out who controls you, simply find out who you can’t criticize.”
But it gets even more convoluted than that! In “Anti-semitism, Qui Bono? (Who Benefits?): A Report on the Symbiosis between Anti-semitism and Zionism,” Dr. K. R. Bolton states:
Theodor Herzl (1860-1904), the founder of modern Zionism, recognized that anti-Semitism would further his cause, the creation of a separate state for Jews. To solve the Jewish Question, he maintained “we must, above all, make it an
international political issue.” Herzl wrote that Zionism offered the world a welcome “final solution of the Jewish question.” In his “Diaries”, page 19, Herzl stated:
“Anti-Semites will become our surest friends, anti-Semitic countries our allies.” Zionist reliance on Anti-Semitism to further their goals continues to this day. Studies of immigration records reflect increased immigration to the Zionist state during times of increased anti-Semitism. Without a continued inflow of Jewish immigrants to the state of “Israel”, it is estimated that within a decade the Jewish population of the Zionist state will become the minority.
Welcome to the world of continual lies, confusion, institutionalized fraud and theft, and perpetual wars brought to you by…. what should we call them? “Those nice people who have historically been so “victimized” by “anti-semitism.”
In “Hertzl was an anti-semite in disguise,” Dr. Affrat Ezzat observes:
… The word “Anti-Semitism:” – though historically and etymologically inaccurate terminology – still undoubtedly managed to describe how most of the peoples – especially in Christian Europe – felt towards Jews throughout history.
You can call it anti- Semitism, intolerance of Jews or the longest hatred ever in history, but we have to admit that there is something inherently irreconcilable- to the gentile way of life- in the genuine attributes of the Jews and their culture that peoples throughout different places and times disliked.
Even Theodor Herzl – the creator of political Zionism and the author of the book Der Judenstaat (the Jewish State) felt the same way toward Jews and Judaism. He often –according to his diary- showed contempt and dislike of his fellow Jews who abided by the Torah and Jewish traditions. … Yes, Herzl was an anti-Semite in disguise.
He tried his best, not to oppose and fight anti-Semitism- which he finally came to the conclusion that it was inescapable, but to break loose of his Jewishness…. Later on he tried to get rid of his Jewishness by inviting the Jews living in Vienna to convert en masse to Christianity which he considered a more purified religion and far superior to Judaism. Herzl’s anti-Semitic ideas were well articulated in an article he wrote in the “deutsche Zeitung”… in which he depicted Jews as villains and was quoted saying;
“The wealthy Jews control the world, in their hands lies the fate of governments and nations. They set governments one against the other. When the wealthy Jews play, the nations and the rulers dance. One way or the other, they get rich.”
…. That article showed that Herzl – who couldn’t get rid of his stigmatic Jewishness- was profoundly aware of the negative attributes of the Jewish character that could very well be the reason behind the enduring anti-Semitism. Herzl was indeed a visionary, not for advocating the establishment of a Jewish state but (because) he seemed one of the few who thought that if Anti-Semitism proved so hard to overcome or abolish, one might as well make use of it. Herzl’s ingenious idea was so simple and yet so dangerous. He came up with an idea (to) utilize anti-Semitism as a tool capable of changing the future of the Jews in Europe and which could alter the conspicuous and resistant anti-Semitism.
Herzl wrote in his diary;” an excellent idea enters my mind. To attract outright anti-Semites and to make them the destroyers of Jewish wealth.” Herzl believed that if a great power in Europe could be provoked against the Jews to a level that would critically jeopardize and even destroy a majority of Jews and their properties, then the tables could be turned, only then anti- Semitism would turn into a hideous crime (for which) the world has to pay for and repent, for the rest of time…. an idea that later came to be realized by Hitler and the Nazis. …Herzl was about to commit the original sin of defying the God of the Jews and leading the contemporary exodus from Europe.
…. With Herzl’s new Jewish state as Israel, the Jews thought they had said goodbye to anti-Semitism but that proved to be another Jewish myth. Anti-Semitism follows Jews wherever they go; it may be almost over in Europe but it is starting anew in the Middle East.
Does it ever occur to people that non-Jews (contemptuously referred to as “goyim” or “cattle” by Jews) may oppose “the Jews” on the basis of Jews’ behavior, exclusivism, chavinism, crimes, conspiracies, and historical failure to assimilate into the nations that host them? In this regard, I highly recommend Dr. E. Michael Jones’ 1200-page book, “The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and It’s Impact on World History” (2008), Dr. Kevin MacDonald’s “The Culture of Critique; An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Invovlement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements” (2002), Hugh Akin’s “Synagogue Rising: A Catholic Worldview of Anti-Christian Judaism and Counter-revolutionary Resistance” (2012), and Texe Marr’s “Conspiracy of the Six-Pointed Star” (2011). Jones (2008) notes that the confusion and barbarism of the Dark Ages resulted from the fact that this was a period of Jewish ascendancy in Europe. Given today’s technologies and weapons of mass destruction, responsible individuals cannot allow Jews to plunge the world into a new age of barbarism, a new Dark Ages.
Conclusion: As Reed (1956) notes, “Judaism is a political program, disguised as religion,” whose goal is to destroy all “gentile” nations, cultures and religions so that Jews can enslave and/or kill all non-Jews and establish their ‘Jewish Universal Empire.’ Because the minority of Jews infiltrate all nations, religions, and systems with the subversive intent to destroy those nations, religions, and systems, their criminal activities are, by definition, conspiracies. Thus, it seems to me that any non-Jew with a modicum of intelligence, backbone, and desire for self-preservation who is aware of these realities will oppose this group. Hence, they will be subject to being labeled an “anti-semitic conspiracy theorist” by the government/media/propaganda system.
Akin, H., 2012, Synagogue Rising: A Catholic Worldview of Anti-Christian Judaism and Counter-revolutionary Resistance, CatholicActionResourceCenter.com, Orlando, Florida, 729 pp.
Jones, E.M., 2008, the Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and It’s Impact on World History, Fidelity Press, South Bend, Indiana, 1200 pp.
MacDonald, K., 2002, The Culture of Critique; An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements, 1stbooks.com, 421 pp.
Marrs, T., 2011, Conspiracy of the Six-Pointed Star, RiverCrest Publishing, Austin, Texas, 426 pp.
Reed, D., 1956, The Controversy of Zion, Veritas Books, 587 pp.
Storey, C., 2006, The New UnderWorld Orfer; Triumph of Criminalism, Dark Actors Playing Games, The Global Fantasies of the Geomasonic Illuminati, Edward Harle Ltd., New York, London, 740 pp.