Webmaster Introduction: Herein, I include information of seven posts on this website regarding patents that pertain to the extra-legal, secret targeting of innocent civilians normally referred to as “organized stalking-electronic harassment” (OS-EH). Taken together, we can readily understand that “targeted individuals,” who have been nonconsensually tortured over the past 70+ years in classified black projects, have been the beta tests for the development of military, biomedical, and bioengineering weapons systems which culminate today in the Microsoft (Bill Gates’) Total Enslavement Patent 060606 (Cryptocurrency System Using Body Activity Data). In the 8th post (below), Professor Yuval Noah Harari, key advisor to Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum, explains the implications of the fact that humans are now “hackable animals.”
VII. (Bill Gates’ Total Enslavement Patent) 060606 – Cryptocurrency System Using Body Activity Data (& videos); Plus H.R. 666 (Anti-Racism in Public Health Act) & H.R. 6666 (COVID-19 Testing, Reaching, And Contacting Everyone (TRACE) Act)
I. Transcribed from Thomas (2007), “MONARCH: The New Phoenix Program”
The military financed all research into development of directed energy weapons. After decades of work, real progress was on the horizon, and much of the research became classified; or, once a breakthrough of some kind was made, the public program was shut down and restarted elsewhere in conditions of absolute secrecy. The published scientific papers that concerned potential weapons and even bioelectric medicine were reduced to a trickle, but occasional information about their existence continued to emerge. The works of Allen Sharp, Joseph Sharp, Allen Frey, Jose Delgado, Ross Adey, J.F. Schapitz, Andre Puharich, Herman Schwann, James Lin, Bill Van Bise, Eldon Byrd, Robert Becker, James Lilly, Igor Smirnov, and many others present sufficient evidence of these weapons’ existence. Many of these elite scientists had no idea who was funding their work and how the technology was being misused. Scientists who must knowlingly divulge classified information face twenty to life in prison. It must be stated that some of these men knew the danger of their work and others committed crimes against humanity without reservation.
The earliest work on the effects of electromagnetics on humans was done by Nikola Tesla.
Classification under the heading of National Security is sufficient to hide experimental work of scientists engaged in directed energy weapons research. However, if an inventor wishes to reap financial rewards for a device, a patent must be filed. There are hundreds of patents related to directed energy weapons and what the Pentagon now refers to as “psychotronica” or “synthetic telepathy.” The existence of these patents, together with the body of scientific research, and the testimony of victims of human experimentation is incontrovertible proof that the weapons exist. The earliest patents for directed energy weapons belong to Nikola Tesla. Tesla built the first electrical generating station, single handedly beginning the modern age. The SDI patent drawing submitted 70 years later by Dr. Bernard Eastland who holds numerous SDI patents are essentially Tesla drawings. It is hard to imagine a technical genius that far ahead of his time. J.P. Morgan was the primary investor in Tesla, but he eventually cut off his funding and confiscated the rights to many of the devices and papents, and Tesla died in poverty and obscurity.
1960’s USSR technology, #3773049, LIDA: An apparatus for the treatment of neuropsychic and somatic disorders wherein light-, sound-, VHF electromagnetic field-pulses and radiation from light-, sound-, VHF electromagnetic field- and heat-sources, respectively, are simultaneously applied by means of a control unit to the patient’s central nervous system with a predetermined repetition rate. The light radiation and sound radiation sources are made so as to exert an adequate and monotonous influence of the light- and sound-radiation on the patient’s visual analyzers and auditory analyzers, respectively.
1976: Patent #3951134 (1976); Robert G. Malech patented an “Apparatus and Method for Remotely Monitoring and Altering Brain Waves.” The patent abstract states: “Apparatus for method of sensing brain waves at a position remote from the subject, whereby electromagnetic signals of different frequencies are simultaneously transmitted to the subject. The present invention relates to apparatus and a method for monitoring brain waves wherein all components of the apparatus are remote from the test subject. High frequency transmitters are operated to radiate electromagnetic energy of different frequencies through antennas which are capable of scanning the entire brain of the test subject or any desired region thereof. The signals of different frequencies penetrate the skull of the subject and impinge upon the brain where they mix to form an interference wave modulated by radiation from the brain’s natural electrical activity. The modulated interference wave is transmitted by the brain and received by an antenna at a remote station where it is demodulated, and processed to provide a profile of the subject’s brain wave. In addition to passively monitoring his brain waves, the subject’s neurological processes may be affected by transmitting to his brain, through transmitting compensating signals. The latter signals can be derived from the received and processed brain waves.”
1989: #4858612, Stocklin: A method and apparatus for simulation of hearing in mammals by introduction of a plurality of microwaves into the region of the auditory cortex is shown and described. A microphone is used to transform sound signals into electrical signals which are in turn analyzed and processed to provide controls for generating a plurality of microwave signals at different frequencies. The multifrequency microwaves are then applied to the brain in the region of the auditory cortex. By this method sounds are perceived by the mammal which are representative of the original sound received by the microphone.
1998: #4877027 Brunkan: Hearing System: Sound is induced in the head of a person by radiating the head with microwaves in the range of 100 megahertz to 10,000 megahertz that are modulated with a particular waveform. The waveform consists of frequency modulated bursts. Each burst is made up of ten to twenty uniformly spaced pulses grouped tightly together. The burst width is between 500 nanoseconds and 100 microseconds. The pulse width is in the range of 10 nanoseconds to 1 microsecond. The bursts are frequency modulated by the audio input to create the sensation of hearing in the person whose head is irradiated.
#5123899, Gall: A system for altering the states of human consciousness involves the simultaneous application of multiple stimuli, preferable sounds, having differing frequencies and wave forms. The relationship between the frequencies of the several stimuli is exhibited by the equation….
1992: #5159703, Silent Subliminal Presentation System (aka Silent Sound and Clear Channel) Dr. Oliver Lowery: An inaudible form of communication that occurs just beyond human hearing range (nearing ultrasound), or just below it (nearing infrasound). It’s industry names include BrainStorm, BrainStream, and BrainSpeak. Silent communications system in which non-aural carriers, in the very low or very high audio frequency range or in the adjacent ultrasonic frequency spectrum, are amplitude or frequency modulated with the desired intelligence and propagated acoustically or vibrationally, for the inducement into the brain, typically through the use of loudspeakers, earphones, or piezoelectric transducers. The modulated carriers may be transmitted directly in real time or may be conveniently recorded and stored on mechanical, magnetic or optical media for delayed or repeated transmission to the listener.
Silent Sound can be sent acoustically or vibationally into the brain. The programming is received by the ear, undetected by the conscious mind, and immediately decoded by the subconscious to influence thoughts and emotions.
During the First Gulf War, a US Psyop unit installed a portable FM broadcast transmitter in the city of Al-Khafji. They transmitted a high-powered 100 MHz signal to overpowered the Iraqi station that was transmitting at that same frequency. The programming consisted of patriotic and religious music as well as intentionally contradictory military orders. The broadcast also consisted of inaudible negative Silent Sound programming which allegedly devastated the Iraqi soldiers, and according a March 23, 1991 British TV report: “the negative voice messages… were perceived by the subconscious minds of the Iraqi soldiers and the silent messages completely demoralized them and instilled a perpetual feeling of fear and hopelessness.”
1993: Robert A. Monroe: “Method for Inducing Mental, Emotional and Physical States of Consciousness, Including Specific Mental Activity in Human Beings,” by Robert A. Monroe, a practitioner of “remote viewing,” founder of the Monroe Institute in Charlottesville, Virginia. Specific states of consciousness can be induced, “through generation of stereo audio signals having specific wave shapes…. Human brain waves, in the form of EEGs, are superimposed upon specific stereo audio signals, known as carrier frequencies, which are within the range of human hearing.” Monroe filed a later patent as an improvement. He is reported to have had close connections to the CIA, and is now deceased.
#5356368 Monroe: Improved methods and apparatus for entraining human brain patterns, employing frequency following response (FFR) techniques, facilitate attainment of desired states of consciousness. In one embodiment, a plurality of electroencephalogram (EEG) waveforms, characteristic of a given state of consciousness, are combined to yield and EEG waveform to which subjects may be susceptible more readily. In another embodiment, sleep patterns are reproduced based on observed brain patterns during portions of a sleep cycle; entrainment principles are applied to induce sleep. In yet another embodiment, entrainment principles are applied in the work environment, to induce and maintain a desired level of consciousness. A portable devise also is described.
#6011991, Mardirossian: A system and method for the enabling of human beings to communicate by way of their monitored brain activity. The brain activity of an individual is monitored and transmitted to a remote location (e.g. by satellite). At the remote location, the monitored brain activity is compared with pre-recorded normalized brain activity curves, waveforms, or patters to determine if a match or substantial match is found. If such a match is found, then the computer at the remote location determines that the individual was attempting to communicate the word, phrase, or thought corresponding to the matched stored normalized signal.
#6017302, Loos: In human subjects, sensory resonances can be excited by subliminal atmospheric acoustic pulses that are tuned to the resonance frequency. The ½ Hz sensory resonance affects the autonomic nervous system and may cause relaxation, drowsiness, or sexual excitement, depending on the precise acoustic frequency near ½ Hz used. The effects of the 2.5 Hz resonance include slowing of certain cortical processes, sleepiness, and disorientation. For these effects to occur, the acoustic intensity must lie in a certain deeply subliminal range. Suitable apparatus consists of a portable battery-powered source of weak sub audio acoustic radiation. The method and apparatus can be used by the general public as an aid to relaxation, sleep, or sexual arousal, and clinically for the control and perhaps treatment of insomnia, tremors, epileptic seizures, and anxiety disorders. There is further application as a nonlethal weapon that can be used in law enforcement standoff situations, for causing drowsiness and disorientation in targeted subjects. It is then preferable to use venting acoustic monopolies in the form of a device that inhales and exhales air with sub audio frequency.
2003: #6587729: “Apparatus for Audibly Communicating Sppech Using the Radio Frequency Hearing Effect.”
Adey, Ross, Ph.D.: Dr. Ross Adey worked at UCLA, rigged the brains of lab animals to transmit to a radio receiver, which shot signals back to a device that sparked any behavior desired by the researcher. Adey had worked closely with émigré Nazi technicians after WWII. Adey determined that emotional states and behavior can be remotely influenced merely by placing a subject in an electromagnetic field. By directing a carrier frequency to stimulate the brain and using amplitude modulation to shape the wave to mimic a desired EEG frequency, he was able to impose a 4.5 CPS theta rhythm on his subjects. Drs. Joseph Sharp and Allen Frey experimented with microwaves, seeking to transmit spoken words directly into the audio cortex via a pulsed-microwave analog of the speaker’s sound vibration. Indded, Frey’s work in this field, dating back to 1960, gave rise to the so-called “Frey effect,” which is no more commonly referred to as “microwave hearing.” Within the Pentagon this ability is now known as “Artificial Telepathy.” Adey and others have compiled an entire library of frequencies and pulsation rates which can affect the mind and nervous system.
Beischer: Detrich, Dr.: Dr. Dietrich Beischer exposed 7,000 naval crew men to dangerous levels of microwave energy, claiming the exposure limits could be “obtained no other way,” given the “exquisitely complex and dynamic nature of the human organism.” Dr. Beischer disappeared or died in 1977, like scores of other scientists engaged in research on microwave weapons. Nobel laureate Robert O. Becker received a phone call from Beischer:
“He blurted out, I’m at a pay phone, I can’t talk long, they are watching me. I can’t go to the meeting or ever communicate with you again. I’m sorry, you’ve been a good friend. Goodbye.” Soon after I called his office at Pensacola and was told, “I’m sorry, there is no one here by that name.” Just as in the movies, a guy who had done important research there for decades just disappeared.”
According to author Ford Rowan, Richard Helm’s dream of biocommunication was achieved by the CIA in the late sixties. Microwaves penetrated the skull, the miniaturized receiver linked the brain to a remote computer. Brain waves were deciphered, recorded, and beamed to another person- a two-way mental communicatin.
Byrd, Eldon: Eldon Byrd, a specialist in medical bioengineering, worked for the Marine Corps from 1980 to 1983 at the Armed Forces Radiobilogy Research Institute of Bethesda, Maryland. Byrd experimented on small animals, and himself, to see if electromagnetic waves could be used to influence or entrain the brain activity of living organisms. Byrd said:
“We could put animals into a stupor by hitting them with frequencies. We got chick brains in vitro to dump 80% of the natural opiods in their brains. The effect was nonlethal and reversible. You could disable a person temporarily, it would have been like a stun gun, we would have had a weapon in one year.”
Byrd reported having his work taken away from him and the project going black. Numerous other researchers in electromagnetics report having their work taken from them at the precise point when they begin to get successful results.
Frey, Allen, Ph.D.: Dr. Allen Frey, a biophysicist at GE’s Advanced Electronics Center of Cornell University, and a contractor for the office of Naval Research, discovered in 1958 that the auditory system responds to EM energy in a portion of the RF (radio frequency) spectrum at low-power densities, well below that necessary for biological damage. According to Frey:
“The human auditory system and a table radio may be one order of magnitude apart in sensitivity to RF energy.”
He proposed “stimulating the nervous system without the damage caused by electrodes.” He wrote two papers, “Microwave Auditory Effect and Applications,” and “Human Auditory Response to Modulated Electromagnetic Energy.” Frey’s work had obvious implications for covert operations. He synchronized pulsed microwaves and the myocardial rhythm of a frog’s heart: the heart stopped beating. Frey had perfected the inducement of heart seizures by beamed electromagnetics. He microwaved cats and found that stimulation of the hypothalamus had a powerful effect on emotions. Frey found that human subjects exposed to 1310 MHz and 2982 NHz microwaves at average power densities of 0.4 to 2mW/cm2 perceived auditory sounds. The peak power densities were on the order of 200 to 3000 mW/cm2, and the pulse repetition frequencies varied from 200 to 400 Hz. Frey referred to this auditory phenomena as the RF sound. The sensation occurred instantly at average incident power densities well below that necessary for known biological damage, and appeared to originate from within or new the back of the head. Frey was reluctant to experiment on humans, but others, particularly Paperclip scientists, were not.
Lilly, John C.: In his autobiography, “The Scientist,” John C. Lilly records a conversation he had with the director of the National Institute of Mental Health- in 1953. The director asked Lilly to brief the CIA, FBI, NSA, and the various military intelligence services on his work using electrodes to stimulate directly the pleasure and pain centers in the brain. Lily refused, noting, in his reply:
“Dr. Antoine Remond, using our techniques in Paris, has demonstrated that this method of stimulation of the brain can be applied to the human without the help of the neurosurgeon; he is doing it in his office in Paris without neurosurgical supervision. This means that anybody with the proper apparatus can carry this out on any person covertly, with no external signs that the electrodes have been used on that person. I feel that if this technique got into the hands of a secret agency, they would have total control over a human being and be able to change his beliefs extremely quickly, leaving little evidence of what they had done.”
Lin, James, Ph.D.: Dr. James Lin of Wayne State University wrote a book entitled “Microwave Auditory Effects and Applications,” in which he states:
“The capability of communicating directly with humans by pulsed microwaves is obviously not limited to the field of therapeutic medicine.”
Persinger, Michael, Ph.D.: Dr. Michael Persinger, a psychologist and neuroscientist, “did research on the effects of electromagnetic radiation on the brain for a Pentagon weapons project.” He has worked in the field for 40 years, and has been funded by the Navy and reportedly the NSA as well. Persinger perfected a means to make experimental subjects feel they have been abducted by aliens or had an encounter with angels or God, through the use of a modified motorcycle helmet equipped with solenoids to send electromagnetic pulses through the frontal lobes of their brains.
“Human experience of God can be generated by a process that has nothing to do with whether God exists or not.”
Persinger published, “On the Possibility of Directly Accessing Every Human Brain by Electromagnetic Induction of Fundamental Algorithms” (1995):
“A process which is coupled to the narrow band of brain temperature could allow all normal human beings to be affected by a sub-harmonic whose frequency range at 10 Hz would only vary by 0.1 Hz…. Random variations , of noise within the matrices could potentially differentiate between individual brains.”
In other words, individuals could be identified by the specific characteristics of their brain output.
“Identification of these sequences could also allow direct access to the most complex neurocognitive processes associated with the self, human consciousness, and the aggregate of experimental representations (episodic memory) that define the individual within the brain.”
In short, a person’s memory, consciousness, and sense of self can be fully accessed and modified by electromagnetic means. Essentially, a person’s personality can be completely shaped by electromagnetic means much like the research of Dr. Ewen Cameron sought to do with more primitive means. Persinger says brain processes can be “circumvented by direct induction of this information within the brain…. The basic premise is that synthetic duplication of the neuroelectrical correlates generated by sensors to an actual stimulus should produce identical experiences without the presence of that stimulus.”
According to Persinger, virtually any mental state can be artificially injected into a human brain from an exterior source. The most frightening thing is that the means for doing this already exist in a fully operation al form on a worldwide basis.
“The power levels for these amplitudes are similar to those associated with the signals (generated globally by radio and communication systems)… Within the last two decades a potential has emerged which was improbable but which is now marginally feasible. This potential is the technical capability to influence directly the major portion of the approximately six billion brains of the human species… by generating neural information within a physical medium within which all members of the species are immersed.”
Persinger’s message, minus the jargon, is that the entire human race can be controlled through the use of television and radio networks.
Pribram, Karl, Ph.D.: EM (electromagnetic) control machines were championed at Stanford University by Dr. Karl Pribram, director of Neuropsychology Research Laboratory:
“I certain could educate a child by putting an electrode in the lateral hypothalamus and then selecting the situations at which I stimulate it. In this way I can grossly change his behavior.”
“Psychology Today” celebrated Pribram as “The Magellan of Brain Science.” Having obtained his BS and MD degrees at the University of Chicago and Stanford University, respectively, he studied how the brain processes and stores sensory imagery, and is credited with discovering that mental imaging bears a close resemblance to hologram projection. (“The basis for transmitting images to the craniums of test subjects under the misnomer “remote viewing?”)
Pucharich, Andre, and McCoulloch, Warren S.: Puharich studied the effects of radio waves on animals at Northwestern University in the late 1940s, and later founded a laboratory he called the Round Table Foundation of Electrobiology. His associate was Warren S. McCulloch, of Bellvue, an early advocate of brain implants, and chair of conferences, sponsored by the Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation. Puharich was later employed at the Army’s Chemical and Biological Warfare Center at Fort Detrich, Maryland, researching the effects of LSD for the CIA in 1954. He perfected the radio tooth implant, “ a small little relay and receiver and transmitter.” Puharich also worked at the Permanente Research Foundation, and was funded by Sandoz Chemical Works.
Schapitz, J.F., Dr.: Dr. J.F. Schapitz was funded by the DOD in 1974 for a proposal to research the use of radio broadcasting in conjunction with hypnotic control. He wrote:
“The spoken word of the hypnotist may be conveyed by modulated electromagnetic energy directly into the subconscious parts of the human brain, i.e., without employing any technical devices for receiving and transcoding the messages and without the person exposed to such influence having a chance to control the input consciously.”
His second experiment was the implanting of hypnotic suggestions for simple acts, like leaving the lab to buy some particular item, which were to be triggered by a suggested time, spoken word, or sight. Subjects were to be interviewed later. “It may be expected that they rationalize their behavior and consider it to be undertaken out of their own free will,” he wrote. The results of Schapitz’s experimentation have never been released to the public.
Schwann, Herman, Ph.D.: Dr. Hermann Schwann is hailed as the father of bioelectric medicine. Out of his research came the 10-milliwatt safety standard set in the 1950s. Schwann workeda t the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for biophysics in Germany, became a paperclip scientist after the war, and taught bioengineering at the University of Pennsylvania. Schwann was heavily funded, mostly by the DOD. Schwann was lionized at the University of Pennsylvania as a great humanitarian, his portrait still hangs in a place of honor. Schwann was a German scientist who came to the US under a military recruitment program after the war. He has worked at the University of Pennsylvania on numerous government contracts, and set the first health and safety standards for electromagnetic radiation, adopted bythe US government. In “Physical properties of biological matter: Some History, Principles, and Applications” (1982), Schwann writes, “Rajewsky and I had a published a paper on the conductivity of erthrocytes, reporting, for the first time, dielecftric measurements on biological materials extending up to 1,000 MHz… I mention all these things to indicate the decisive role that the Navy and NIH played. Navy support has been available to me, in one form another, ever since 1947, and NIH support since 1952.”
Sharp, Joseph C., Ph.D.: At the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Dr. Joseph C. Sharp was himself the subject of an experiment in which pulsed microwave audiograms, or the microwave analog of the sound vibration of spoken words, were delivered to his brain in such a way that he was able to understand the words that were spoken. Military and undercover uses of such a device might include driving a subject crazy with inner voices in order to discredit him, or conveying undetectable instructions to a programmed assassin.
1934: Chaffee and Light, 1934, A method for remote control of electrical stimulation of the nervous system,
1934: Vasilev, 1934, Critical evaluation of the hypnogenic method,
Frey, A., Microwave auditory effect and applications,”
Frey, A., “Human Auditory response to modulated electromagnetic energy.”
1980, Vallely, General Paul E., and Aquino, Lt. Col. Michael, “From Psyop to MindWar: The Psychology of Victory”
II. From Directed Energy Weapons[ Remote Control Humans ]
[Patent #] 6017302, Loos:
In human subjects, sensory resonances can be excited by subliminal atmospheric acoustic pulses that are tuned to the resonance frequency. The 1/2 Hz sensory resonance affects the autonomic nervous system and may cause relaxation, drowsiness, or sexual excitement, depending on the precise acoustic frequency near 1/2 Hz used. The effects of the 2.5 Hz resonance include slowing of certain cortical processes, sleepiness, and disorientation. For these effects to occur, the acoustic intensity must lie in a certain deeply subliminal range. Suitable apparatus consists of a portable battery-powered source of weak sub audio acoustic radiation. The method and apparatus can be used by the general public as an aid to relaxation, sleep, or sexual arousal, and clinically for the control and perhaps treatment of insomnia, tremors, epileptic seizures, and anxiety disorders. There is further application as a nonlethal weapon that can be used in law enforcement standoff situations, for causing drowsiness and disorientation in targeted subjects. It is then preferable to use venting acoustic monopoles in the form of a device that inhales and exhales air with sub audio frequency. (1)[ Leading Government Official Acknowledges DEWs ]
“Microwave mind control: Modern torture and control mechanisms eliminating human rights and privacy”
Dr. Rauni Leena Kilde, Former Chief Medical Officer of Finland
Report-September 25, 1999
“All our emotions, moods, and thoughts have a specific brain frequency which has been catalogued. If these records fall into the wrong hands, our behaviour and attitudes can be manipulated by persons whose ethics and morals are not in our best interest. Both military and intelligence agencies have been infiltrated with such persons.” (4)[ Project Pandora ]
In 1965 it was discovered that the US embassy in Moscow was being hit with electromagnetic radiation in the microwave spectrum, but the fact was kept secret from the embassy employees…. The DOD‘s Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) set up a lab at Walter Reed Army Institute of Research and participated in Project Pandora. Scientists began by zapping monkeys to study the biological effects of highly concentrated microwave frequencies. (Constantine pg9) Similar studies were conducted at the V.A. hospital in Kansas City, Univ. of Rochester, Brooks Air Force Base in Texas, Johns Hopkins, MIT, the Mitre corp., Univ. of Pennsylvania, and many other domestic and foreign research labs. The CIA began experimenting with other forms of directed energy in the EM spectrum. Dr. Jose Delgado experimented on four human subjects using radio waves, reporting they experienced different emotions, sensations, and colored visions. Delgado stated that these weapons were more dangerous than atomic destruction. With knowledge of the brain, he said, We may transform, we may shape, direct, robotize man. (1)[ Microwaving Animal Experiments ]
“Dr. Allan Frey, a biophysicist at G.E.‘s Advanced Electronics Center, Cornell Univ. (and a contractor for the office of Naval Research) discovered in 1958 that the auditory system responds to EM energy in a portion of the RF spectrum at low power densities…well below that necessary for biological damage.” “The human auditory system and a table radio may be one order of magnitude apart in sensitivity to RF energy. Frey proposed stimulating the nervous system without the damage caused by electrodes. He wrote two papers, Microwave Auditory Effect and Applications and Human Auditory Response to Modulated Electromagnetic Energy. Frey‘s work had obvious implications for covert operations. He synchronized pulsed microwaves with the myocardial rhythm of a frog‘s heart, the heart stopped beating. Frey had perfected the induction of heart seizures by beamed electromagnetics. He microwaved cats and found that stimulation of the hypothalamus had a powerful effect on emotions. Frey…found that human subjects exposed to 1310MHz and 2982 MHz microwaves at average power densities of 0.4 to 2mW/cm2 perceived auditory sounds…” (1)[ MKULTRA ]
The CIA, in association with various other agencies, undertook a long series of experiments on unsuspecting prisoners, students, military personnel and others recruited into one of the at least 162 subprojects of what became known as MKULTRA.(56) …Experimenters used college students, servicemen, mental patients, the poor and, in several instances, children as young as four years old, in attempts to create untraceable assassins, couriers and other operatives. MKULTRA sub-projects involved the services of many notable universities and used a number of false front corporations… 64 We would still know nothing of these activities had it not been for the release of 16,000 pages of documents in 1977 through the FOIA request filed by the surviving family of Frank Olson. Unfortunately CIA Director Richard Helms ordered the destruction of any MKULTRA records shortly before the order came in to his office 65, leaving an incomplete picture of a concerted effort by various agencies to create new and better means of controlling the thoughts, emotions and thus behavior, of unsuspecting individuals. (6)[ Official – Test Weapons on Americans ]
CNN.com: “Air Force chief: Test weapons on testy U.S. mobs”
Air Force Secretary Michael Wynne stated in 2007 that “nonlethal weapons should be tested on U.S. civilians before being used on the battlefield,” referring to the use of EM weapons in crowd-control situations. “The object is basically public relations,” said Wynne. “Domestic use would make it easier to avoid questions from others about possible safety considerations.” 16 (3)[ More Remote Control Humans ]
Robert A. Monroe (1993) “Method for Inducing Mental, Emotional and Physical States of Consciousness, Including Specific Mental Activity in Human Beings”, patented by Robert A. Monroe, a practitioner of “remote viewing”, founder of the Monroe Institute in Charlottesville, Virginia. Specific states of consciousness can be induced, “through generation of stereo audio signals having specific wave shapes…human brain waves, in the form of EEGs, are superimposed upon specific stereo audio signals, known as carrier frequencies which are within the range of human hearing.” (1)[ DEWs ]
A detailed study conducted by Andrei G. Pakhomov, Yahya Akyel, Olga N. Pakhomova, Bruce E. Stuck, and Michael R. Murphy with the Brooks Air Force Base, Human Effectiveness Directorate, offers a scientific analysis of the effects of millimeter waves, “Current State and Implications of Research on Biological Effects of Millimeter Waves: A Literature Review”, McKesson BioServices (A.G.P., Y.A., O.N.P.), U. S. Army Medical Research Detachment of the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (B.E.S.), and Directed Energy Bioeffects Division, Human Effectiveness Directorate, Air Force Research Laboratory (M.R.M.), Brooks Air Force Base, San Antonio, TX. (6)[ Weapons are for Enemies, no, Citizens ]
Why hasn’t the weapon been more widely used for war? It doesn’t have the success rate needed to be reliably used for war in place of ground troops. It probably is being used as a supplement. According to European Parliament documents it was used in Desert Storm to fatigue and demoralize troops. Also, if it were successfully used in war once, countries would invest more into anti-psychotronic defenses. So it is considered more valuable as a political dissident silencing, spying, espionage, and silent assassination tool. (5)[ The Subliminal is Real ]
Nexus Magazine, Volume 5, Issue 6, October/November 1998
Military Use of Mind Control Weapons, Judy Wall 1998
PSY-OPS WEAPONRY USED IN THE PERSIAN GULF WAR
“…Subliminally, a much more powerful technology was at work: a sophisticated electronic system to ‘speak’ directly to the mind of the listener… and artificially implant negative emotional states-feelings of fear, anxiety, despair and hopelessness. This subliminal system doesn’t just tell a person to feel an emotion, it makes them feel it; it implants that emotion in their minds. …presentation system carries cloned emotional signatures, the result is overwhelming.” (4)[ DEWs ]
The US has deployed the Project Sheriff active denial weapon in Iraq. Raytheon outfitted Humvees with their Silent Guardian Protection System, a device capable of heating the skin to 1/64 of an inch, causing instant pain similar to intense sunburn, 103 with the goal to facilitate dispersing a crowd. According to a report released by the Air Force on the human effects of this weapon, people with contact lenses and those wearing metal suffered greater effects. An imprint of a coin was discovered on the skin of a test subject and death or severe heart problems may occur.104 (6)[ Crowd Control ]
Active Denial System: (ADS)
Wade Smith, deputy director of this program for Raytheon, has voluntarily felt the beam during testing. “This is an effect that literally gets under your skin,” said Smith, “I can assure you, once you come in contact with the beam, you will be inclined to stop whatever you are doing.” Active Denial Technology uses a transmitter to send a tight beam of 95-Ghz millimeter waves; the energy reaches the subject and penetrates less than 1/64th of an inch into the skin. A two-second burst can heat the skin to a temperature of 130 degrees Fahrenheit. The sensation is like that experienced when touching an ordinary light bulb; the flesh does not burn, however, because of the low levels of energy used. Exposure of at least 250 seconds would be required before burns would result. Sandia National Labs website has the following information: ADS systems are a new class of non-lethal weaponry using 95 GHz-millimeter-wave directed energy. This technology is capable of rapidly heating a person‘s skin to achieve a pain threshold that has been demonstrated by AFRL human subject testing to be very effective at repelling people, without burning the skin or causing other secondary effects. Active Denial Technology (ADT) provides an effective non-lethal active-response mechanism to disperse, disturb, distract, and establish the intent of intruders. ADT emits a 95 GHz non-ionizing electromagnetic beam of energy that penetrates approximately 1/64 of an inch into human skin tissue, where nerve receptors are concentrated. Within seconds, the beam will heat the exposed skin tissue to a level where intolerable pain is experienced and natural defense mechanisms take over. This intense heating sensation stops only if the individual moves out of the beam‘s path or the beam is turned off. The sensation caused by the system has been described by test subjects as feeling like touching a hot frying pan or the intense radiant heat from a fire. Burn injury is prevented by limiting the beam‘s intensity and duration. DOD-sponsored millimeter-wave human effectiveness testing, initiated in 2001, has demonstrated ADT as both effective and safe without any long-term effects. It is expected that the DOD-funded human effectiveness testing of the small-beam ADS by the AFRL HEDR during the next six to eight months will validate its effectiveness and safety as a non-lethal weapon system. (company website) The ADS is the public face of a brand of technologies that have never seen the light of day but have been in existence for decades. This weapon is lethal depending on the distance to the target (person) and the power level setting. Second and third degree burns are possible at shorter ranges, higher power settings, or longer time periods of exposure. Besides using the most benign terms for these new weapons, the public face of the new technology is restricted to those systems that will cause less resistance among the general public to their development. (1)[ DEWs ]
Definition from the Center for Army Lessons Learned, Fort Leavenworth, KS: “Nonlethal weapon which includes (1) a neuro-electromagnetic device which uses microwave transmission of sound into the skull of persons or animals by way of pulse-modulated microwave radiation; and (2) a silent sound device which can transmit sound into the skull of person or animals. NOTE: The sound modulation may be voice or audio subliminal messages. One application of V2K is use as an electronic scarecrow to frighten birds in the vicinity of airports.” (6)
http://call.army.mil/products/thesaur/00016275.htm[ LRAD ]
According to Defense Update, the LRAD [Long Range Acoustical Device] can produce a 150-decibel acoustic beam from 300 meters away. The human threshold for pain is between 120 to 140 decibels.112 In a 2003 New York Times article Mr. Norris demonstrates his technology to the reporter. At 1% of capacity, the reporter’s eyes hurt, and hours later still experienced a headache.113 …This technology can inflict permanent damage and death despite its classification as a non-lethal weapon. While the LRAD may be seen as a way to save lives in times of disaster or to avoid civilian casualties, the LRAD and similar directed acoustics may be cause for concern to those who exercise their right to assemble and conduct peaceful demonstrations and protests. The New York City police used the LRAD at the Republican National Convention and it was also used in Miami at a WTO Free Trade protests.114 (6)[ More Remote Controlling Humans ]
The American Psychologist
Journal of the American Psychological Association, Volume 30, March 1975, Number 3
“Given a thermodynamic interpretation, it would follow that information can be encoded in the energy and “communicated” to the “listener. Communication has in fact been demonstrated. …Sharp and Grove (note 2) found that appropriate modulation of microwave energy can result in “wireless” and “receiverless” communication of SPEECH. …The capability of communicating directly with a human being by “receiverless radio” has obvious potentialities both within and without the clinic.” (4)[ NSA’s Eschelon ]
Signals Intelligence refers to the ability to eaves drop on cell phones, land lines, radios, and email. Eschelon was the name of the program that was exposed in Australia when it was charged with being used for political purposes. Eschelon‘s surveillance power lies in its ability “to tap all international and some domestic communications circuits, and sift out messages which sound interesting. Computers automatically analyze every telex message or data signal, and can also identify calls to, say, a target telephone number in London, no matter from which country they originate.” According to the BBC, “Every international telephone call, fax, e-mail, or radio transmission can be listened to by powerful computers capable of voice recognition. They home in on a long list of key words, or patterns of messages. They are looking for evidence of international crime, like Terrorism.” Building on an original post WWII alliance between the US, Britain, Australia, New Zealand, and Canada, Eschelon had by the late 1980‘s expanded to include joint operations with Germany, Japan, and China. It was initiated under the legal premise that while it is not permissible for the US government to monitor the conversations of its citizens without a warrant, it is not illegal for British intelligence to monitor American citizens, etc. Once the “take” has been pooled, the respective agencies can have safe access to their own domestic intelligence, because the Britons, Australians, or Germans did it, and not the home government. The primary operating agency for all Eschelon activities worldwide is the US National Security Agency [NSA]. (Rupert pg 228) When Boeing beat European Airbus in a major sale worth billions of dollars the Europeans accused the US government of conducting industrial espionage on behalf of Boeing using Eschelon or related technologies. (1)[ Total Information Awareness (TIA) ]
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) will be given access to all state and local databases, complete access to all banking and stock transactions, and all private data bases on demand (medical records). They will monitor and control all communications at state and local levels, as well as build an intranet for corporations. Local police agencies that receive federal subsidies (all of them), will in effect become intelligence gathering units for the federal government.
Under the TIA program created by DARPA the government is now monitoring almost all activity of all Americans, including bank deposits, shopping, web surfing, academic grades, divorce records, spending, phone calls, utility usage, travel, virtually everything. It plans to track everything you do employing face recognition software that can stop you from making a withdrawal at the bank or from boarding a plane. The government has placed all its faith in incredible new technologies such as PROMIS software and exotic weaponry systems that are just beginning to be unveiled. TIA plans to recognize you by your voice, by your unique body odor, it even plans to use “non-invasive neuroelectric sensors” to read your mind. (Washington Times 8/17/02 (1)
Information warfare works as an internet strategy according to war college documents by having people chase the white rabbit around the endless maze of disinformation so that they can’t even tell what is true anymore. The only people who research these topics are the thousands of victims. (5)[ Former NSA Employee Sues NSA ]
John St Clair Akwei vs. National Security Agency Ft George G. Meade, MD, USA (Civil Action 92-0449)
NSA Signals Intelligence uses EMF Brain Stimulation for Remote Neural Monitoring (RNM) and Electronic Brain Link (EBL).[ Man on the Moon ]
Senator & former Astronaut, John Glenn sought to pass legislation in Congress that would make the use of human guinea pigs less likely.[ Weed & Seed ]
The Weed and Seed program is touted as a method to prevent violent crime and drug trafficking in select neighborhoods using multiple government agencies, Federal, State, and local authorities to mobilize residents in a targeted are to assist law enforcement in identifying and removing violent offenders and drug traffickers from their neighborhoods. All these actions lead to rejuvenating “seeding” operations to bring back desirable elements to replace the people who have been weeded out. Just how the many agencies in tandem with locals weed out the bad elements is not spelled out. The program is sponsored by the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) which on their website proudly proclaim that non-lethal weapons are being distributed at the local level to fight crime. Just what kind of non-lethal weapons are being used and on whom, is not exactly clear. One such system openly displayed by the NIJ for dissemination to local authorities is the active denial system and the milliwave radar system for burning human beings and seeing into private residences respectively. (1)[ Russian & American Partnership for DEW’s ]
The 3\1\93 issue of Time Magazine and the Jan. 11-17, 1993 issue of DEFENSE NEWS both reported on U.S. and Russian collaborations involving directed energy and mind-control technologies which could be used for various purposes such as to suppress riots or control dissidents. (2)
The 8\22\94 NEWSWEEK MAGAZINE reported on a secret meeting between experts from the FBI’s Counter-Terrorism Center and Dr. Smirnov, whose work has included remote electroencephalography and neural mapping of the human brain. (2)[ Militarizing the Police ]
The 3\23\94 WASHINGTON POST reported: “The Pentagon and the Justice Department have agreed to share military technology, including directed energy weapons, with civilian law enforcement agencies for use on America’s urban battlefields. (2)[ … and yet … More Remote Controlling Humans ]
In the 1970‘s in the law review Crime and Justice, an article entitled “The Use of Electronics in the Observation and Control of Human Behavior and its Possible Use in Rehabilitation and Control” stated “In the very near future, a computer technology will make possible alternatives to imprisonment. The development of systems for telemetering information from sensors implanted in or on the body will soon make possible the observation and control of human behavior without actual physical contact…it will be possible to maintain 24 hour surveillance over the subject and to intervene electronically or physically to influence and control selected behavior. It will thus be possible to exercise control over human behavior and from a distance without contact”. (Kieth pg 102) (1)[ A President for the People ]
When Jimmy Carter became President in 1976 he promptly moved to introduce a modicum of control, he instituted the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act establishing an 11 member secret court to oversee the surveillance activities of our covert agencies….Carter’s move to reform the CIA was to appoint an outsider as head of the agency, Admiral Stansfield Turner. After Turner took over as Director of the CIA 800 “rogue” agents were let go, though most all of them found work in various false front companies that had been set up in the previous years. 84 (6)
…tighter restrictions on human experiment including accountability and transparency did not occur until 1997, when President Clinton instituted revised protocols on human experiments.87 (6)
The Russians banned all EMF weapons in 2001. (6)[ The Police-State Rising ]
In March, 1993, the National Institute of Justice (NIJ, Dept. of Justice), issued a report titled: “NIJ Initiative On Less-Than-Lethal Weapons,” which details the push to arm state and local law enforcement offices with directed-energy weapons for use in domestic affairs. (2)[ Targeting Individuals ]
“In 2004, The US Air Force Directorate: Controlled Effects gives a clear picture of objectives:…“For the Controlled Personnel Effects capability, the S&T panel explored the potential for targeting individuals with non lethal force, from a militarily useful range, to make selected adversaries think or act according to our needs. Through the application of non-lethal force, it is possible to physically influence or incapacitate personnel.” From the Air Force Research Lab: http://www.afrlhorizons.com/Briefs/Jun04/DE0401.html (6)[ Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, Part Two ]
Congressman Dennis Kucinich, introduced his “Space Preservation Act of 2001,” originally introduced in the House as HR 2977 which listed “electronic, psychotronic, or information weapons” and “plasma, electromagnetic, sonic, or ultrasonic weapons” that would be prohibited or controlled by the legislation. (3)[ Augmented Cognition ]
One application of augmented cognition allows a user to monitor a person’s brain functions and send anticipatory commands to the person being monitored. For instance, a military command unit will be able to monitor a pilot in a cockpit, and based on the sensory output of the soldier, the base command can input messages directly into the pilot’s brain to improve performance. DARPA describes this as a human computer symbiosis whereby, “This research will enable development of closed loop human-computer technologies, where the state of the user is measured, analyzed, and automatically adapted to by the computational system.”118 …DARPA does not address the implications of such symbiosis, or the dilemma of the extent to which a person can or should be manipulated. The use of this technology is used for military purposes but it may not be long until it is used to “improve” the factory worker, prisoners, or the mentally ill. (6)[ Proof of DEW Existence ]
U.S. News & World Report; 7/7/1997; Douglas Pasternak
So-called acoustic or sonic weapons […] can vibrate the insides of humans to stun them, nauseate them, or even “liquefy their bowels and reduce them to quivering [diarrheic] messes,” according to a Pentagon briefing. (4)[ Iraq – Testing Ground for DEW’s ]
U.S. TAPS HIGH-TECH ARSENAL/PENTAGON LIKELY TO DEBUT NEW WEAPONS IN IRAQ. (News)
The Cincinnati Post (Cincinnati, OH); 3/20/2003 Byline: Jim Krane Associated Press
“Once you’re engaged and you have a capability that’s almost ready, you’ll try it,” said Clark Murdock, a former Air Force strategic planner now with the Center for Strategic and International Studies. “All kinds of things have been invented, particularly in the (classified) world, that will be used. If you use it and it works and no one knows, why talk about it?” (4)[ The New Cointelpro 2.0 ]
Philosophy of “Occam’s Razor” which states that the simplest explanation is usually the best. So to make someone sound paranoid, all you have to do is come up with a sufficiently complex plan of harassment and the majority of people’s disbelief of that event will be sufficient not to act or care about it. (5)[ Disinformation & Misdirection Techniques of Agents ]
Simply by getting a couple of agents to pretend they are psychotronic slaves and then have them talk about evil aliens or other typically non-believable topics, the whole group of people who now talk about electromagnetic brain manipulation is associated with evil aliens and not believed by the average person who heard the first story. (5)[ HAARP ]
High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project (HAARP) is the world‘s largest electromagnetic broadcasting station…a creation of US Air Force and Naval Research…30 miles from Fairbanks Alaska,….The HAARP project manager describes the “experiment” of earth penetrating capability using “frequencies of 10 to 20 Hertz (pulses per second) or maybe one Hertz, one cycle per second type waves.” This range of frequencies are the same dominant frequencies within which the human brain normally operates. Objections to nondisclosure of the biological effects of ELF on living things were ignored. The military, particularly the Navy and Air Force, have extensive research on the negative effects of ELF. These effects have been well documented but the government easily deflects public concern by playing down the effects and minimizing the risks. This is the same method used for other military systems, including nuclear weapons tests, LSD experiments, and radiation experiments, all carried out on unknowing subjects under the guise of National Security. The Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) has been falsified as to the true nature of the weapon system, its capabilities, and its possible fallout….HAARP can do seven things or more…Generate an EMP to disable electronic devices, improve submarine communications, more flexible and accurate radar, disrupt enemy communications while maintaining ours, earth penetrating radar for finding hidden installations, finding oil, gas and mineral deposits, detection of low flying missiles and planes. These are just the publicly stated capabilities….
The brain operates with a narrow band of frequencies, beta waves or normal activity are 13-35 Hz, alpha waves or focused mental functioning are 8-12 Hz, theta waves or mental imagery are 4-7 Hz, and delta waves or sleep are .5-3 Hz. External stimulation of the brain by electromagnetic energy causes the brain to become entrained or locked in phase with an external signal. Specific waveforms and frequencies trigger precise chemical responses in the brain. The release of these neurochemicals cause specific reactions in the brain, which result in feelings of fear, lust, depression, love, etc. The power level needed to achieve a level of control over brain activity is very small, from 5 to 200 microamperes, which is a thousand times less than the power to run a 60watt light bulb. The trick to influencing brain activity is in the combination of frequency, power level and wave form. (1)[ …More Remote Controlling Humans ]
[Patent #] 6011991, Mardirossian:
A system and method for enabling human beings to communicate by way of their monitored brain activity. The brain activity of an individual is monitored and transmitted to a remote location (e.g. by satellite). At the remote location, the monitored brain activity is compared with pre-recorded normalized brain activity curves, waveforms, or patterns to determine if a match or substantial match is found. If such a match is found, then the computer at the remote location determines that the individual was attempting to communicate the word, phrase, or thought corresponding to the matched stored normalized signal. (1)[ Bathing in Microwaves ]
We are bathed in microwave energy, how come there is so little independent investigation in this area especially in light that the head acts as a microwave cavity and neurons as microwave transceivers? There are Earth shattering patents from the 70’s and 80’s on brain wave amplification, brain wave reading at a distance, and brain wave modulation using a wide range of frequencies. How is this being ignored? Pretty obvious what is going on, isn’t it? (5)[ DEWs ]
Pulsed Energy Projectiles (PEPs) are another form of weaponry that is used to paralyze a victim with pain. According to New Scientist magazine, the expanding plasma effects nerve cells, but the long term effects remain a public mystery.105 The Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Program reports that, PEPs create a flash bang effect that startles and distracts.106 However, the effects are much greater than just startling an individual. A 2001 Time magazine article states that the PEP “superheats the surface moisture around a target so rapidly that it literally explodes, producing a bright flash of light and a loud bang. The effect is like a stun grenade, but unlike a grenade the pep travels at nearly the speed of light and can take out a target with pinpoint accuracy…as far away as 2 km.”107 (6)[ Remote Controlling Humans ]
Robert G. Malech patented in 1976 an, “Apparatus and Method for Remotely Monitoring and Altering Brain Waves” (#3951134). The patents abstract states, “Apparatus for method of sensing brain waves at a position remote from the subject whereby electromagnetic signals of different frequencies are simultaneously transmitted to the brain of the subject”. “The present invention relates to apparatus and a method for monitoring brain waves wherein all components of the apparatus are remote from the test subject. “High frequency transmitters are operated to radiate electromagnetic energy of different frequencies through antennas which are capable of scanning the entire brain of the test subject or any desired region thereof. The signals of different frequencies penetrate the skull of the subject and impinge upon the brain where they mix to form an interference wave modulated by radiation from the brain‘s natural electrical activity. The Modulated interference wave is transmitted by the brain and received by an antenna at a remote station where it is demodulated, and processed to provide a profile of the subject‘s brain waves. In addition to passively monitoring his brain waves, the subject‘s neurological processes may be affected by transmitting to his brain, through transmitting compensating signals. The latter signals can be derived from the received and processed brain waves.” (Kieth pg 182) (1)[ Dumbing-Down the Populace ]
It is difficult enough for people to learn and understand. We spend a third of our lives in school. It is difficult to comprehend the thinking it took the militants to decide to declare an informational war on the very country and people that they were sworn to protect and uphold the words of the founding documents and ideals of this nation. All foreign governments clearly have deciphered these technologies as much as I and others have, so the only conclusion that you can draw is that the CIA/Military are not afraid these secrets will fall into the wrong hands abroad but that they do not trust the citizens with these secrets and have even declared psychological and informational war on us. (5)[ Winning Hearts & Minds ]
Just in case you are still wondering why we have terrorism at all or why we are called the “great SATAN” by many countries, just be reminded of articles published in major newspapers such as the Feb. 14, 1992 USA Today, who reported allegations by Saddam Hussein that the CIA targeted him: “the CIA used psychotronics and biocommunication to cause a blood clot in the brain or heart…”. We even have laws that say we can not assassinate leaders of other countries. We have turned into a criminal state in which Congress is impotent to enforce the laws without an army of their own. SATAN (silent assassination through amplified neurons) has many applications for pissing people off and creating life long enemies. Even the European Parliament documented this fact about the psychological effects of psychotronics after Desert Storm. Almost every country in the world is aware of the U.S.’s use of psychotronic weapons around the world except U.S. citizens. Sadly, our government has decided to make us the most uneducated and politically ignorant nation of the so called first world countries through an embarrassing public education system and perpetual lying to us “due to national security”. (5)
Air Force’s “New World Vistas” report: “It would also appear possible to create high fidelity speech in the human body, raising the possibility of covert suggestion and psychological direction….” (5)[ Disinformation Campaign ]
The disinformation techniques used by the government to conceal Directed-Energy Weapons development involves [emphasising] use of the term “Non-Lethal” to describe these technologies as well as surreptitiously embedding the development of these weapons within the haystack of other innocuous weapon developments such as immobilizing sticky foams, [temporay-blinding] lasers and pepper spray-like materials. (2)[ President Kennedy’s Warning ]
“The high office of President has been used to foment a plot to destroy American’s freedom and before I leave office I must inform the citizen of his plight.” — John F. Kennedy at Columbia University, 10 days before his assassination. (5)[ President Eisenhower’s Warning ]
Search for the video of President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s farewell speech in which he coined the term, “military-industrial complex” when sending a very chilling and serious warning to the American people regarding the looming dangers of a nation being overcome by policy for war contractors rather than policy for the people.[ Regulating DEW’s ]
Dr. Nick Begich … He is the editor of Earthpulse Flashpoints, a new-science book series and published articles in science, politics and education and is a well known lecturer, having presented throughout the United States and in nineteen countries. Begich has served as an expert witness and speaker before the European Parliament and has spoken on various issues for groups representing citizen concerns, statesmen and elected officials, scientists and others. He is the publisher and co-owner of Earthpulse Press and Executive Director of The Lay Institute of Technology, Inc. a Texas non-profit corporation. (He stated) “In February 1998, I testified before the European Union parliament for an hour and a half and convinced them of the detrimental effects of non lethal weapons on humans, their behavior and their minds. The EU was convinced and passed a resolution banning the use of weapons that can manipulate a person (see Parliament Resolution A4-005/99 entitled “Resolution on the Environment, Security, and Foreign Policy” passed on January 29, 1999). During the hearings, the US representative and NATO representatives sat in the back and declined to participate when asked. In the US, there is no such resolution or anything remotely close to being considered by any member of Congress. There is no concern for it in the US because no one knows about them.” (6)[ Russian & American Partnership for Directed Energy Weapons ]
Dr. Igor Smirnov, a Russian expert on non-lethal weapons, was brought to the US for a series of meetings in Virginia in 1993. The meetings were attended by representatives of the CIA, DIA, FBI, and ARPA, civilians included representatives of the NIMH and GMC‘s Director of Biomedical Research. Smirnov and his non-lethal weapons technology was brought to Waco during the Branch Davidian Siege in 1993 in hopes of using them on David Koresh, but a software problem reportedly made this impossible, and Smirnov could not guarantee its safety. (1)[ Experiment on the People ]
In 1940 scientists exposed four-hundred prisoners in Chicago with malaria (a US experiment Nazis cited at the Nuremberg trials to defend their own experimentation).68
During WWII, Seventh Day Adventist conscientious objectors were enlisted into Operation Whitecoat by the US Army and the Adventist Church. They were told that they were being tested for defensive research purposes while the government was in fact testing offensive chemical and biological weapons.69 (6)[ Experiment on the People some more ]
After WWII, matters became far worse for those who were caught up in the web of illegal scientific testing. In 1947 Colonel E.E. Kirkpatrick of the US Atomic Energy Commission issued a secret document stating that the agency would begin administering intravenous doses of radioactive substances to human subjects. At the same time atomic tests in which the residents of Utah and Nevada were purposely exposed to radioactive fallout. There were also a series of operations during
the 1940s and 1950s in which US cities were attacked secretly by the military through the spread of biological agents in order to track their propagation through a real population.70 (6)
“Dr. Ross Adey … determined that emotional states and behavior can be remotely influenced merely by placing a subject in an electromagnetic field. By directing a carrier frequency to stimulate the brain and using amplitude modulation to shape the wave to mimic a desired EEG frequency, he was able to impose a 4.5 CPS theta rhythm on his subjects. Drs. Joseph Sharp and Allen Frey experimented with microwaves seeking to transmit spoken words directly into the audio cortex via a pulsed-microwave analog of the speaker’s sound vibration. Indeed, Frey’s work in this field, dating back to 1960, gave rise to the so called “Frey effect” which is now more commonly referred to as “microwave hearing.” Within the Pentagon this ability is now known as “Artificial Telepathy.” Adey and others have compiled an entire library of frequencies and pulsation rates which can affect the mind and nervous system. (Guyatt)” (1)[ DEWs ]
While the effects of these weapons appear to be short-term and topical in nature, there is evidence that electromagnetic weapons have effects on the brain, including sleep disruption and behavior changes.108 They can produce anxiety and fear or compliance in humans. It is possible to use these weapons as a means of torture, yet without knowing exactly when, where, and how the weapons are used, we are left to speculate. 109 110 (6)[ Electromagnetic Warfare ]
Full scale electromagnetic warfare between the US and USSR began on July 4, 1976 when the Russians began broadcasting a broadband of short wave radio signal that could be heard all over the world. The signal is maintained at enormous expense and is made up of the most powerful radio transmitters in the world. The “Russian Woodpecker” radio signal varies between 3.26 and 17.5 megahertz, shortly after it came on line complaints were heard, mostly centered in Oregon, headaches, anxiety, lack of body coordination, and other symptoms…. the Soviets caught US intelligence unaware with their 100megawatt transmissions of extremely low frequency waves (ELF). The ELF pulse covered the frequency range of the brain. I had a hypothesis that this was a new mind control weapon that could entrain a human being‘s EEG. I designed an experiment and conclusively proved that the Soviet transmission could entrain the human brain and thereby induce behavioral modification. They (CIA) proved a certain ELF frequency could cause cancer, I have repeated these experiments and found this to be true…a single ELF frequency (classified) can cause cancer … Nothing stops or weakens these signals…. The government [U.S.] has built huge transmitters in South Africa, Australia and other places to beam ELF waves back to Russia. There is no shield that will stop these signals. (Kieth 203) (1)[ Military-Industrial Complex ]
The money involved in the non-lethal weapons industry is growing and military contractors are reaping the profits. According to Defense Industry Daily, Aaardvark Tactical, Inc. in Azusa, CA won a $50 million contract to develop non-lethal weapons, anti-terrorism capabilities, and riot gear.127 Ionatron was awarded a $12 million contract to develop the Laser Induced Plasma Channel technology which produces man-made lightening bolts.128 SAIC received a $49 million in November 2004 to develop High Power Microwave and other directed energy systems while Fiore Industries received a $16.35 million contract for similar technology and ITT received a $7.85 million contract for the same in 2000. 129 Fiore Industries received a $7.1 million for High Power Microwave Research and Experiment Program as early as 1994 and the same year Hughes Missile Systems Company received a $6.6 million contract for High Power Microwave Suppression of Enemy Air Defense Technology.130 Lockheed Martin secured a deal with DARPA in 2005 to continue the development of the Space Based Radar Antenna Technology in a $19.5 million contract.131 According to the Lockheed press release, the technology, “could significantly increase global persistent surveillance coverage”….In May of 2006, the Air Force issued $24 million in contracts for “Electro Magnetic Effects Research and Development” to Northrup Gruman, Voss Scientific, Lockheed Martin, Electro Magnetic Applications, and SAIC among others.132 (6)[ Russia Adopts Directed Energy Weapons as their “Go-To” Weapon of Mass Destruction ]
A good 2013 overview read from the Czech activist and writer, Mojmir Babacek. http://www.opednews.com/articles/How-Far-in-the-Future-is-t-by-mojmir-Babacek-130117-720.html[ Polish Defense Minister Reacts to Mind Control Weaponry ] [ Tempest In The Shadows ]
Part of the NSA’s Tempest Program allows for the distant detection and interpretation of electric emanations from electronics and computers. Even while much of the program’s techniques are still classified and documents are heavily redacted or blacked-out, these capabilities are acknowledged fact. Essentially, if the NSA or any agent has a target, they can access or obtain data from a remote system without tapping into wires or hacking into a system. It is all capable through SIGINT or radio antennaes and signals. It is a completely wireless and remote monitoring process. If the target were a laptop computer within a cabin on a hilltop and the Tempest Agent was at the bottom of the hill, the Agent could essentially determine what images or data is being processed on the laptop’s screen — all by the means of directed energy radio signals which capture emanating impulses from the laptop. There is absolutely no need for any visual or video contact — it is all done through electric signals. In the 1980’s the Tempest program at Lackland Air Force Base, in San Antonio, was certifying hundreds of technicians a year. (7)
The human body is basically an electro-chemical soup, of sorts. The human mind emanates electric impulses in its natural functioning processes. These electric impulse signals can also be captured with antennaes and interpreted through algorithms to provide an agent with the images and words that are being processed within a human mind. It’s just like Tempest technology, which has been around for a good while now. The evidence is often right in front of us, yet most of us never connect the dots. It sounds like the stuff of science fiction, but it’s not. How many people in the world are aware of this capability? Granted, it’s a scary thought to realize that one’s mind could be read. And, those who own these technological capabiities (military-industrial complex) don’t necessariliy want people getting scared, now do they? Those who wish to delve into this knowledge will find many published scientific studies and articles, as well as declassified material that will further their understanding of this reality. Through the literature I’ve read on this subject matter and through experiences I’ve witnessed within the scientific community, I can assure you that this technological capability is fairly well refined at this day and age. Though, I will be long dead before the day comes when this capability is common knowledge to the common man.
It’s funny, no sad, yes funny, because in 2016 many people would be in total awe if they saw the Youtube video of an ocean Destroyer shooting a drone out of the sky with a laser. Amazing as it is, this is one of the real-world weapons capabilities that our Navy has available right now. But, what’s not so funny and which is actually kinda scary, is the fact that this capability, although rudimentary, was possible over forty years ago. Yes, almost a half-century ago ! In 1973 DARPA’s early incarnation did the exact same thing over the skies of New Mexico. (8) So, I guess it is actually sad, becuse like the laser technology, the Tempest-Mind Reading capabilities will most likely go unknown to the common man for many, many years to come !
(1) “Monarch: The New Phoenix Program” By Marshall Thomas
(2) “New World Order and E.L.F. Psychotronic Tyranny” By C.B. Baker (Youth Action Newsletter, issued December 1994)
(3) “Weapons of Mass Coercion: The Hidden Use of Energy Weapons, HAARP, and Chemtrails for Political Control” By Byron Belitsos
(4) “The Hidden Evil” By Mark Rich
(5) “The Matrix Deciphered” By Robert Duncan
(6) “US Electromagnetic Weapons and Human Rights” By Peter Phillips, Lew Brown and Bridget Thornton
(7) “Tempest Timeline” https://cryptome.org/tempest-time.htm
(8) “The U.S. Military Shot Down a Drone With a Laser—in 1973” By Kyle Mizokami, Aug 30, 2016 Popular Mechanics
III. List of Patents Pertinent to Mind Control and Gang Stalking
For the full patents see: Project MK-Ultra and Mind Control Technology A Compilation of Patents and Reports Alex Balthazar.
Also Richard Lighthouse has a great free ebook: 34 Patents on Subliminal Mind Control you can download rlighthouse.com
Artificial Telepathy (also known as V2K)
# 3,629,521, Hearing Systems, Henery K. Puharich Ossining and Joseph L. Lawrence, Filed 1/8/70
# 3,647, 970 Method and System for Simplifying Speech Waveforms, Gillis P. Flanagan, Filed 8/29/68
# 4,858,612, Hearing Device, Philip L. Stocklin Filed 12/19/83
# 4,877,027, Hearing System Wayne B. Brunkan, Filed 6/6/88
# 6,587,729, Apparatus For Audibly Communicating Speech Using The Radio Frequency Hearing Effect, James P. O’Loughlin & Diana L. Loree, Filed 4/24/02
# 5,047,994 Supersonic Bone Conduction Hearing Aid and Method, Martin L. Lenhardt, Alex M. Clarke & William Regeison, Filed 11/2/90
#4,717,343 Method of Changing A Person’s Behavior, Alan B. Densky, Filed 6/30/86
#5,784,124 Supraliminal Method of Education With Particular Application Behavior Modification, Joseph Anthony D’ Alitalia & Talbert Mead, Filed 6/11/96
#5,868,103 Method and Apparatus For Controlling an Animal, Randal D. Boyd Filed 6/30/97
#6,258,022 Behavior Modification, John Edward Rose, Filed 1/15/99
#6,039,688 Therapeutic Behavior Modification Program, Compliance Monitoring and Feedback System, Peter Douglas, Evan Dudik, John Evans & A lan Kritzer, Filed 10/31/97
Nervous System Manipulation
#2,995,633 Means For Aiding Hearing, Henry K. Puharich & Joseph L. Lawrence, Filed 9/25/58
#3,156,787 Solid State Hearing System, Henry K. Puharich, Filed 9/25/58
#3,170,993 Means for Aiding Hearing By Electrical Stimulation, Joseph Lawrence, Filed 1/8/62
#3,835,833 Method For Obtaining Neurophyciological Effects, Aime Limoge, Filed 9/21/72
#3,967,616 Multichannel System For And A Multifactorial Method of Controlling the Nervous System of a Living Organism, Sidney A. Ross, Filed 9/5/74
#4,034,741 Noise Generator and Transmitter, Guy Emery Adams & Jesse Carden, Jr, Filed 2/17/76
#4,082,918 Audio Analgesic Unit, Roland Wan-chan Chang & Charles A. Graves, Filed 1/21/77
#4,191,175 Method and Apparatus for Repetitively Producing A Noise-Like Audible Signal, William L. Nagle Filed 1/16/78
#5,935,054 Magnetic Excitation of Sensory Resonances, Hendricus G. Loos, Filed 6/7/95
#6,091,994 Pulsatile Manipulation of Nervous System, Hendricus G. Loos, Filed 8/31/98
#6,167,304 Pulse Variability in Electric Field Manipulation of Nervous System, Hendricus G. Loos Filed 6/17/99
#6,238,333 Remote Magnetic Manipulation of Nervous System, Hendricus G. Loos, Filed 8/10/99
#6,506,148 Nervous System Manipulation By Electromagnetic Fields From Monitors, Hendricus G. Loos, Filed 6/1/01
#6,939,288 Auditory Therapy Systems Impacting the Nervous System, Yakov I. Levin, Filed 12/26/96
#4,800,893 Kinesthetic Physical Movement Feedback Display For Controlling The Nervous System of a Living Organism, Filed 6/10/87
#3,712,292 Method and Apparatus For Producing Swept Frequency- Modulated Audio Signal Patterns For Inducing Sleep, John E. Zentmeyer Jr., Filed 7/20/71
#3,727,616 Electronic System For The Stimulation of Biological Systems, Herbert Lenzkes, Filed 6/15/71
#3,782,006 Means and Methods to Assist People in Building Up An Aversion to Undesirable Habits, Eliot N. Symmes, Filed 5/26/72
#3,884,218 Method of Inducing and Maintaining Various Stages of Sleep in the Human Being, Robert A. Monroe, Filed 9/30/70
#4,414,344 Sound Recording System, Louis J. Barbara, Filed 5/2/78
#4,227,516 Apparatus For Electrophysiological Stimulation, Bruce C. Meland, Filed 12/13/78
#4,315,502 Learning-Relaxation Device, Denis E. Gorges, Filed 10/11/79
#4,335,710 Device for the Induction of Specific Brain Wave Patterns, John D. Williamson, Filed 1/16/80
#4,388,918 Mental Harmonization Process, Charles C. Filley, 6/5/81
#4,508,105 Shadow Generating Apparatus, Glen A. Whitten, Filed 8/8/83
#4,573,449 Method For Stimulating the Falling Asleep And/Or Relaxing Behavior of A Person and an Arrangement Thererfor, Egon F. Warnke, Filed 3/8/83
#4,664,117 Apparatus and Method for Generating Phosphenes, Stephen C. Beck, Filed 10/9/84
#4,834,701 Apparatus For Inducing Frequency Reduction in Brain Wave, Kazumi Masaki, Filed 6/24/85
#4,858,612 Hearing Device, Philip Stocklin, 12/19/83
#4,877,027 Hearing System, Wayne B. Brunkan, Filed 6/6/88
#4,889,526 Non-Invasive Method and Apparatus For Modulating Brain Signals Through An External Magnetic or Electric Field to Reduce Pain, Elizabeth A. Rauscher & William L. Van Bise, Filed 11/13/87
#5,036,858 Method and Apparatus For Changing Brain Wave Frequency, John L. Carter, Filed 3/22/90
#5,076,281 Device and Method for Effecting Rythmic Body Activity, Benjamin Gavish, Filed 4/16/91
#5,101,810 Apparatus and Method For Therapeutic Application of Vibro-Acoustical Energy to Human Body, Olav Skille, Steinkjer, Svein Sorsdal, Trondheim, Filed 4/16/90
#5,123,899 Method and System Alerting Consciousness, James Gall Filed 1/17/91
#5,135,468 Method and Apparatus of Varying the Brain State of a Person By Means of an Audio Signal, Juergen P. Meissner, Filed 8/2/90
#5,151,080 Method and Apparatus For Inducing and Establishing A Changed State of Consciousness, Claus Bick, Filed 8/28/90
#5,123,899 Method and System For Altering Consciousness, James Gall, Filed 1/17/91
#5,135,468 Method and Apparatus of Varying the Brain State of a Person by Means of an Audio Signal, Juergen P. Meissner, 8/2/90
#5,151,080 Method and Apparatus For Inducing and Establishing A Changed State of Consciousness, Claus Bick, 8/28/50
#5,213,562 Method of Inducing Mental Emotional and Physical States of Consciousness, Including Specific Mental Activity, In Human Being, Robert A. Monroe, Filed 4/25/90
#5,289,438 Method and System For Altering Consciousness, James Gall, Filed 4/13/92
#5,219,322 Psychotherapy Apparatus and Method For Treating Undesirable Emotional Arousal of A Patient, Lawrence R. Weathers, Filed 6/1/92
#5,304,122 Stress Reduction System and Method, Theresia A. Mrklas, Filed 10/16/91
#5,330,414 Brain Wave Inducing Apparatus, Mitsuo Yasushi, Filed 2/11/92
#5,352,181 Method and Recording For Producing Sounds and Messages to Achieve Alpha and Theta Brainwave States and Positive Emotional States in Humans, Mark E. Davis, Filed 9/2/92
#5,356,368 Method of and Apparatus for Inducing Desired States of Consciousness, Robert Monroe, Filed 3/1/91
#5,479,941 Device for Inducing Altered States of Consciousness, Michael Harner, Filed 10/18/93
#5,480,374 Method and Apparatus for Reducing Physiological Stress, Robert C. Van Dick, Filed 3/28/94
#5,495,853 System for Evoking Electroencephalogram Signals, Mitsou Yasushi, Filed 9/14/94
#5,551,879 Dream State Teaching Machine, Arthur D. Raynie, Raul G. Rodriguez, Gary L. Forister, Alexander B. Crawford, Filed 9/16/94
#5,562,597 Method and Apparatus for Reducing Physiological Stress, Robert C. Van Dick, Filed 8/1/95
#5,586,967 Method and Recording for Producing Sounds and Messages to Achieve Alpha and Theta Brainwave States and Positive Emotional States in Humans
#5,595,488 Apparatus and Method for Monitoring and Improving the Alertness of a Subject, Eli Gozlan, Kiryat Motzkin, Shlomo Breznitz, Haifa, Dan Nir, Haifa Sharon Erlich, 8/4/94
#5,954,629 Brain Wave Inducing System, Masatoshi Yanagidaira, Yuichi Kimikawa, Takeshi Fukami, Mitsuo Yasushi, Filed 1/31/97
#5,954,630 FM Theta-Inducing Audible Sound and Method, Device and Recorded Medium to Generate the Same, Kazumi Masaki Osamu Matsuda, Filed 9/14/94
#6,135,944 Method of Inducing Harmonious States of Being, Gerard D. Bowman, Edward M. Karam, Steven C. Benson, Filed 11/6/98
#6,219,657 Device and Method for Creation of Emotions, Akemi Hatayama, Filed 3/13/98
#6,430,443 Method and Apparatus for Treating Auditory Hallucinations, Manuel Karell, Filed 8/6/02
#6,488,617 Method and Device for Producing a Desired Brain State, Bruce F. Katz, Filed 10/13/00
#8,636,640 Method and System for Brain Entertainment, Daniel Wonchul Chang, Filed 4/11/09
#6,729,337 Method and System for Generating Sensory Data Onto the Human Neural Cortex, Thomas P. Dawson, Filed 1/28/03
#7,988,613 Method and Apparatus for the Treatment of Physical and Mental Disorders with Low Frequency, Low Flux Density Magnetic Fields, Paul Becker, Filed 4/14/10
US 2003/0171688 Mind Controller, Jae Sup Yoo, Filed 7/19/02
#3,753,433 Electroencephalophone and Feedback System, Frank Bakerich, Robert T. Scully, Filed 1/18/71
#4,354,505 Method of and Apparatus For Testing and Indicating Relaxation State of a Human Subject, Kazumasa Shiga, Filed 10/19/82
#3,951,134 Apparatus and Method For Remotely Monitoring and Altering Brain Waves, Robert G. Malech, Filed 8/5/74
#4,958,638 Non-Contact Vital Signs Monitor, Steven M. Sharpe, Joseph Seals, Anita H. MacDonald, Filed 6/30/88
#4,699,153 System For Assessing Verbal Psychobiological Correlates, Howard Shervrin, William J. Williams, Robert E. Marshall, Filed 4/23/85
#4,951,674 Biomagnetic Analytical System Using Fiber-Obtic Magnetic Sensors, Michael F. Zanakis, Filed 3/20/89
#5,392,788 Method and Device For Interpreting Concepts and Conceptual Thought From Brainwave Data and for Assisting for Diagnosis of Brainwave Dysfunction, William J. Hudspeth, Filed 3/3/93
#5,458,142 Device for Monitoring A Magnetic Field Emanating From an Organism, Edward J. Farmer, Diane J. Hovey, Filed 3/19/93
#5,507,291 Method and an Associated Apparatus for Remotely Determining Information As To Person’s Emotional State, Robert C. Stirbl, Filed 3/5/94
#5,522,386 Apparatus Particularly For Use In The Determination of the Condition of the Vegetative Part of the Nervous System, Eduardo N. Lerner, Filed 4/29/92
#5,557,199 Magnetic Resonance Monitor, Joseph D. Bowman, Daniel P. Engel, III, Filed 4/29/94
#5,649,061 Device and Method For Estimating A Mental Decision, Christopher C. Smyth, Filed 5/11/95
#5,922,016 Apparatus for Electric Stimulation of Auditory Nerves of a Human Being, Hermann Wagner, 1/26/96
#6,006,188 Speech Signal Processing for Determining Psychological or Physiological Characteristics Using a Knowledgeable Base, Rostislav Bogdashevsky, Vladimir Alexeer, Vitaly Yarigin, George Baker, Harrison Stanton, Filed 3/19/97
#6,011,991 Communication System and Method Including Brain Wave Analysis and/or Use of Brain Activity, Aris Mardirossian, Filed 12/7/98
#6,292,688 Method and Apparatus for Analyzing Neurological Response to Emotion-Inducing Stimuli, Richard E. Patton, Filed 2/28/96
#6,842,637 Magnetic Field Measurement Apparatus, Keiji Tsukada, Akihiko Kandori, Tsuyoshi Miyashita, Hiroyuki Suzuki, Hitoshi Sasabuchi, Filed 9/10/01
US 2010/0234697 Systems, Devices, and Monitoring a Subject, Timothy J. Walter, Uma Marar, Filed 4/29/08
#4,408,616 Brain Electrical Activity Mapping, Frank H. Duffy, Norman D. Culver, Filed 5/15/81
Directed Energy Weapons
#3,566,347 Psycho-Acoustic Projector, Andrew E. Flanders, Filed 2/23/71
#4,349,898 Sonic Weapons System, William Drewes, Filed 11/9/78
#5,774,088 Method and System for Warning Birds of Hazards, Melvin Kreithen, Filed 5/8/97
#4,959,559 Electromagnetic or Other Directed Energy Pulse Launcher, Richard W. Ziolkowski, Filed 3/31/89
#5,864,517 Pulsed Combustion Acoustic Wave Generator, John B. Hinkey, Joseph T. Williams, Thomas R.A. Bussing, Filed 3/21/97
#5,973,999 Acoustic Cannon, John T. Naff, James H. Shea, Filed 9/29/97
#8,049,173 Dual Use RF Directed Energy Weapon and Imager, Kenneth W. Brown, Filed 5/17/07
#5,551,016 Monitoring System and Interface Apparatus Therefor, Gerald E. Leob, Roy A. Young, Kevin H. Hood, Filed 7/1/93
#7,076,441 Identification and Tracking of Persons Using RFID-Tagged Items In Store Environments, John R. Hind, James M. Mathewson, Marcia L. Peters, Filed 5/3/01
#6,947,978 Method for Geolocating Logistical Network Addresses, Stephen Mark Huffman, Michael Henry Reifer, Filed 12/29/00
#7,805,291 Method of Identifying Topic of Text Using Nouns, Sidney Berkowitz, Filed 5/25/05
#8,479,225 Social and Interactive Applications for Mass Media, Michele Covell, Shumeet Baluja, Michael Fink, Filed 11/27/06
#8,959,573 Noise, Encryption, and Decoys for Communications in a Dynamic Computer Network, Wayne B. Smith, Charles Powers, Ellen K. Lin, Christopher T. Dowin, Ryan E. Sharpe, 5/1/12
US 2008/0220749 Acquiring Identity Parameters by Emulating Base Stations, Andrew Paul Pridmore, Paul Maxwell Martin, Riki Benjamin Dolby, Filed 9/11/08
Implants and Nanotech
#5,211,129 Syringe-Implantable Identification Transponder, Vern Taylor, Daniel Koturov, John Bradin, Gerald E. Leob, Filed 1/25/91
#3,951,132 Implant and Implanting Method, Louis Bucalo, Filed 5/15/74
#5,522,865 Voltage/Current Control System For Human Tissue Simulator, Filed 10/12/94
#5,629,678 Personal Tracking and Recovery System, Paul A. Gargano, David H. Gilmore, Frank A. Pace, Lee Weinstein, Filed 1/10/95
#5,868,100 Fenceless Animal Control System Using GPS Location Information, Robert E. Marsh, 1/30/97
#6,014,080 Body Worn Active and Passive Tracking Device, Hoyt M. Layson, Jr, Filed 10/28/98
#6,067,474 Implantable Device with Improved Battery Recharging and Powering Configuration, Joseph H. Schulman, Robert Dan Dell, Alfred E. Mann, Michael A. Faltys, Filed 7/31/98
#6,164,284 System of Implantable Devices for Monitoring and/or Affecting Body Parameters, Joseph H. Schulman, Robert Dan Dell, Filed 3/25/98
#6,205,361 Implantable Expandable Multicontact Electrodes, Janusz A. Kuzma, Carla M. Mann, Filed 1/29/99
#6,175,764 Implantable Microstimulator System for Producing Repeatable Patterns of Electrical Stimulation, Gerald E. Loeb, Frances J. R. Richmond, Filed 1/25/00
#6,214,032 System for Implanting a Microstimulator, Gerald E. Loeb, Frances J. R. Richmond, Filed 1/25/00
#6,239,705 Intra Oral Electronic Tracking Device, Jeffrey Glen, Filed 4/19/00
#8,477,392 Brain-Machine Interface Systems and Methods, Rodolfo R. Llinas, Filed 7/11/07
#4,395,600 Auditory Subliminal Message System and Method, Rene R. Lundy, Filed 11/26/80
#4,616,261 Method and Apparatus for Generating Subliminal Visual Messages, James R. Crawford, Michael H. Erb, Filed 10/17/83
#4,692,118 Video Subconscious Display Attachment, Richard E. Mould, 1/28/86
#4,734,037 Message Screen, J. Patrick McClure, Filed 2/21/86
#4,777,529 Auditory Subliminal Programming System, Richard M. Schultz, Raymond Dolejs, 7/21/87
#4,821,326 Non-Audible Speech Generation Method and Apparatus, Norman MacLeod, Filed 11/16/87
#4,924,744 Apparatus For Generating Sound Through Low Frequency and Noise Modulation, Kimio Yamamura, Filed 8/9/88
#5,017,143 Method and Apparatus for Producing Subliminal Images, Alan Backus and Ronald Popeil, 4/4/89
#6,426,919 Portable and Hand-Held Device For Making Humanly Audible Sounds Responsive to the Detecting of Ultrasonic Sounds, William A. Gerosa, Filed 1/4/01
#5,027,208 Therapeutic Subliminal Imaging System, Joseph J. Dwyer Jr, Loy R. White, Matthew K. Haggerty, John A. Purbrick, Filed 1/16/90
#5,128,765 System for Implementing the Synchronized Superimposition of Subliminal Signals, Robert T. Dingwall, Howard T. Bellin, Filed 11/29/88
#5,134,484 Superimposing Method and Apparatus Useful for Subliminal Messages, Filed 6/1/89
#5,159,703 Silent Subliminal Presentation System, Oliver M. Lowery, Filed 12/28/89
#5,170,381 Method for Mixing Audio Subliminal Recordings, Eldon Taylor, James R. Woodhams, Filed 11/22/89
#5,175,571 Glasses with Subliminal Message, Faye Tanefsky, Michael R. McCaughey, Filed 1/11/91
#5,194,008 Subliminal Image Modulation Projection and Detection System and Method, William L. Mohan, Samuel P. Willits, Steven V. Pawlowski, Filed 3/26/92
#5,215,468 Method and Apparatus for Introducing Subliminal Changes to Audio Stimuli, Martha A. Lauffer, Donald K. Lauffer, Filed 3/11/91
#5,211,962 Subliminal Device Having Manual Adjustment of Perception Level of Subliminal Messages, Alan L. Backus, Ronald Popeil, Casey Walsh, Jerry Lawson, Filed 8/14/90
#5,224,864 Method of Recording and Reproducing Subliminal Signals That are 180 Degrees out of Phase, Steven Vavagiakis, 3/25/91
#5,245,666 Personal Subliminal Messaging System, Bruce T. Mikell, Filed 6/6/91
#5,270,800 Subliminal Message Generator, Robert L. Sweet, Filed 8/28/90
#5,644,363 Apparatus for Superimposing Visual Subliminal Instructional Materials on Video Signal, Talbert Mead, 3/24/95
#5,539,705 Ultrasonic Speech Translator and Communications Systems, M. Alfred Akerman, Curtis W. Ayers, Howard D. Haynes, Filed 10/27/94
#6,052,336 Apparatus and Method of Broadcasting Audible Sound Using Ultrasonic Sound as a Carrier, Austin Lowrey, 5/1/98
#6,122,322 Subliminal Message Protection, Magnus Jandel, Filed 5/13/99
IV. Directed Energy Weapon / Targeted Individual Patents
They are going to kill 2 billion people in the world with this technology. Summary history of mind control developments:
1949: Mind control is possible. (Operation Lydia)
1950: Most of the brain’s frequencies were identified and used in mind control.
1952: Could create cataracts.
1956: Pulses that change the way the brain thinks were used. These pulses can cause organ failure, birth defects, whole body organism failure.
1962: Operation Pandora which involved hundreds of thousands of people around the world. checked for all cellular damage, brain emotion, moods
1965: Pandora adopted by US military
1971: Cancer was proven. Blood-brain barrier could be breached giving DOD access to your brain.
1972: Crowd control by microwaves was accomplished.
1990: OPERATION Sleeping Beauty. Ronald Reagan legalized all microwave weapons.
Today: We have The Growler can be used from vehicles, drones.
Barrie Trower, British M15 physicist
Patent No. freq Wave type Symptom(s) Filing Date Publication Date Invented By Original Assignee Descripton
US 6091994 A 1/2hz and 2.4Hz MK 31-Aug-98 18-Jul-00 Hendricus G. Loos Loos, Hendricus G. Pulsative Manipulation of Central Nervous Systems
US 6488617 B1 1-8hz M MK 13-Oct-00 3-Dec-02 Bruce F. Katz Universal Hedonics Method and Device for Producing a Desired Brain State via magnetic waves
US 7629918 B2 “RFDE” and radar location and disruption (“multi-functional”) 15-Dec-05 8-Dec-09 Kenneth W. Brown, David J. Canich, Russell F. Berg Raytheon Company Weapon with integrated targeting system to locate targets. Damages/disrupts electronics, biological entities, and physical structures.
US 6470214 B1 3,500 Hz (probably) V2k 13-Dec-96 22-Oct-02 James P. O’Loughlin, Diana L. Loree United States Air Force Remotely transmits intelligible subjective sound into target consciousness. (“Voice to Skull”)
US 3393279 V2K 13-Mar-62 16-Jul-68 G.P. Flanagan Listening Incorporated Allows information to be remotely conveyed to subject via electromagnetic waves.
US 3951134 100, 110, 210 MHz MK 5-Aug-74 20-Apr-76 Robert G. Malech Dorne & Margolin, Inc. Apparatus and method for remotely monitoring and altering a target’s brain waves / central nervous system
US 4395600 MK 26-Nov-80 26-Jul-83 Rene R. Lundy & David L. Tyler Subliminal manipulation of subjective emotions via remotely directed audio waves
US 4834701 4-16 Hz MK 24-Jul-85 30-May-89 Kazumi MasakiKen Hayashibara Remote neurological control via sets of low frequency waves beamed at brain
US 4858612 A microwave spectrum V2K 19-Dec-83 22-Aug-89 Philip L. StocklinStocklin Philip L Transmits sound to auditory cortex of mammals via remotely-applied microwave signals.
US 4877027 A 100-10,000 MHz V2K 6-Jun-88 31-Oct-89 Wayne B. Brunkan Brunkan Wayne B Transmits sound to auditory cortex of mammals via bursts of remotely applied microwaves.
US 5123899 A 40-80 Hz, two signals sent, which vary by 0.5-2Hz E MK 17-Jan-91 23-Jun-92 James Gall James Gall Alters mood, emotion, sleep states via remotely applied frequencies and wave forms
US 5159703 A 14.5 kHz E V2K 28-Dec-89 27-Oct-92 Oliver M. Lowery Oliver M. Lowery Presents subliminal auditory information to the human via remotely applied waves
US 5356368 A 4-212 Hz MK 1-Mar-91 18-Oct-94 Robert A. Monroe Interstate Industries Inc. (dba Monroe Products) Method of and apparatus for inducing desired states of consciousness
US 6587729 B2 V2K 24-Apr-02 1-Jul-03 James P. O’Loughlin, Diana L. Loree US Air Force Apparatus for audibly communicating speech using the radio frequency hearing effect
US 6052336 A V2K 1-May-98 18-Apr-00 Austin Lowrey, III Lowrey, Iii; Austin Apparatus and method of broadcasting audible sound using ultrasonic sound as a carrier
US 6011991 A IR, RF or satelliteRV, MK 7-Dec-98 4-Jan-00 Aris Mardirossian Technology Patents, Llc Remotely identifies individuals by brainwave signature; monitors words, phrases, and thoughts by brain activity
US 5889870 A Voice 17-Jul-96 30-Mar-99 Elwood G. Norris American Technology Corporation (Now LRAD Corp, which stands for Long Range Acoustic Device products) Makes voices emanate from individuals who do not intend or realize it. “Ventriloquist Effect”.
US 5507291 A 300-1,000 Hz RV 5-Apr-94 16-Apr-96 Robert C. Stirbl, Peter J. Wilk Stirbl; Robert C., Wilk; Peter J. Method for remotely determining information relating to a person’s emotional state.
US 3393279 A V2K 13-Mar-62 16-Jul-68 Patrick Flanagan Gillis Listening Inc Remotely cause individual to hear voices via EMF waves – imperceptible to anyone else.
US 3647970 A 50 kHz E V2K 29-Aug-68 7-Mar-72 Gillis P FlanaganGillis P Flanagan Remotely cause individual to hear voices via EMF waves – imperceptible to anyone else.
US 8579793 B1 0 Hz – 5 kHz MK 27-Jan-11 12-Nov-13 James David Honeycutt, John Clois Honeycutt, Jr, James David Honeycutt, John Clois Honeycutt, Jr Controls brain state by placing engineered EMF patterns into the AC wiring of a building.
US 20140309484 A1 MK 24-Jan-14 16-Oct-14 Daniel Wonchul Chang Daniel Wonchul Chang Induce desired brain state in person by adding waves into a music file
US 6488617 B1 M MK 13-Oct-00 3-Dec-02 Bruce F. Katz Universal Hedonics Monitor and control the brain state of an individual via pulsed magnetic fields aimed at brain
US 6506148 B2 1/2 – 2.4 Hz E MK 1-Jun-01 14-Jan-03 Hendricus G. Loos Hendricus G. Loos Manipulation subject brain waves via frequencies emanating from computer and TV screens
US 6487531 B1 M Voice 6-Jul-99 26-Nov-02 Carol A. Tosaya, John W. Sliwa, Jr Carol A. Tosaya, John W. Sliwa, Jr Makes voices emanate from individuals who do not intend or realize it. “Ventriloquist Effect”. Also functions for voice-recognition.
US 6426919 B1 Voice 4-Jan-01 30-Jul-02 William A. Gerosa William A. Gerosa Portable, hand-held device for producing humanly audible sounds and voices.
US 6292688 B1 NM 28-Feb-96 18-Sep-01 Richard E. Patton Advanced Neurotechnologies, Inc. Method and Apparatus for Analyzing Neurological Response to Emotion-Inducing Stimuli
US 6239705 B1 Loc 19-Apr-00 29-May-01 Jeffrey Glen Jeffrey Glen Intra oral electronic tracking device that can be implanted in teeth, dentures, etc.
US 6167304 A MK 17-Jun-99 26-Dec-00 Hendricus G. Loos Loos; Hendricus G. Remotely manipulates central nervous system of subject by applying electric field to skin
US 6135944 A MK 6-Nov-98 24-Oct-00 Gerard D. Bowman, Edward M. Karam, Steven C. Benson Zebedee Research, Inc. Induce desired brain state via vibrational stimuli, preferably sound
US 8636640 B2 MK 11-Apr-09 15-Oct-09 Daniel Wonchul Chang Daniel Wonchul Chang Induces a desired brain state via modification of music files.
US 6081744 A 1/2Hz – 2KHz E MK 17-Jul-98 27-Jun-00 Hendricus G. Loos Loos; Hendricus G. Manipulates the nervous system of a subject through remotely applied electric fields
US 6017302 A 1/2 – 2.5 Hz E MK 31-Oct-97 25-Jan-00 Hendricus G. Loos Loos; Hendricus G. Induces desired emotional state through remote EMFs. E.g., sleepiness, sexual arousal.
US 5935054 A 1/2Hz M MK 17-Jun-95 10-Aug-99 Hendricus G. Loos Loos; Hendricus G. Remotely causes subject to feel bodily swaying – i.e., earthquake or “rock the baby” sensation.
US 5899922 A 1/2 – 2.4 Hz E MK 14-Nov-97 4-May-99 Hendricus G. Loos Loos; Hendricus G. Induces desired emotional state through remote EMFs. E.g., sleepiness, sexual arousal.
US 5782874 A E MK 24-Jan-97 21-Jul-98 Hendricus G. Loos Loos; Hendricus G. Controls emotional state of subject, e.g., sleepiness, sexual arousal, slow mental processes.
US 6006188 A NM 19-Mar-97 21-Dec-99 Rostislav Bogdashevsky, Vladimir Alexeev, Vitaly Yarigin, George Baker, Harrison Stanto Dendrite, Inc Assesses psychological, physiological characteristics of a subject based on voice characteristics
US5954630 A 2Hz-20Hz MK 14-Sep-94 21-Sep-99 Kazumi Masaki, Osamu Matsuda Ken Hayashibara Controls human brainwaves by superimposing waves onto audio wave signals
US 5586967 A MK 27-Jun-94 24-Dec-96 Mark E. Davis Davis; Mark E. Controls human brainwaves by superimposing hidden phrases onto music signals
US 5539705 A MK 27-Oct-94 23-Jul-96 M. Alfred Akerman, Curtis W. Ayers, Howard D. Haynes Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc. Transmits hidden speech; reconverts to normal speech signals at intended destination
US 6490480 B1 NM 14-Sep-00 3-Dec-02 Eduard LernerEduard Lerner Monitors subject neurological condition via EMFs remotely aimed at the skin.
US 5392788 A MK 3-Feb-93 28-Feb-95 William J. Hudspeth Hudspeth; William J. Reads subject brainwaves and sends stimuli to subject to alter their brainwaves as desired
US 5330414 A MK 11-Feb-92 19-Jul-94 Mitsuo Yasushi Pioneer Electronic Corporation Controls subject brainwaves by shining a modulated light signal into the subject’s eyes.
US 5289438 A MK 13-Apr-92 22-Feb-94 James Gall James Gall Alters subject brain state via application of a variety of wave frequencies and forms.
US 7674224 B2 MK 14-Oct-05 9-Mar-10 Adam Hewett Vitrepixel Holdings, Llc Controls subject brain state by adding covert frequencies onto a musical composition.
US 5213562 A MK 25-Apr-90 25-May-93 Robert A. Monroe Interstate Industries Inc. Controls brain state via modulated audio signals aimed at target subject.
US 5170381 A MK 22-Nov-89 8-Dec-92 Eldon Taylor, James R. Woodhams Eldon Taylor, Woodhams James R Method for superimposing hidden subliminal messaging into audio/music files.
US 5151080 A MK 28-Aug-90 29-Sep-92 Claus Bick Claus Bick Changes the brain state of subjects through electroacoustic means.
US 5135468 A MK 2-Aug-90 4-Aug-92 Juergen P. Meissner Meissner Juergen P Controls the brain state of a person by applying differing audio signals into each ear.
US 5123899 A MK 17-Jan-91 23-Jun-92 James Gall James Gall Controls the brain state by application of a variety of wave frequencies and forms.
US 4958638 A PM 30-Jun-88 25-Sep-90 Steven M. Sharpe, Joseph Seals, Anita H. MacDonald, Scott R. Crowgey Georgia Tech Research Corporation Remotely monitors heart rate and perspiration through the use of directed EMFs. WO 2015174879 A1 60 GHz PM 15-Apr-15 19-Nov-15 Milan Savić, Veselin BRANKOVIĆ, Darko TASOVAC, Dušan GRUJIĆ, Veljko MIHAJLOVIĆ, Pavle JOVANOVIĆ Novelic D.O.O. Monitors vital signs of subject via remote application of radar waves. Hand-held.
US 20100324415 A1 1-100 GHz PM 5-Apr-10 23-Dec-10 Darrel D. Drinan, Carl F. Edman, Naresh C. Bhavaraju Philometron, Inc. Measures tissue damage of subject via remote application of electromagnetic waves.
US 20130001422 A1 PM 28-Jun-12 3-Jan-13 Gary Dean Lavon, Courtney Wasson, Bryan Keith Waye, Uwe Schober, Michael Franke, Stefan Hubert Hollinger, Nadia Patricia LAABS, Robert Joseph Schick The Procter & Gamble Company Remote monitoring of the physical condition of a living subject
US 7811234 B2 PM 30-Aug-07 12-Oct-10 William R. McGrath California Institute of Technology Remotely monitors of a subject’s physiological health and status, esp., the heart.
US 4924744 A Voice 9-Aug-88 15-May-90 Kimio Yamamura Hudson Soft Co., Ltd. Generates and propagates artificial sound and voice sounds that will be heard by a target.
US 4616261 A MK 17-Oct-83 7-Oct-86 James R. Crawford, Jerald L. Winegeart, Michael H. Erb Stimutech, Inc. Superimposes subliminal imaging onto a subject’s existing television signal.
US 4395600 A MK 26-Nov-80 26-Jul-83 Rene R. Lundy, David L. Tyler Lundy Rene R, Tyler David L Controls mental state of subjects by adding imperceptible subliminal messaging to audio signals.
US 9433789 B2 MK 14-Mar-14 6-Sep-16 Laura Tyler Perryman, Chad Andresen Micron Devices Llc Apparatus for remote neural control of subjects via an implanted RF circuit
US 8892208 B2 MK 13-Jun-13 18-Nov-14 Michael P. Flynn, Parag G. Patil, Hyo Gyuem Rhew, Jaehun Jeong Univeristy of Michigan Regents Remotely reads brain waves, sends back response to achieve desired brain state.
US 5788648 A 1-30 Hz MK 4-Mar-97 4-Aug-98 Eric Tab NadelQuantum Interference Devices, Inc. Reads subject brain state by sending stimuli and then reading/receiving response
US 7689272 B2 NM 7-Jun-02 30-Mar-10 Lawrence Farwell Lawrence Farwell Reads brain waves to monitor participation in organizations, specific activities, etc
US 20160375220 A1 5-40 Hz MK 1-Mar-16 29-Dec-16 Joel Steven Goldberg Joel Steven Goldberg Controls human behavior via targeting human brain with ELF (extremely low frequency) EMFs
US 7609001 B2 Disable 6-Dec-06 27-Oct-09 James G. SmallRaytheon Company Device that is able to direct high-power magnetic waves at a target for weapon purposes.
US 4700068 A Disable 31-Jan-86 13-Oct-87 Frederick J. McClung, Jr., James G. Small Hughes Aircraft Company Allows extremely precise aim of particle beams over distances of up to several thousand miles
US 7405834 B1 1 kHz Aim 15-Feb-06 29-Jul-08 Joseph C. Marron, Carl W. Embry, AnnMarie Oien, Duane D. Smith, J. Alex Thomson, James Pete Tucker, Samuel G. L. Williams Lockheed Martin Corporation Imaging device that improves the aim of directed energy weapons
US 20120274147 A1 M MK 19-Oct-11 1-Nov-12 Frederick P. Stecher, Christopher Fuller Alliant Techsystems Inc Technique for wireless transmission of magnetic waves for use w/ energy weapons
US 8049173 B1 E Multi 17-May-07 1-Nov-11 Kenneth W. Brown Raytheon CompanyCombination RF directed energy weapon and imaging (visual monitoring) tool
US 2860627 A MK 26-Mar-53 18-Nov-58 Charles M Harden, Marshall Curtis Charles M Harden, Marshall Curtis Reads subject brain waves by applying light stimulation to brain and reading response.
US 2995633 A V2K 25-Sep-58 8-Aug-61 Lawrence Joseph L, Puharich Henry K Lawrence Joseph L, Puharich Henry K Causes subject to hear audible sounds by transmitting electrical (inaudible) waves at face
US 3566347 A MK 27-Apr-67 23-Feb-71 Andrew E Flanders Gen Dynamics Corp A system for producing aural psychological disturbances and partial deafness in the enemy.
US 20020002464 A1 NM 31-Aug-99 3-Jan-02 Valery A. Petrushin Valery A. Petrushin A system for monitoring emotions by listening to a conversation between at least two persons.
US 8965770 B2 NM 29-Mar-11 24-Feb-15 Valery A. Petrushin Accenture Global Services Limited A system for detecting emotion in voice signals by monitoring phone conversations.
US 7282727 B2 MK 23-Oct-13 13-May-14 Todd Eisenberg, Herbert Parker Genesis Illumination, Inc. Psychologically/physically incapacitates subject via the remote application of pulsed light.
US 6559769 B2 NM 7-Dec-01 6-May-03 Eric Anthony, Joseph Phillips Eric Anthony, Joseph Phillips Monitoring system comprised of microprocessors installed in vehicles, personal property and homes to continually monitor and determine undesirable behavior in targeted individuals. Remedial action can be taken when “abnormal” behavior is indicated.
US 6873261 B2 NM 17-Jan-03 29-Mar-05 Eric Anthony, Joseph Phillips Eric Anthony, Joseph Phillips Monitors and determines undesirable behavior in humans via wireless microprocessors in vehicles, personal property and homes
US 20080282817 A1 Locate 26-Oct-07 20-Nov-08 David S. BreedIntelligent Tech International Inc Remotely monitors & uploads presence / movement of human occupants in vehicles
US 5653462 A 144 MHz E Locate 21-Jul-95 5-Aug-97 David S. Breed, Vittorio Castelli, Wendell C. Johnson, William E. Duvall, Rashik Mangubhai Patel Automotive Technologies International Inc Monitors occupant position in vehicles via ultrasonic/microwave sensor
US 8362884 B2 Battery 16-Feb-11 29-Jan-13 Robert T. DugeRolls-Royce North American Technologies, Inc Power system. Maintains directed energy weapons in ready state (avoiding power down)
US 20120104282 A1 Aim 29-May-09 3-May-12 James R. GallivanGallivan James R Target-tracking system for use with hand-held directed energy weapons.
US 20090193344 A1 NM 24-Jan-08 30-Jul-09 Scott Smyers Sony Corporation Method of monitoring community mood by remotely analyzing voice, text, and biometrics
US 20090257555 A1 Locate 10-Feb-09 15-Oct-09 Alex Chalmers, Louis W. Perich, Peter J. Rothschild, William John Baukus, Jeffrey Schubert American Science And Engineering, Inc. X-ray inspection trailer that can sense the presence of humans within a structure.
US 8194822 B2 Locate 28-Sep-10 5-Jun-12 Peter Rothschild, Jeffrey Schubert, Richard Schueller American Science And Engineering, Inc. X-ray inspection device that can sense the presence of humans within a structure.
US 5551879 A 1Hz-500Hz MK Dream alteration
US5954630 A 2Hz-20Hz V2K 16-Jun-05
US 5330414 A 4Hz-30Hz MK 13-Jun-05
US 3951134 A 10MHz – 210MHz E MK 27-May-05
EP 2113063 A1 95GHz 1-Jul-05 Affects tissues to depth of 0.5mm: blood vessels, nerves, glands
3.5Hz – 3kHz V2K
Helpful Patents for Targets
USP # 6,430,443 august, 2002 helps to eliminate auditory hallucinations
USP 5562597 1-Oct-96 uses electrical stimulation of a crystal and it’s supposed to reduce stress
US 7297100 B2 Device for magnetic and electric field shielding WO 1995005128 A1 Protection of living systems from electromagnetic fields
US 20140039821 A1 Methods of scanning, analyzing and identifying electromagnetic field sources
USP # 6,430,443 august, 2002 helps to eliminate auditory hallucinations
USP 5562597 1-Oct-96 uses electrical stimulation of a crystal and it’s supposed to reduce stress
US 7297100 B2 Device for magnetic and electric field shielding WO 1995005128 A1 Protection of living systems from electromagnetic fields
US 20140039821 A1 Methods of scanning, analyzing and identifying electromagnetic field sources
V. Mind Control/Directed Energy Weapon/Targeted Individual Patents (in English) (figure by Marco Mayo)
B. Directed Energy Weapon/Targeted Individual Patents (in Spanish) (figure by Marco Mayo)
C. Directed Energy Weapon/Targeted Individual Patent (1998) original graph pdf
VI. Mind Control Patents and Diagrams
VII. (Bill Gates’ Total Enslavement Patent) 060606 – Cryptocurrency System Using Body Activity Data (& videos); Plus H.R. 666 (Anti-Racism in Public Health Act) & H.R. 6666 (COVID-19 Testing, Reaching, And Contacting Everyone (TRACE) Act)
“No one will enter the New World Order unless he or she will make a pledge to worship Lucifer. No one will enter the New Age unless they will take a Luciferian initiation.”
David Spangler, Director of Planetary Initiative, United Nations From: “Reflections on the Christ,” 1978/em>
I. Webmaster’s Comment: Horrifying! This patent proves that the weapons systems technologies that have been tested and deployed against “targeted individuals” over the past 7 decades are now going to be rolled out on the larger population to completely surveille and control human beings. In effect anyone targeted can be remotely tortured, terrorized, and/or killed with these technologies. The fact that crypto-currency technologies are combined with these electronic control systems indicates that the plan is for humans to be converted to bio-robotized slaves, that is, cyborgs.
The technologies identified in this patent (especially those in emboldened letters below) comprise weapons systems that have been developed in top-secret black projects by government military-intelligence and the corporate sector over the past 70 years. US taxpayers paid for these technologies and many millions of innocent civilians have been and are still secretly being used as nonconsensual human experimentees in these programs. Now the US government has apparently now gifted these technologies and weapons systems to Microsoft.
Clearly the Covid-19 Plandemic is simply the current pretext for rolling these invasive technologies out against the civilian population.
The following video includes an informed discussion regarding the implications of this patent.
“ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE PLAN” THAT BECAME “CORONAVIRUS PLAN” & “CHINA DID IT” NARRATIVE IS WMDS 2.0
(The Last American Vagabond video with Whitney Webb, April 22, 2020)
1. WO2020060606 – CRYPTOCURRENCY SYSTEM USING BODY ACTIVITY DATA
Publication Number WO/2020/060606 Publication Date
International Application No.
International Filing Date
MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC [US/US]; One Microsoft Way Redmond, Washington 98052-6399, US
ABRAMSON, Dustin; US
FU, Derrick; US
JOHNSON, Joseph Edwin, JR.; US Agents
MINHAS, Sandip S.; US
CHEN, Wei-Chen Nicholas; US
HINOJOSA, Brianna L.; US
HOLMES, Danielle J.; US
SWAIN, Cassandra T.; US
WONG, Thomas S.; US
CHOI, Daniel; US
HWANG, William C.; US
WIGHT, Stephen A.; US
CHATTERJEE, Aaron C.; US
JARDINE, John S.; US
GOLDSMITH, Micah P.; US
TRAN, Kimberly; US
PEREZ, Edgar; US
16/138,518 21.09.2018 US
(EN) CRYPTOCURRENCY SYSTEM USING BODY ACTIVITY DATA
(FR) SYSTÈME DE CRYPTOMONNAIE UTILISANT DES DONNÉES D’ACTIVITÉ CORPORELLE
Human body activity associated with a task provided to a user may be used in a mining process of a cryptocurrency system. A server may provide a task to a device of a user which is communicatively coupled to the server. A sensor communicatively coupled to or comprised in the device of the user may sense body activity of the user. Body activity data may be generated based on the sensed body activity of the user. The cryptocurrency system communicatively coupled to the device of the user may verify if the body activity data satisfies one or more conditions set by the cryptocurrency system, and award cryptocurrency to the user whose body activity data is verified.
L’activité du corps humain associée à une tâche fournie à un utilisateur peut être utilisée dans un processus de minage d’un système de cryptomonnaie. Un serveur peut fournir une tâche à un dispositif d’un utilisateur qui est couplé de manière à communiquer avec le serveur. Un capteur couplé de manière à communiquer avec un dispositif de l’utilisateur ou compris dans ce dernier peut détecter l’activité corporelle de l’utilisateur. Des données d’activité corporelle peuvent être générées sur la base de l’activité corporelle détectée de l’utilisateur. Le système de cryptomonnaie de la présente invention couplé de manière à communiquer avec le dispositif de l’utilisateur peut vérifier si les données d’activité corporelle satisfont une ou plusieurs conditions définies par le système de cryptomonnaie, et attribuer une cryptomonnaie à l’utilisateur dont les données d’activité corporelle sont vérifiées.
Also published as
Latest bibliographic data on file with the International Bureau
Note: Text based on automatic Optical Character Recognition processes. Please use the PDF version for legal matters
CRYPTOCURRENCY SYSTEM USING BODY ACTIVITY DATA
BACKGROUND A virtual currency (also known as a digital currency) is a medium of exchange implemented through the Internet generally, not tied to a specific government-backed “flat” (printed) currency such as the U.S. dollar or the Euro, and typically designed to allow instantaneous transactions and borderless transfer of ownership. One example of virtual currency is cryptocurrency, wherein cryptography is used to secure transactions and to control the creation of new units.  Several cryptocurrencies exist. Among these, the most well known is a blockchain-based cryptocurrency. Most blockchain-based cryptocurrency is decentralized in the sense that it has no central point of control. However, blockchain-based cryptocurrency can also be implemented in a centralized system having a central point of control over the cryptocurrency. Bitcoin is one of the examples of blockchain-based cryptocurrency. It is described in a 2008 article by Satoshi Nakamoto, named“Bitcoin: A peer-to-Peer
Electronic Cash System”. A blockchain is a data structure that stores a list of transactions and can be thought of as a distributed electronic ledger that records transactions between source identifier(s) and destination identifier(s). The transactions are bundled into blocks and every block (except for the first block) refers back to or is linked to a prior block in the blockchain. Computer resources (or nodes, etc.) maintain the blockchain and cryptographically validate each new block and the transactions contained in the corresponding block. This validation process includes computationally solving a difficult problem that is also easy to verify and is sometimes called a“proof-of-work”. This process is referred to as“mining”. The mining may be a random process with low probability so that a lot of trial and error is required to solve a computationally difficult problem. Accordingly, the mining may require enormous amounts of computational energy.  It is with respect to these and other general considerations that the following embodiments have been described. Also, although relatively specific problems have been discussed, it should be understood that the embodiments should not be limited to solving the specific problems identified in the background.
SUMMARY Some exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure may use human body activity associated with a task provided to a user as a solution to“mining” challenges in cryptocurrency systems. For example, a brain wave or body heat emitted from the user when the user performs the task provided by an information or service provider, such as viewing advertisement or using certain internet services, can be used in the mining process. Instead of massive computation work required by some conventional cryptocurrency systems, data generated based on the body activity of the user can be a proof-of-work, and therefore, a user can solve the computationally difficult problem unconsciously. Accordingly, certain exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure may reduce computational energy for the mining process as well as make the mining process faster.  Systems, methods, and hardware aspects of computer readable storage media are provided herein for a cryptocurrency system using human body activity data. According to various embodiments of the present disclosure, a server may provide a task to a device of a user which is communicatively coupled to the server. A sensor communicatively coupled to or comprised in the device of the user may sense body activity of the user. Body activity data may be generated based on the sensed body activity of the user. A cryptocurrency system communicatively coupled to the device of the user may verify whether or not the body activity data satisfies one or more conditions set by the cryptocurrency system, and award cryptocurrency to the user whose body activity data is verified.  Examples are implemented as a computer process, a computing system, or as an article of manufacture such as a device, computer program product, or computer readable medium. According to one aspect, the computer program product is a computer storage medium readable by a computer system and encoding a computer program comprising instructions for executing a computer process.  This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used to limit the scope of the claimed subject matter.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Various embodiments in accordance with the present disclosure will be described with reference to the drawings, in which:  FIG. 1 illustrates an example environment in which some exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure may be practiced;  FIG. 2 shows a system diagram of a decentralized cryptocurrency system according
to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure; FIG. 3 shows a flow diagram of a computer-implemented method according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;  FIG. 4 shows a flow diagram of an operation for generating body activity data according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;  FIG. 5 shows a flow diagram of an operation for verifying body activity data according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;  FIG. 6 illustrates a blockchain and two exemplary blocks of the blockchain according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;  FIG. 7 shows a flow diagram of a computer-implemented method using a vector or embedding according to another exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure; and  FIG. 8 illustrates an exemplary block diagram of a computer or processing system in which processes involved in the system, method, and computer program product described herein may be implemented.  Corresponding numerals and symbols in the different figures generally refer to corresponding parts unless otherwise indicated. The figures are drawn to clearly illustrate the relevant aspects of the embodiments and are not necessarily drawn to scale.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS In the following detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof, and in which are shown by way of illustration specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, and it is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that structural, logical and electrical changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. The following detailed description is therefore not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the invention is defined only by the appended claims and equivalents thereof. Like numbers in the figures refer to like components, which should be apparent from the context of use.  The term“cryptocurrency” may mean a digital currency in which encryption techniques are used to regulate the generation of units of currency and verify the transfer of funds. Many cryptocurrencies include the use of a blockchain to provide security and prevent fraud as double spending. Some embodiments of the present disclosure may be used in alternate cryptocurrency mechanisms other than a blockchain. The system, method, and computer program products described herein may be applied to both centralized and decentralized cryptocurrency networks or databases.  FIG. 1 illustrates an example environment 100 in which some exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure may be practiced. The example environment 100 includes, but is not limited to, at least one of task server 110, communication network 120, user device 130, sensor 140, and cryptocurrency system 150.  Task server 110 may provide one or more tasks to user device 130 over communication network 120. For example, task server 110 may be at least one of a web server delivering or serving up web pages, an application server handling application operations between users and applications or databases, a cloud server, a database server, a file server, a service server, a game server implementing games or services for a game, and a media server delivering media such as streaming video or audio. The tasks provided by task server 110 will be discussed in more detail below.  Alternatively, cryptocurrency system 150 may provide one or more tasks to user device 130. For example, in a decentralized cryptocurrency network, the tasks may be proposed to user device 130 by miners (e.g. compute resources or nodes 210 of FIG. 2). In another example, in a centralized cryptocurrency system, a cryptocurrency server may send the tasks to user device 130.  Communication network 120 may include any wired or wireless connection, the internet, or any other form of communication. Although one network 120 is identified in FIG. 1, communication network 120 may include any number of different communication networks between any of the server, devices, resource and system shown in FIGS. 1 and 2 and/or other servers, devices, resources and systems described herein. Communication network 120 may enable communication between various computing resources or devices, servers, and systems. Various implementations of communication network 120 may employ different types of networks, for example, but not limited to, computer networks, telecommunications networks (e.g., cellular), mobile wireless data networks, and any combination of these and/or other networks.  User device 130 may include any device capable of processing and storing data/information and communicating over communication network 120. For example, user device 130 may include personal computers, servers, cell phones, tablets, laptops, smart devices (e.g. smart watches or smart televisions). An exemplary embodiment of user device 130 is illustrated in FIG. 6.  Sensor 140 may be configured to sense the body activity of user 145. As illustrated in FIG. 1, sensor 140 may be a separate component from user device 130 and be operably and/or communicatively connected to user device 130. Alternatively, sensor 140 may be included and integrated in user device 130. For example, user device 130 may be a wearable device having sensor 140 therein. The sensor 140 may transmit information/data to user device 130. Sensor 140 may include, for example, but not limited to, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scanners or sensors, electroencephalography (EEG) sensors, near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) sensors, heart rate monitors, thermal sensors, optical sensors, radio frequency (RF) sensors, ultrasonic sensors, cameras, or any other sensor or scanner that can measure or sense body activity or scan human body. For instance, the fMRI may measure body activity by detecting changes associated with blood flow. The fMRI may use a magnetic field and radio waves to create detailed images of the body (e.g. blood flow in the brain to detect areas of activity). The material (http://news.berkely.edu/20l l/09/22/brain-movies/) shows one example of how the fMRI can measure brain activity associated with visual information and generate image data.  Cryptocurrency system 150 may include one or more processors for processing commands and one or more memories storing information in one or more cryptocurrency data structures. In some embodiments, cryptocurrency system 150 may be a centralized cryptocurrency system or network, for example, but not limited to, a server which may be privately run by a third party entity or the same entity that is running the task server 110. In other embodiments, cryptocurrency system 150 may be a publically accessible network system (e.g., a distributed decentralized computing system).  For example, cryptocurrency system 150 may be a decentralized network 200, such as a decentralized blockchain network, including one or more compute resources 210, as shown, for example, in FIG. 2. In the embodiment of FIG. 2, there may be no central authority controlling cryptocurrency network 200. The data stored on blockchain network 200, i.e., the public ledger, may not be stored at a central location in its entirety. Blockchain network 200 may include a plurality of processors for processing commands and a plurality of memories storing information in one or more blockchain data structures. Blockchain network 200 may maintain one or more blockchains of continuously growing lists of data blocks, where each data block refers to previous blocks on its list. The requirement for each block to refer to all previous blocks in the blockchain, yields a chain of blocks that is hardened against tampering and revision, such that the information stored in the blockchain is immutable.  Compute resources 210 may include any device, computer, system or otherwise that has joined blockchain network 200 and forms a node in blockchain network 200. Compute
resources 210 may include, for example, but not limited to, personal computers, servers, cell phones, tablets, laptops, smart devices (e.g. smart watches or smart televisions), or any other device capable of storing information and communicating over communication network 120. In some embodiments, compute resources 210 may be unaffiliated with or unknown to each other where, for example, compute resources 210 remain anonymous. Each compute resource 210 may include memory 220 that stores a copy of at least a portion of public ledger 230 of blockchain network 200. Compute resources 210 may also execute one or more programs to perform various functions associated with maintaining blockchain network 200 including, for example, updating public ledger 230, generating new blocks, or any other similar function.  For illustration purposes, FIG. 1 illustrates user device 130 as not included in blockchain network 200. However, user device 130 may be part of blockchain network 200 and be implemented as one of the compute resources 210 in FIG. 2.  Public ledger 230 may store any transactions performed over blockchain network 200 including but not limited to, for example, any transaction related to and occurring on blockchain network 200. Because each compute resource 210 stores a copy of at least a portion of the public ledger 230 of blockchain network 200, public ledger 230 may be independently verified for accuracy at any time by comparing the stored copies of multiple compute resources 210.  Communication between compute resources 210 may occur via communication network 120. Communication network 120 of FIG. 2 may be the same network as, or be a different network from, communication 120 of FIG. 1. In some embodiments, each compute resource 210 may communicate directly with each other compute resource 210. In some embodiments, some compute resources 210 may not be able to communicate directly with each other. For example, they are not connected to the same communications network 120. In this case, communications related to blockchain network 200 between the compute resources 210 may occur by using one or more of the remaining compute resources 210 as an intermediary. In some embodiments, one or more of compute resources 210 may not maintain a continuous connection to blockchain network 200 at all times. For example, a compute resource 210 may only be connected to blockchain network 200 during a certain period of time each day or may only be connected to blockchain network 200 intermittently throughout the day. Due to the decentralized nature of blockchain network 200, such an intermittent connection by one or more compute resources 210 does not affect the overall operation of blockchain network 200 since copies of public ledger 230 are stored on multiple compute resources 210. Once the disconnected compute resource 210 reconnects to blockchain network 200, the disconnected compute resource 210 may receive updated copies of the public ledger 210 from one or more of the compute resources 210 that have been connected to blockchain network 200.  FIG. 3 shows a flow diagram of a computer-implemented method according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure.  Method 300 begins at operation 310 illustrated in FIG. 3, where task server 110 provides one or more tasks to device 130 of user 145 over communication network 120. The tasks include, for example, but not limited to, watching or listening information (e g. advertisement) for a certain time, using services (e.g. search engine, chat bot, e-mail, social media/networking service and any internet or web service), uploading or sending information/data to a website, a server or a network (e.g. content sharing website, and cloud network or server), or any other information or service which may produce effects on users. In the blockchain, the task(s) may be included as a transaction in the public ledger 230.  Furthermore, the task(s) provided by task server 110 can include solving a test for distinguishing human from machine input so that humans but not computers are able to pass it, such as, Computer Automated Program to Tell Computers and Flumans Apart (CAPTCHA) and reCAPTCHA which is a CAPTCHA-like system designed to establish that a computer user is human. The task may require user 145 to solve a verification challenge, for example, but not limited to, an image based challenge including instructions prompting user 145 to solve the challenge through interaction with one or more images.  At operation 320, when or after user 145 performs the task(s) provided by task server 110, sensor 140 may sense the body activity of user 145 that is a body response related to the task provided by task server 110, and then transmit the sensed body activity of user 145 to user device 130. The body activity may include, for example, but not limited to, radiation emitted from human body, brain activities, body fluid flow (e.g. blood flow), organ activity or movement, body movement, and any other activities that can be sensed and represented by images, waves, signals, texts, numbers, degrees, or any other form of information or data. Examples of body radiation emitted from human body may include radiant heat of the body, pulse rate, or brain wave. Brain waves may comprise, for example, but not limited to, (i) gamma waves, involved in learning or memory tasks, (ii) beta waves, involved in logical thinking and/or conscious thought, (iii) alpha waves, which may be related to subconscious thoughts, (iv) theta waves, which may be related to thoughts involving deep and raw emotions, (v) delta waves, which may be involved in sleep or deep relaxation, or (vi)
electroencephalogram (EEG), which may be measurement used to evaluate the electrical activity in the brain, such as deep concentration. Examples of the body movement may include eye movement, facial movement or any other muscular movements. Furthermore, brain activity can be sensed using the fMRI. The fMRI measures brain activity by detecting changes associated with blood flow. This technique relies on the fact that cerebral blood flow and neuronal activation are coupled. When an area of the brain is in use, blood flow to that region also increases.  At operation 330, user device 130 generates body activity data based on the body activity sensed by sensor 140. Operation 330 may be part of a mining process which is a process for solving a computationally difficult problem. One exemplary embodiment of operation 330 is shown in FIG. 4. As shown in FIG. 4, operation 330 may comprise operations 410 and 420.  At operation 410, the body activity sensed by sensor 140 may be codified in symbolic forms, such as letter(s), numeral(s), symbol(s), and a string comprising sequence of characters. In one example, the body activity can be codified by extracting one or more values from the sensed body activity, such as minimum and/or maximum amplitude(s) or frequency(ies) of a body activity signal (e g. brain waves). In another example, user device 130 may window and sample the sensed body activity over time and calculate the average of the sampled values. In still another example, user device 130 may generate raw data of the body activity. In still another example, user device 130 may filter a raw signal of the body activity using one or more filters to apply the filtered body activity signal to an audio hash function or algorithm at operation 420. Alternatively, any statistic value(s) associated with human body activity can be codified from the body activity sensed by sensor 140.  At operation 420, the codified body activity may be converted into an encrypted output by using an encryption algorithm, such as a hash algorithm or function. For example, hash functions include functions that map an initial input data set of an output data set. Generally, the hash function may be any function that can be used to map data of arbitrary size to data of fixed size. The hash function allows one to easily verify that some input data maps to a given hash value, but if the input data is unknown, it is deliberately difficult to reconstruct it (or any equivalent alternatives) by knowing the stored hash value. The hash algorithm or function may be included in the mining software or program of the cryptocurrency system or database.  For example, operation 420 may use audio hash function, where the histogram of frequencies of the codified body activity are summed up, or bit manipulation, such as XOR function of each histogram bucket with the next or a modulus of a prime number, is performed on the codified body activity.  In some embodiments, an analog hash function where the body activities themselves are hashes can be used. For example, waves or signals sensed by sensor 140, for example, but not limited to, alpha, beta, delta or gamma waves from the EEG sensor, may be transformed to a histogram using a transforming algorithm or formula, such as Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) or any other algorithm or formula that can convolve, add or multiply waves or signals to produce a histogram. The hash may be the histogram itself. For example, the hash may be the output of the FFT where each component is a frequency band and the value is counts corresponding to each frequency band. In another example, the desired properties may be that the first two frequency histograms are as close to zero as possible, for instance, provided some statistical guarantee exists that this cannot happen easily.  However, operation 420 is optional. In certain embodiments, user device 130, without encrypting or hashing the codified body activity, may transmit the codified body activity generated at operation 410 to cryptocurrency system 150.  Although FIG. 3 illustrates that operation 330, including operation 410 and 420, is processed by user device 130, at least one of operations 410 and 420 can be processed by another device(s), server, resource or system, such as task server 110, cryptocurrency system 150 or any other server. For example, the user device 130 may generate raw data of the sensed body activity, transmit it to cryptocurrency system 150, task server 110 or any other server, and then cryptocurrency system 150, task server 110 or any other server may codify or hash the raw data of the sensed body activity.  Referring back to FIG. 3, at operation 340, cryptocurrency system 150 verifies if the body activity data of user 145 generated by user device 130 satisfies one or more conditions set by an algorithm of cryptocurrency system 150. The conditions may be set by simulating human body activity across all of body activities that can constitute hashes. Machine learning algorithms may be used to simulate body activities and set the conditions for valid body activities, for example, but not limited to, using generative adversarial networks.  In some embodiments, cryptocurrency system 150 verifies whether the body activity data of user 145 (e.g. the code of the body activity generated at operation 410 or the hash of the body activity generated at operation 420) may represent that the body activity of user 145 is within a target range. The target range may be determined using the amount of cognitive effort that user 145 requires to perform the task provided by task server 110. For example, to verify if the hash of the body activity of user 145, cryptocurrency system 150 may determine, for example, but not limited to, (i) whether the hash of the body activity of user 145 has a specific certain pattern, repeated patterns, a mathematical properties or the number of leading numbers, characters or strings (e.g. leading zeroes) set by cryptocurrency system 150, or (ii) whether the hash of the body activity of user 145 is less than a current target value. Examples of the numerical patterns set by cryptocurrency system 150 may be a pattern that first certain digits of the hash form a prime number, or a pattern that a number that is calculated by applying first certain digits of the hash to a preset formula forms a prime number (For example, a number calculated by adding or subtracting a predetermined number or a number set by cryptocurrency system 150 to the first four digits of the hashing forms a prime number). The repeating number patterns may include a repeating number (e.g. leading zeros, ones in the middle of the hash, twos in the last four digits of the hash, and any repeating numbers included in the hash) and a repeating number sequence (e.g. leading repeating digit pairs, such as“121212”, or triplets“123123”). If the hash of the body activity of user 145 has the desirable pattern(s) or is within the target range, then the proof of work or proof of stake is considered solved, and that hash can be a new block. The target range or value may be changed periodically to maintain a preselected level of difficulty, although it is not required. For example, the target value may be inversely proportional to the difficulty. By varying the difficulty, a roughly constant rate of block generation may be kept.  The target range of valid body activity may be set using statistical data so that normal body activity, activity that can easily happen, or faking body activity cannot be validated. For example, the target range of valid body activity may be selected from a range that human miners cannot fake their own body activity to satisfy the target range to prove and validate the proof-of-work.  Additionally, the verification at operation 340 may include filtering out invalid tasks, malformed data (syntax errors) or data sent from an unauthorized user or generated by a machine learning system. For example, cryptocurrency system 150 may receive, from user device 130, data of the body activity generated before the hash algorithm is applied, rehash that data, and then compare the rehashed data with the hash received from user device 130 to check whether the body activity data is generated based on human, not random computer generated data. Voxel(s) of the image of the fMRI may be an example of the data of the body activity generated before the hash algorithm is applied.  One exemplary embodiment of operation 340 is shown in FIG. 5. At operation 510, cryptocurrency system 150 may check whether the hash of the body activity, received from user device 130, is within the target range set by cryptocurrency system 150, or comprises a desirable pattern set by cryptocurrency system 150. If the hash of the body activity is within the target range or has a desirable pattern set by cryptocurrency system 150, cryptocurrency system 150 rehashes data of the body activity, generated before the hash algorithm is applied and transmitted with the hash of the body activity from user device 130 (Operation 520), and then compare the rehashed data with the hash of the body activity, received from user device 130 (Operation 530). If the rehashed data is identical to the hash of the body activity, received from user device 130, cryptocurrency system 150 proceeds to operation 350. However, if determining in operation 510 that the hash of the body activity data is out of the target range or does not include the desirable pattern set by cryptocurrency system 150 or if determining in operation 530 that the rehashed data does not match the hash of the body activity, operation 310 or 320 may be proceeded.  At operation 350, when the body activity data transmitted from user device 130 satisfies one or more conditions set by cryptocurrency system 150, cryptocurrency system 150 awards cryptocurrency to user 145. For example, cryptocurrency system 150 awards to user 145 an amount of cryptocurrency corresponding to the task accomplished by user 145. Additionally, cryptocurrency system 150 may award cryptocurrency to an owner or operator of task server 110 as a reward for providing services, such as, search engines, chatbots, applications or websites, offering users access for free to paid contents (e.g. video and audio streaming or electric books), or sharing information or data with users.  For example, in the blockchain cryptocurrency system, at operation 340, at least one of compute resources 210 of FIG. 2 verifies if the hash of the body activity data of user 145 is valid. At operation 350, when the hash of the body activity data of user 145 is validated at operation 340, the compute resource 210 of FIG. 2 can add a new block to the blockchain. The new block may contain the number of cryptocurrency units assigned to the user’s address. The new blockchain with the additional added block is broadcasted around the cryptocurrency network 150. The compute resource 210, which performed operations 340 and 350, may be also rewarded with transaction fees and/or cryptocurrency.  FIG. 5 depicts a blockchain 500 and two exemplary blocks 510, 520 of blockchain 500 according to exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure. Typically a “blockchain” is understood as being a data structure comprising a series of blocks, where each block includes data corresponding to one or more transactions, hashed together with linking data, such as the hash of an immediately preceding block. In the embodiment of the present disclosure, the transaction may be the task performed by user 145. The chain can
then be used to create a ledger, which is typically an append-only database. Once data is entered into a block of the chain, the entry is essentially irrefutable, since any tampering with the data would be reflected in the chained hash calculations and is thus easily detected. The blockchain 500 may represent the publicly distributable transactions ledger, such as ledger 230 of FIG. 2, and may include a plurality of blocks. Each block, such as block 510 and block 520 may include data regarding recent transactions. For example, the task performed by user 145 and the number of cryptocurrency units awarded to user 145, and/or contents linking data that links one block 520 to a previous block 510, and proof-of-work data, for example, the validated hash of the body activity, that ensures that the state of the blockchain 500 is valid and is endorsed/verified by a majority of the record keeping system. Exemplary embodiments of block 520 of blockchain 500 may include a current hash, a previous hash of previous block 510, transaction. The previous hash is a hash from the immediately preceding block, which ensures that each block is immutably tied to previous block. The hash of previous block 510 may be included in block 520, thereby linking block 520 to previous block 510.  Transaction information cannot be modified without at least one of compute resources 210 noticing, thus, the blockchain 500 can be trusted to verify transactions occurring on blockchain 500.  In some embodiments, vectors or embeddings may be used for body activity data. FIG. 7 shows a flow diagram of an exemplary embodiment of a computer-implemented method using vectors (or embedding). As described in detail above with respect to FIG. 3, task server 110 or cryptocurrency system/network 150, such as a central cryptocurrency server or compute resource (or node) 210, may perform operation 310 where one or more tasks are proposed to user device 130 over communication network 120, and sensor 140 may perform operation 320 where sensor 140 senses or measures the body activity of user 145. Sensor 140 (or user device 130) may generate data of the body activity in the form of images, waves, signals, numbers, characters, strings or any other form that can represent the body activity.  At operation 710, user device 130 produces one or more vectors (or embeddings), such as an array of floating point numbers, from the data of the body activity generated by sensor 140 (or user device 130). An algorithm stored in user device 130, or any device, server, system or network communicatively connected to user device 130 over communication network 120, may transform the data of the body activity generated by sensor 140 (or user device 130) into one or more vectors. For example, the brain image generated by the fMRI scanner may be fed into a computer vision machine learning algorithm, for example, but limited to, a convolution neural network, and the machine learning algorithm may generate one or more vectors from one or more voxels of the brain image. In some embodiments, one single vector may be generated at operation 710. In other embodiments, a series of vectors may be produced by sampling over time when user 145 is performing the task(s). The data of the body activity (e.g. voxels of a brain image) and/or the vectors (or embeddings) may generate a“proof of work” and be transmitted to cryptocurrency system/network 150.  In addition, the vectors may optionally include one or more vectors related to the task(s), for example, but not limited to, search terms that user 145 used or identified s) of advertisement that user 145 viewed.  At operation 720, the vector(s) generated at operation 710 may be converted into an encrypted output by using an encryption algorithm, such as a hashing algorithm or function, as explained above with respect to operation 420 of FIG. 4. For example, the vector(s) can be hashed as bytes with the hashing algorithm, such as Secure Hash Algorithm (SHA)-l, SHA-256, SHA-384, SHA-512, and Message Digest (MD)-5.  However, operation 720 is optional. In some embodiments, user device 130 can transmit the vector(s) of the body activity produced at operation 710 to cryptocurrency system 150 without encrypting or hashing them.  At operation 730, cryptocurrency system 150 receives, from user device 130, the data of the body activity of user 145 (e.g. voxels of a brain image) and/or the vector(s) (or the hash) of the body activity of user 145.  At operation 740, cryptocurrency system 150 checks if the vector(s) received from user device 130 have one or more mathematical properties set by cryptocurrency system/network 150. For example, cryptocurrency system 150 may determine whether the vector(s) of the body activity have similarity (or relationship) with a legitimate vector (or a baseline vector) set by an algorithm of cryptocurrency system 150. The similarity may be measured or calculated using, for example, but not limited to, a cosine similarity, the Euclidean distance, the Manhattan distance, the Minkowski distance, and the Jaccard similarity. The legitimate vector may be set based on the assumption that the vectors of body activities of people who are performing the same task have a certain degree of similarity. Cryptocurrency system 150, such as a central cryptocurrency server/network or compute resource (or node) 210 of FIG. 2, can decide the legitimate vector and similarity. For example, miners like compute resources (or nodes) 210 of FIG. 2 can share their proof of work including, for example, but not limited to, vectors of body activities, with cryptocurrency network 150, and decide the legitimate vector and similarity by calculating the average of the proof of work (e g. a centroid or weighted average of the vectors and a standard deviation).  If the vector(s) received from user device 130 have the mathematical property(ies) set by cryptocurrency system/network 150, cryptocurrency system/network 150 rehashes the data of the body activity, transmitted from user device 130 (Operation 750), and then compares the rehashed output with the vectors (or the hash) received from user device 130 (Operation 760). For example, computer resource (or node) 210 of FIG. 2 may rehash the fMRI voxels, transmitted from user device 130, to a vector, and then compare the rehashed vector with the vector received from user device 130 to check whether the body activity data is generated based on human, not random computer generated data. If determining in operation 740 that the vector(s) received user device 130 do not satisfy the mathematical property(ies) set by cryptocurrency system/network 150 or if determining in operation 760 that the rehashed output does not match the vector(s) (or the hash) received from user device 130, operation 310 or 320 may be proceeded.  If the rehashed output is identical to the vector(s) (or the hash) received from user device 130, cryptocurrency system/network 150 awards cryptocurrency to user 145 as described in detail above with respect to operation 350. For example, in the blockchain cryptocurrency system, a miner, such as one of compute resources (or nodes) 210 of FIG. 2, which performed the validation of the body activity data, may add a new block, which includes the data of the body activity, the vector(s) (or the hash) and/or the number of cryptocurrency units assigned to the user’s address, to the blockchain, broadcast a new blockchain with the new block around cryptocurrency network 150, and may be rewarded with transaction fees and/or cryptocurrency.  FIG. 8 illustrates a schematic of an example computer or processing system that may implement any of the systems, methods, and computer program products, such as task server 110, user device 130, cryptocurrency system 150 and compute resources 210, described herein in one embodiment of the present disclosure. The computer system is only one example of a suitable processing system and is not intended to suggest any limitation as to the scope of use or functionality of embodiments of the methodology described herein. The processing system shown may be operational with numerous other general purpose or special purpose computing system environments or configurations. Examples of well-known computing systems, environments, and/or configurations that may be suitable for use with the processing system shown in FIG. 8 may include, but are not limited to, personal computer systems, server computer systems, thin clients, thick clients, handheld or laptop devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based systems, set top boxes, programmable consumer electronics, network PCs, minicomputer systems, mainframe computer systems, and distributed cloud computing environments that include any of the above systems or devices, and the like.  The computer system may be described in the general context of computer system executable instructions, such as program modules, being executed by a computer system. Generally, program modules may include routines, programs, objects, components, logic, data structures, and so on that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. The computer system may be practiced in distributed cloud computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network. In a distributed cloud computing environment, program modules may be located in both local and remote computer system storage media including memory storage devices.  The components of computer system 800 may include, but are not limited to, one or more processors or processing units 810, system memory 820, and bus 830 that couples various system components including system memory 820 to processor 810. Processor 810 may include software module 815 that performs the methods described herein. The module 815 may be programmed into the integrated circuits of processor 810, or loaded from memory 820, storage device 840, or network 850 or combinations thereof.  Bus 830 may represent one or more of any of several types of bus structures, including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, an accelerated graphics port, and a processor or local bus using any of a variety of bus architectures. By way of example, and not limitation, such architectures include Industry Standard Architecture (ISA) bus, Micro Channel Architecture (MCA) bus, Enhanced ISA (EISA) bus, Video Electronics Standards Association (VESA) local bus, and Peripheral Component Interconnects (PCI) bus.  Computer system 800 may include a variety of computer system readable media. Such media may be any available media that is accessible by computer system, and it may include both volatile and non-volatile media, removable and non-removable media.  System memory 820 can include computer system readable media in the form of volatile memory, such as random access memory (RAM) and/or cache memory or others. Computer system 800 may further include other removable/non-removable volatile/non-
volatile computer system storage media. By way of example only, storage device 840 can be provided for reading from and writing to a non-removable, non-volatile magnetic media (e.g., a“hard drive”). Although not shown, a magnetic disk drive for reading from and writing to a removable, non-volatile magnetic disk (e g., a“floppy disk”), and an optical disk drive for reading from or writing to a removable, non-volatile optical disk such as a CD-ROM, DVD-ROM or other optical media can be provided. In such instances, each can be connected to bus 630 by one or more data media interfaces. Computer system 800 may also communicate with one or more external devices 860 such as a keyboard, a pointing device, a display 870, etc; one or more devices that enable a user to interact with computer system; and/or any devices (e.g., network card, modem, etc.) that enable computer system to communicate with one or more other computing devices. Such communication can occur via Input/Output (I/O) interfaces 880.  Still yet, computer system 800 can communicate with one or more networks 850 such as a local area network (LAN), a general wide area network (WAN), and/or a public network (e.g., the Internet) via network adapter 855. As depicted, network adapter 855 communicates with the other components of computer system via bus 830. It should be understood that although not shown, other hardware and/or software components could be used in conjunction with computer system. Examples include, but are not limited to: microcode, device drivers, redundant processing units, external disk drive arrays, RAID systems, tape drives, and data archival storage systems, etc.  As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art, aspects of the present disclosure may be embodied as a system, method or computer program product. Accordingly, aspects of the present disclosure may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment (including firmware, resident software, micro-code, etc.) or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects that may all generally be referred to herein as a“circuit,”“module” or“system.” Furthermore, aspects of the present disclosure may take the form of a computer program product embodied in one or more computer readable medium(s) having computer readable program code embodied thereon.  Any combination of one or more computer readable medium(s) may be utilized. The computer readable medium may be a computer readable signal medium or a computer readable storage medium. A computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but not limited to, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, or device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. More specific examples (a non-exhaustive list) of the computer readable storage medium would include
the following: a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. In the context of this document, a computer readable storage medium may be any tangible medium that can contain, or store a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. A computer readable signal medium may include a propagated data signal with computer readable program code embodied therein, for example, in baseband or as part of a carrier wave. Such a propagated signal may take any of a variety of forms, including, but not limited to, electro-magnetic, optical, or any suitable combination thereof. A computer readable signal medium may be any computer readable medium that is not a computer readable storage medium and that can communicate, propagate, or transport a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.  Program code embodied on a computer readable medium may be transmitted using any appropriate medium, including but not limited to wireless, wireline, optical fiber cable, RF, etc., or any suitable combination of the foregoing.  Computer program code for carrying out operations for aspects of the present invention may be written in any combination of one or more programming languages, including an object oriented programming language such as Java, Smalltalk, C++ or the like and conventional procedural programming languages, such as the“C” programming language or similar programming languages, a scripting language such as Perl, VBS or similar languages, and/or functional languages such as Lisp and ML and logic-oriented languages such as Prolog. The program code may execute entirely on the user’s computer, partly on the user’s computer, as a stand-alone software package, partly on the user’s computer and partly on a remote computer or entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latter scenario, the remote computer may be connected to the user’s computer through any type of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer (for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider).  Aspects of the present disclosure are described with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems) and computer program products according to some embodiments of the present disclosure. It will be understood that each block of the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.  These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer readable medium that can direct a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer readable medium produce an article of manufacture including instructions which implement the function/act specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.  The computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer, other programmable apparatus or other devices to produce a computer implemented process such that the instructions which execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus provide processes for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.  The flowchart and block diagrams in the figures illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of systems, methods and computer program products according to various embodiments of the present invention. In this regard, each block in the flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of code, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function(s). It should also be noted that, in some alternative implementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-based systems that perform the specified functions or acts, or combinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions.  The computer program product may comprise all the respective features enabling the implementation of the methodology described herein, and which – when loaded in a
computer system – is able to carry out the methods. Computer program, software program, program, or software, in the present context means any expression, in any language, code or notation, of a set of instructions intended to cause a system having an information processing capability to perform a particular function either directly or after either or both of the following: (a) conversion to another language, code or notation; and/or (b) reproduction in a different material form. The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used herein, the singular forms “a”,“an” and“the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms“comprises” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.  The corresponding structures, materials, acts, and equivalents of all means or step plus function elements, if any, in the claims below are intended to include any structure, material, or act for performing the function in combination with other claimed elements as specifically claimed. The description of the present invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description, but is not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the invention in the form disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. The embodiment was chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and the practical application, and to enable others of ordinary skill in the art to understand the invention for various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.  Various aspects of the present disclosure may be embodied as a program, software, or computer instructions embodied in a computer or machine usable or readable medium, which causes the computer or machine to perform the steps of the method when executed on the computer, processor, and/or machine. A program storage device readable by a machine, tangibly embodying a program of instructions executable by the machine to perform various functionalities and methods described in the present disclosure is also provided.  The system and method of the present disclosure may be implemented and run on a general-purpose computer or special-purpose computer system. The terms“computer
system” and“computer network” as may be used in the present application may include a variety of combinations of fixed and/or portable computer hardware, software, peripherals, and storage devices. The computer system may include a plurality of individual components that are networked or otherwise linked to perform collaboratively, or may include one or more stand-alone components. The hardware and software components of the computer system of the present application may include and may be included within fixed and portable devices such as desktop, laptop, and/or server. A module may be a component of a device, software, program, or system that implements some“functionality”, which can be embodied as software, hardware, firmware, electronic circuitry, or etc. Although specific embodiments of the present invention have been described, it will be understood by those of skill in the art that there are other embodiments that are equivalent to the described embodiments. Accordingly, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited by the specific illustrated embodiments, but only by the scope of the appended claims.
CONCEPTS Concept 1. A cryptocurrency system, comprising: one or more processors; and memory storing executable instructions that, if executed by the one or more processors, configure the cryptocurrency system to: communicate with a device of a user; receive body activity data which is generated based on body activity of the user, wherein the body activity is sensed by a sensor communicatively coupled to or comprised in the device of the user; verify if the body activity data of the user satisfies one or more conditions set by the cryptocurrency system; and award cryptocurrency to the user whose body activity data is verified.  Concept 2. The system of any preceding and/or succeeding Concept(s), wherein the body activity sensed by the sensor comprises at least one of body radiation emitted from the user, body fluid flow, a brain wave, pulse rate or body heat radiation.  Concept 3. The system of any preceding and/or succeeding Concept(s), wherein the one or more conditions are set based on an amount of human body activity associated with a task which is provided to the device of the user.  Concept 4. The system of any preceding and/or succeeding Concept, wherein the one or more conditions comprise a condition that the body activity data represents that the user performs a task provided to the device of the user.  Concept 5. The system of any preceding and/or succeeding Concept(s), wherein the body activity data is generated using a hash algorithm converting human body activity into an encryption output, and the generated body activity data comprises a hash of the sensed body activity of the user.  Concept 6. The system of any preceding and/or succeeding Concept(s), wherein the body activity data comprises one or more vectors produced from the body activity sensed by the sensor.  Concept 7. The system of any preceding and/or succeeding Concept(s), wherein the one or more conditions include a condition that the hash of the body activity includes repeated patterns or a mathematical property set by the cryptocurrency system.  Concept 8. The system of any preceding and/or succeeding Concept(s), wherein the cryptocurrency system awards the cryptocurrency to the user by generating a block for the awarded cryptocurrency and adding the block to a blockchain stored in the cryptocurrency system.  Concept 9. The system of any preceding and/or succeeding Concept(s), wherein the block comprises data comprising: a task provided to the device of the user; information on the awarded cryptocurrency; a hash associated with the body activity; and a hash of a previous block.  Concept 10. The system of any preceding and/or succeeding Concept(s), wherein the task provided to the device of the user comprises a test for verifying if the user of the device is human or not.  Concept 11. The system of any preceding and/or succeeding Concept(s), wherein the cryptocurrency system is configured to: receive, from the device of the user, data of the body activity generated before the hash algorithm is applied and the hash of the body activity; rehash the data of the body activity; and compare the rehashed data with the hash of the body activity received from the device of the user to verify the body activity data.  Concept 12. A computer-implemented method, comprising: receiving, by a device of a user coupled to a network, a task over the network; sensing, by a sensor communicatively coupled to or comprised in the device of the user, body activity of the user; generating body activity data based on the sensed body activity of the user; verifying, by a cryptocurrency system communicatively coupled to the device of the user, if the body activity data satisfies one or more conditions set by the cryptocurrency system; and awarding, by the cryptocurrency system, cryptocurrency to the user whose body activity data is verified.  Concept 13. The method of any preceding and/or succeeding Concept(s), wherein the body activity sensed by the sensor comprises at least one of body radiation emitted from the user, body fluid flow, a brain wave, pulse rate or body heat radiation.  Concept 14. The method of any preceding and/or succeeding Concept(s), wherein the one or more conditions are set by the cryptocurrency system based on an amount of human body activity associated with the task provided to the device of the user.  Concept 15. The method of any preceding and/or succeeding Concept(s), wherein the verifying if the body activity data satisfies the one or more conditions comprises determining if the body activity data represents that the user performs the task provided to the device of the user.  Concept 16. The method of any preceding and/or succeeding Concept(s), wherein the verifying if the body activity data satisfies the one or more conditions comprises determining if the body activity data represents more than an amount of the body activity set by the cryptocurrency system.  Concept 17. The method of any preceding and/or succeeding Concept(s), wherein the body activity data is generated using a hash algorithm converting human body activity into an encryption output, and the generated body activity data comprises a hash of the sensed body activity of the user.  Concept 18. The method of any preceding and/or succeeding Concept(s), wherein the body activity data comprises one or more vectors produced from the body activity sensed by the sensor.  Concept 19. The method of any preceding and/or succeeding Concept(s), wherein the verifying if the body activity data satisfies the one or more conditions set by the cryptocurrency system comprises determining if the hash of the sensed body activity includes repeated patterns or a mathematical property set by the cryptocurrency system.  Concept 20. The method of any preceding and/or succeeding Concept(s), wherein the awarding the cryptocurrency comprises generating, by the cryptocurrency system, a block for the awarded cryptocurrency and adding the generated block to a blockchain stored in the cryptocurrency system.  Concept 21. The method of any preceding and/or succeeding Concept(s), wherein the block comprises data comprising: the task provided to the device of the user; information on the awarded cryptocurrency; the generated hash associated with the body activity; and a hash of a previous block.  Concept 22. The method of any preceding and/or succeeding Concept(s), wherein the task comprises a test for verifying if the user of the device is human or not.  Concept 23. The method of any preceding and/or succeeding Concept(s),
further comprising: receiving, by the cryptocurrency system, from the device of the user, data of the body activity generated before the hash algorithm is applied and the hash of the body activity; rehashing, by the cryptocurrency system, the data of the body activity; and comparing, by the cryptocurrency system, the rehashed data with the hash of the body activity received from the device of the user to verify the body activity data. Concept 24. A device, comprising: one or more processors communicatively coupled to a sensor, the sensor configured to sense body activity of a user; and memory storing executable instructions that, if executed by the one or more processors, configure the device to: receive a task; generate body activity data based on the sensed body activity of the user, wherein the sensed body activity is associated with the received task; and transmit the generated body activity data to a system or network which verifies the body activity data to award cryptocurrency.  Concept 25. The system of any preceding and/or succeeding Concept(s), wherein the body activity sensed by the sensor comprises at least one of body radiation emitted from the user, body fluid flow, a brain wave, pulse rate or body heat radiation.  Concept 26. The system of any preceding and/or succeeding Concept(s), wherein the body activity data is generated using a hash algorithm converting human body activity into an encryption output.  Concept 27. The system of any preceding and/or succeeding Concept(s), wherein the body activity data comprises one or more vectors produced from the body activity sensed by the sensor.  Concept 28. The system of any preceding and/or succeeding Concept(s), wherein the body activity data is generated by producing one or more vectors from the body activity sensed by the sensor and encrypting the one or more vectors.
II. BILL GATES 666 MICROSOFT CRYPTOCURRENCY PATENT & MARINA ABRAMOVIC AD (November 13, 2020)
III. HR 666: Anti-Racism in Public Health Act of 2021
National Center for Anti-Racism and Health and Southern Poverty Law Center. Directs CDC National Center in cooperation with Dept. of Justice. Law Enforcement violence and public health, contact tracers, health and human services, legalizing surveillance state.
“This bill establishes within the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) a National Center on Antiracism and Health and a law enforcement violence prevention program.
Among other activities, the new center must declare racism a public health crisis, collect and analyze data, and administer research and grant programs to address racism and its impact on health and well-being.
Additionally, the bill specifically directs the CDC’s National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, in coordination with the Department of Justice and other relevant stakeholders, to carry out the law enforcement violence prevention program by conducting research and supporting other activities pertaining to law enforcement violence and public health.
ADL and SPLC authorize Swat Teams,
Sponsor: Rep. Pressley, Ayanna [D-MA-7] (Introduced 02/01/2021)
Committees: House – Energy and Commerce
Latest Action: House – 02/02/2021 Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
* = Original cosponsor
Rep. Lee, Barbara [D-CA-13]* 02/01/2021
Rep. Castor, Kathy [D-FL-14]* 02/01/2021
Rep. Nadler, Jerrold [D-NY-10]* 02/01/2021
Rep. Watson Coleman, Bonnie [D-NJ-12]* 02/01/2021
Rep. Takano, Mark [D-CA-41]* 02/01/2021
Rep. Davis, Danny K. [D-IL-7]* 02/01/2021
Rep. Jackson Lee, Sheila [D-TX-18]* 02/01/2021
Rep. Higgins, Brian [D-NY-26]* 02/01/2021
Rep. Cooper, Jim [D-TN-5]* 02/01/2021
Rep. Tlaib, Rashida [D-MI-13]* 02/01/2021
Rep. Ocasio-Cortez, Alexandria [D-NY-14]* 02/01/2021
Rep. Sires, Albio [D-NJ-8]* 02/01/2021
Rep. Vargas, Juan [D-CA-51]* 02/01/2021
Rep. Roybal-Allard, Lucille [D-CA-40]* 02/01/2021
Rep. Rush, Bobby L. [D-IL-1]* 02/01/2021
Rep. Hastings, Alcee L. [D-FL-20]* 02/01/2021
Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large]* 02/01/2021
Rep. Williams, Nikema [D-GA-5]* 02/01/2021
Rep. Bowman, Jamaal [D-NY-16]* 02/01/2021
Rep. Jayapal, Pramila [D-WA-7]* 02/01/2021
Rep. Velazquez, Nydia M. [D-NY-7]* 02/01/2021
Rep. Beatty, Joyce [D-OH-3]* 02/01/2021
Rep. Bush, Cori [D-MO-1]* 02/01/2021
Rep. Meng, Grace [D-NY-6]* 02/01/2021
Rep. Blumenauer, Earl [D-OR-3]* 02/01/2021
Rep. DeSaulnier, Mark [D-CA-11]* 02/01/2021
Rep. Ruppersberger, C. A. Dutch [D-MD-2]* 02/01/2021
Rep. Espaillat, Adriano [D-NY-13]* 02/01/2021
Rep. Sewell, Terri A. [D-AL-7]* 02/01/2021
Rep. Payne, Donald M., Jr. [D-NJ-10]* 02/01/2021
Rep. Omar, Ilhan [D-MN-5]* 02/01/2021
Rep. Sarbanes, John P. [D-MD-3]* 02/01/2021
Rep. Matsui, Doris O. [D-CA-6]* 02/01/2021
Rep. Smith, Adam [D-WA-9]* 02/01/2021
Rep. Carson, Andre [D-IN-7]* 02/01/2021
Rep. Clark, Katherine M. [D-MA-5]* 02/01/2021
Rep. Cohen, Steve [D-TN-9]* 02/01/2021
Rep. Chu, Judy [D-CA-27]* 02/01/2021
Rep. Torres, Ritchie [D-NY-15]* 02/01/2021
Rep. Scanlon, Mary Gay [D-PA-5] 02/02/2021
Rep. Neguse, Joe [D-CO-2] 02/02/2021
Rep. McGovern, James P. [D-MA-2] 02/02/2021
Rep. Jones, Mondaire [D-NY-17] 02/02/2021
Rep. Raskin, Jamie [D-MD-8] 02/02/2021
Rep. Maloney, Carolyn B. [D-NY-12] 02/04/2021
Rep. Wasserman Schultz, Debbie [D-FL-23] 02/04/2021
Rep. Garcia, Jesus G. “Chuy” [D-IL-4] 02/04/2021
Rep. Levin, Mike [D-CA-49] 02/08/2021
Rep. Blunt Rochester, Lisa [D-DE-At Large] 02/22/2021
Rep. Schakowsky, Janice D. [D-IL-9] 03/09/2021
Rep. Trone, David J. [D-MD-6] 03/09/2021
Rep. Schrader, Kurt [D-OR-5] 03/09/2021
Rep. Soto, Darren [D-FL-9] 04/08/2021
Rep. Thompson, Bennie G. [D-MS-2] 04/21/2021
Rep. Suozzi, Thomas R. [D-NY-3] 05/28/2021
Rep. Pocan, Mark [D-WI-2] 06/01/2021
Rep. Lowenthal, Alan S. [D-CA-47] 06/25/2021
Rep. Cicilline, David N. [D-RI-1] 05/11/2022
Rep. Stansbury, Melanie Ann [D-NM-1] 05/27/2022
Webmaster Comment: The above representatives are amongst the greatest traitors in American history. They should be tried, convicted and executed for attempted genocide.
IV. HR 6666: COVID-19 Testing, Reaching, And Contacting Everyone (TRACE) Act of 2019-20.
To authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services to award grants to eligible entities to conduct diagnostic testing for COVID–19, and related activities such as contact tracing, through mobile health units and, as necessary, at individuals’ residences, and for other purposes.
Covid 19 testing reaching and tracing everyone – Strike Forces. We’re hunting you down. College kids. The new job is contact tracer. The data base. No more warrants needed.
SEC. 2. COVID–19 testing and contact tracing using mobile health units.
(g) Authorization of appropriations.—To carry out this section, there are authorized to be appropriated—
(1) $100,000,000,000 ($100 billion) for fiscal year 2020; and
(2) such sums as may be necessary for each of fiscal year 2021 and any subsequent fiscal year during which the emergency period continues.
Sponsor: Rep. Rush, Bobby L. [D-IL-1] (Introduced 05/01/2020)
Committees: House – Energy and Commerce
Latest Action: House – 05/01/2020 Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
* = Original cosponsor
Rep. Barragan, Nanette Diaz [D-CA-44]* 05/01/2020
Rep. Bass, Karen [D-CA-37]* 05/01/2020
Rep. Beyer, Donald S., Jr. [D-VA-8]* 05/01/2020
Rep. Brown, Anthony G. [D-MD-4]* 05/01/2020
Rep. Butterfield, G. K. [D-NC-1]* 05/01/2020
Rep. Cárdenas, Tony [D-CA-29]* 05/01/2020
Rep. Carson, Andre [D-IN-7]* 05/01/2020
Rep. Cohen, Steve [D-TN-9]* 05/01/2020
Rep. Correa, J. Luis [D-CA-46]* 05/01/2020
Rep. Cuellar, Henry [D-TX-28]* 05/01/2020
Rep. DeGette, Diana [D-CO-1]* 05/01/2020
Rep. Demings, Val Butler [D-FL-10]* 05/01/2020
Rep. Gonzalez, Vicente [D-TX-15]* 05/01/2020
Rep. Grijalva, Raúl M. [D-AZ-3]* 05/01/2020
Rep. Hastings, Alcee L. [D-FL-20]* 05/01/2020
Rep. Hayes, Jahana [D-CT-5]* 05/01/2020
Rep. Higgins, Brian [D-NY-26]* 05/01/2020
Rep. Kaptur, Marcy [D-OH-9]* 05/01/2020
Rep. Khanna, Ro [D-CA-17]* 05/01/2020
Rep. Kuster, Ann M. [D-NH-2]* 05/01/2020
Rep. Larson, John B. [D-CT-1]* 05/01/2020
Rep. Lynch, Stephen F. [D-MA-8]* 05/01/2020
Rep. McCollum, Betty [D-MN-4]* 05/01/2020
Rep. Moore, Gwen [D-WI-4]* 05/01/2020
Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large]* 05/01/2020
Rep. Payne, Donald M., Jr. [D-NJ-10]* 05/01/2020
Rep. Raskin, Jamie [D-MD-8]* 05/01/2020
Rep. Rouda, Harley [D-CA-48]* 05/01/2020
Rep. Ryan, Tim [D-OH-13]* 05/01/2020
Rep. Sarbanes, John P. [D-MD-3]* 05/01/2020
Rep. Sewell, Terri A. [D-AL-7]* 05/01/2020
Rep. Sires, Albio [D-NJ-8]* 05/01/2020
Rep. Soto, Darren [D-FL-9]* 05/01/2020
Rep. Tlaib, Rashida [D-MI-13]* 05/01/2020
Rep. Thompson, Bennie G. [D-MS-2]* 05/01/2020
Rep. Velazquez, Nydia M. [D-NY-7]* 05/01/2020
Rep. Wasserman Schultz, Debbie [D-FL-23]* 05/01/2020
Rep. Napolitano, Grace F. [D-CA-32]* 05/01/2020
Rep. Gabbard, Tulsi [D-HI-2] 05/05/2020
Rep. Garcia, Jesus G. “Chuy” [D-IL-4] 05/05/2020
Rep. Wilson, Frederica S. [D-FL-24] 05/05/2020
Rep. Clarke, Yvette D. [D-NY-9] 05/05/2020
Rep. Bishop, Sanford D., Jr. [D-GA-2] 05/05/2020
Rep. Neguse, Joe [D-CO-2] 05/05/2020
Rep. Cisneros, Gilbert Ray, Jr. [D-CA-39] 05/12/2020
Rep. Chu, Judy [D-CA-27] 05/12/2020
Rep. Beatty, Joyce [D-OH-3] 05/12/2020
Rep. Jackson Lee, Sheila [D-TX-18] 05/12/2020
Rep. Johnson, Eddie Bernice [D-TX-30] 05/12/2020
Rep. Richmond, Cedric L. [D-LA-2] 05/12/2020
Rep. Meng, Grace [D-NY-6] 05/12/2020
Rep. Dingell, Debbie [D-MI-12] 05/12/2020
Rep. Dean, Madeleine [D-PA-4] 05/12/2020
Rep. Meeks, Gregory W. [D-NY-5] 05/12/2020
Rep. Davis, Danny K. [D-IL-7] 05/12/2020
Rep. Blunt Rochester, Lisa [D-DE-At Large] 05/12/2020
Rep. Evans, Dwight [D-PA-3] 05/12/2020
Rep. Mfume, Kweisi [D-MD-7] 05/12/2020
Rep. Scanlon, Mary Gay [D-PA-5] 05/22/2020
Rep. Connolly, Gerald E. [D-VA-11] 05/22/2020
Rep. Morelle, Joseph D. [D-NY-25] 05/22/2020
Rep. Doyle, Michael F. [D-PA-18] 05/22/2020
Rep. Kelly, Robin L. [D-IL-2] 05/22/2020
Rep. Johnson, Henry C. “Hank,” Jr. [D-GA-4] 05/22/2020
Rep. Schiff, Adam B. [D-CA-28] 06/11/2020
Rep. Welch, Peter [D-VT-At Large] 06/18/2020
Del. San Nicolas, Michael F. Q. [D-GU-At Large] 07/21/2020
Rep. Deutch, Theodore E. [D-FL-22] 08/21/2020
Rep. Lee, Barbara [D-CA-13] 08/28/2020
Rep. Cicilline, David N. [D-RI-1] 09/22/2020
Rep. Green, Al [D-TX-9] 10/01/2020
Rep. Haaland, Debra A. [D-NM-1]
Webmaster Comment: The above representatives are amongst the greatest traitors in American history. They should be tried, convicted and executed for attempted genocide.
VIII. Hackable Humans, Data Colonialism; Jewish Professor, Yuval Harari, Lecture On Davos’ Genocidal Agenda For The “Useless Class” (Whitney Webb, 1/31/21)
Dump Davos #1: Data Colonialism & Hackable Humans
Posted on January 31, 2021 Author Whitney WebbComment(0)
In this video series investigating the people and agendas of the World Economic Forum, Whitney Webb and Johnny Vedmore analyze a recent speech given at Davos by Israeli “futurist” historian Yuval Noah Harari that exposes the WEF’s agenda for the “useless class”, the rise of exploited data colonies, and the creation of an internal and external surveillance state.
Professor Harari at 56:40: “The major danger we face is the rise of digital dictatorship which will monitor everyone all the time. This danger can be stated in the following simple equation, which could be the defining equation of life in the 21st century:
B x C x D = AHH
where: B = biological knowledge, C = computing power, D = Data, AHH = Ability to Hack Humans.
If you know enough biological knowledge, and you have enough computing power and data, you can hack my body, my brain, and my life. You can understand me better than I understand myself. You know my personality type, my political views, my sexual preferences. my mental weaknesses, my deepest fears and hopes. You know more about me that I do myself. You can do this to everyone. A system that understands us better than we understand ourselves can predict our feelings and decisions, can manipulate our feelings and decisions, and can ultimately make decisions for us.
In the past, many tyrants and governments wanted to do this, but none of them, not the Gestapo, Stasi, or the KGB, etc. had the biological knowledge, computing power, and data to do this.
But soon a handful of both corporations and governments will be able to systematically hack all the people. We humans should get used to the idea that they are no longer mysterious souls. We are now hackable animals.
Johnny Vedmore: With mRNA vaccines, this is how this process starts.
Whitney Webb: Often when they start publicly announcing new technologies, they’ve also had it years beforehand. Algorhithms are ultimately going to be in charge of this system.
There are obvious tie-ins to pre-crime, pre-thought crime, predictive policing, and predictive health care here.
Harari: The power to hack human beings can be used for good purposes, like providing good health care. If it falls into the hands of a modern Stalin, this could lead to the worst, totalitarian system.
The higher you are in the hierarchy the more closely you will be watched in this total surveillance system.
Whitey Webb: Harari makes it clear that this surveillance system is to be used to monitor both a person’s external and internal life.
Obviously, this technology divides society into two classes, indeed, he is referring to two different species; the elite and everyone else.
Harari: Finally, technology might disrupt not just our economy and politics and philosophy, but also our biology. In the coming decades, AI and biotechnology will give us God-like abilities to re-engineer life and even to create completely new life forms. After 4 billion years of organic life shaped by natural selection, we are about to enter a new era of inorganic life shaped by intelligent design…. OUR intelligent design. A new driving force for the evolution of life.
And in using our new divine powers of creation, we might make mistakes on a cosmic scale. In particular, governments, corporations, and armies are likely to use technology to enhance human skills that they need like intelligence and discipline but neglecting other human skills like compassion and artistic sensitivity, and spirituality. The result might be a race of humans who are very intelligent but lack compassion, artistic sensitivity, and lack spiritual depth.